Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM41761060

Advanced, pharmacological and complementary interventions for chronic or recurrent orofacial pain conditions: a systematic evidence map with selective meta-analyses.

Calabrò Rocco Salvatore, Calderone Andrea, Bonanno Lilla, et al. · The journal of headache and pain · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1186/s10194-026-02300-7

Findings

144 findings

Population
Adults with chronic burning mouth syndromePharmacological agents or supplementsInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks)
SMD -0.29 [-1.31, 0.73]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
3 studies · 144 participants
Adults with burning mouth syndromePharmacological agents and supplementsInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: conservative SD imputation (Q3)
SMD -0.40 [-7.46, 6.66]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 126 participants
Adults with chronic burning mouth syndromePharmacological agents or supplementsInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: excluding studies at high risk of bias
SMD -0.60 [-1.71, 0.52]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with burning mouth syndromePharmacological agents and supplementsInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: fixed-effect model
SMD -0.50 [-0.90, -0.11]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 126 participants
Adults with chronic burning mouth syndromePharmacological agents or supplementsInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Lopez-Jornet et al. 2009
SMD -0.60 [-1.71, 0.52]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults with burning mouth syndromePharmacological agents and supplementsInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (more than 4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: conservative SD imputation (Q3)
SMD -0.29 [-1.31, 0.73]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 144 participants
Adults with chronic burning mouth syndromePharmacological agents or supplementsInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks)
SMD -0.40 [-7.46, 6.66]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
2 studies · 126 participants
Adults with burning mouth syndromePharmacological agents and supplementsInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (more than 4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: fixed-effect model
SMD -0.26 [-0.63, 0.11]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 144 participants
Adults with chronic burning mouth syndromePharmacological agents or supplementsInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Heckmann et al. 2012
SMD -0.38 [-2.22, 1.46]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults with chronic burning mouth syndromePharmacological agents or supplementsInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Felipe et al. 2022
SMD 0.29 [-2.43, 3.01]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults with chronic burning mouth syndromePhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: excluding studies at high risk of bias
SMD -1.00 [-1.98, -0.03]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with chronic burning mouth syndromePhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Quality of life
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks)
SMD -0.82 [-1.42, -0.21]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias
2 studies · 156 participants
Adults with chronic burning mouth syndromePhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Spanemberg et al. 2015
SMD -0.42 [-0.67, -0.16]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults with chronic burning mouth syndromePhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Supplementary Table 5 base case as reported there (3 studies; 7 contrasts)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
SMD -0.75 [-1.24, -0.26]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with chronic burning mouth syndromePhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Quality of life
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Spanemberg et al. 2015
SMD -0.35 [-0.91, 0.21]
GRADE not reported
1 study
Adults with burning mouth syndromePhotobiomodulation / low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: fixed-effect model
SMD -0.76 [-1.09, -0.43]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 200 participants
Adults with chronic burning mouth syndromePhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Martinez et al. 2024
SMD -1.00 [-1.98, -0.02]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults with chronic burning mouth syndromePhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Quality of life
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Supplementary Table 5 base case as reported there (2 studies; 6 contrasts)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
SMD -0.74 [-1.30, -0.17]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults with burning mouth syndromePhotobiomodulation / low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Quality of life
Short-term (immediate to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: conservative SD imputation (Q3)
SMD -0.82 [-1.42, -0.21]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 156 participants
Adults with chronic burning mouth syndromePhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Sikora et al. 2018
SMD -0.86 [-1.44, -0.29]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults with chronic burning mouth syndromePhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Quality of life
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Martinez et al. 2024
SMD -1.16 [-2.20, -0.11]
GRADE not reported
1 study
Adults with burning mouth syndromePhotobiomodulation / low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: conservative SD imputation (Q3)
SMD -0.81 [-1.35, -0.27]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 200 participants
Adults with burning mouth syndromePhotobiomodulation / low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Quality of life
Short-term (immediate to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: fixed-effect model
SMD -0.81 [-1.20, -0.42]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 156 participants
Adults with chronic burning mouth syndromePhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Adverse events
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks)
RR 0.55 [0.30, 1.00]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults with chronic burning mouth syndromePhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks)
SMD -0.81 [-1.35, -0.27]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias
3 studies · 200 participants
Adults with temporomandibular disordersDry needling / manual therapyActive comparatorPain intensity
Short-term (immediate to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: conservative SD imputation (Q3)
SMD -0.55 [-1.65, 0.55]
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 336 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersDry needling or manual therapyActive comparatorPain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Brochado et al. 2018
SMD -0.89 [-2.67, 0.89]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with temporomandibular disordersDry needling / manual therapyActive comparatorJaw function
Short-term (immediate to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: conservative SD imputation (Q3)
MD 2.11 [-1.40, 5.62]
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 336 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersDry needling or manual therapyActive comparatorJaw function
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Brochado et al. 2018
MD 2.98 [-2.40, 8.36]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersDry needling or manual therapyActive comparatorJaw function
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks)
MD 2.11 [-1.40, 5.62]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
5 studies · 336 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersDry needling or manual therapyActive comparatorPain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks)
SMD -0.55 [-1.65, 0.55]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
5 studies · 336 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersDry needling or manual therapyActive comparatorPain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Banda et al. 2023
SMD -0.66 [-1.92, 0.59]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with temporomandibular disordersDry needling / manual therapyActive comparatorJaw function
Mid-term (more than 4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: conservative SD imputation (Q3)
MD -1.94 [-5.97, 2.08]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 221 participants
Adults with temporomandibular disordersDry needling / manual therapyActive comparatorJaw function
Short-term (immediate to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: fixed-effect model
MD 0.51 [0.31, 0.72]
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 336 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersDry needling or manual therapyActive comparatorPain intensity
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks)
SMD -0.31 [-1.17, 0.55]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
3 studies · 221 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersDry needling or manual therapyActive comparatorPain intensity
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Brochado et al. 2018
SMD -0.72 [-2.33, 0.89]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersDry needling or manual therapyActive comparatorJaw function
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Ferreira et al. 2024
MD -4.13 [-10.82, 2.57]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersDry needling or manual therapyActive comparatorPain intensity
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Ferreira et al. 2024
SMD -0.17 [-1.59, 1.25]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults with temporomandibular disordersDry needling / manual therapyActive comparatorPain intensity
Mid-term (more than 4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: conservative SD imputation (Q3)
SMD -0.31 [-1.17, 0.55]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 221 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersDry needling or manual therapyActive comparatorPain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Ferreira et al. 2024
SMD -0.72 [-2.57, 1.12]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersDry needling or manual therapyActive comparatorJaw function
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Dunning et al. 2024
MD -0.74 [-4.21, 2.73]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults with temporomandibular disordersDry needling / manual therapyActive comparatorPain intensity
Mid-term (more than 4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: fixed-effect model
SMD -0.57 [-0.82, -0.32]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 221 participants
Adults with temporomandibular disordersDry needling / manual therapyActive comparatorPain intensity
Short-term (immediate to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: fixed-effect model
SMD -0.51 [-0.72, -0.29]
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 336 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersDry needling or manual therapyActive comparatorPain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Yu et al. 2025
SMD -0.14 [-0.58, 0.30]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersDry needling or manual therapyActive comparatorPain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Dunning et al. 2024
SMD -0.51 [-1.79, 0.78]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersDry needling or manual therapyActive comparatorPain intensity
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Dunning et al. 2024
SMD -0.12 [-1.05, 0.82]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersDry needling or manual therapyActive comparatorJaw function
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Ferreira et al. 2024
MD 0.49 [-3.80, 4.79]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersDry needling or manual therapyActive comparatorJaw function
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks)
MD -1.94 [-5.97, 2.08]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
3 studies · 221 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersDry needling or manual therapyActive comparatorJaw function
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Dunning et al. 2024
MD 3.00 [-0.28, 6.29]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersDry needling or manual therapyActive comparatorJaw function
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Brochado et al. 2018
MD -1.45 [-10.09, 7.19]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersDry needling or manual therapyActive comparatorJaw function
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Yu et al. 2025
MD 1.50 [-2.35, 5.35]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with temporomandibular disordersDry needling / manual therapyActive comparatorJaw function
Mid-term (more than 4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: fixed-effect model
MD -3.26 [-4.66, -1.85]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 221 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersDry needling or manual therapyActive comparatorJaw function
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Banda et al. 2023
MD 2.42 [-1.63, 6.48]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorJaw function
Long-term (>12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Abbadi et al. 2022
MD 0.22 [-1.21, 1.65]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorJaw function
Long-term (>12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Singh et al. 2021
MD -0.02 [-1.48, 1.44]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adults with temporomandibular disordersInjectables / intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Long-term (more than 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: fixed-effect model
SMD -0.44 [-0.66, -0.21]
GRADE not reported
9 studies · 272 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Long-term (>12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Jacob et al. 2022
SMD -0.53 [-1.05, -0.01]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks)
SMD -0.40 [-0.73, -0.08]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias
7 studies · 201 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Long-term (>12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Kilic et al. 2021
SMD -0.55 [-0.88, -0.22]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Singh et al. 2021
SMD -0.42 [-0.79, -0.05]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorJaw function
Long-term (>12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Bayramoglu et al. 2023
MD 0.07 [-1.38, 1.52]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Kheder et al. 2024
SMD -0.44 [-0.80, -0.08]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Long-term (>12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Kilic et al. 2016
SMD -0.53 [-0.92, -0.15]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Long-term (>12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Zarate et al. 2020
SMD -0.42 [-0.84, -0.01]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Qataya et al. 2025
SMD -0.46 [-0.81, -0.11]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorJaw function
Long-term (>12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Jacob et al. 2022
MD -0.80 [-3.21, 1.61]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adults with temporomandibular disordersInjectables / intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Long-term (more than 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: conservative SD imputation (Q3)
SMD -0.46 [-0.85, -0.08]
GRADE not reported
9 studies · 272 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Long-term (>12 weeks) · Sensitivity: excluding studies at high risk of bias
SMD -0.70 [-1.21, -0.19]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorJaw function
Long-term (>12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Kilic et al. 2015
MD -0.67 [-2.86, 1.51]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Long-term (>12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Kheder et al. 2024
SMD -0.48 [-0.90, -0.06]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Bayramoglu et al. 2023
SMD -0.40 [-0.78, -0.03]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Long-term (>12 weeks)
SMD -0.46 [-0.85, -0.08]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
9 studies · 272 participants
Adults with temporomandibular disordersInjectables / intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Short-term (immediate to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: conservative SD imputation (Q3)
SMD -0.40 [-0.73, -0.08]
GRADE not reported
7 studies · 201 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Long-term (>12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Abbadi et al. 2022
SMD -0.31 [-0.67, 0.06]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorJaw function
Long-term (>12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Kilic et al. 2021
MD -0.69 [-2.93, 1.55]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorJaw function
Long-term (>12 weeks)
MD -0.32 [-1.95, 1.32]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
7 studies · 221 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Abbadi et al. 2022
SMD -0.43 [-0.88, 0.03]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Karadayi et al. 2021
SMD -0.28 [-0.50, -0.06]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorJaw function
Long-term (>12 weeks) · Sensitivity: excluding studies at high risk of bias
MD -1.57 [-4.99, 1.86]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with temporomandibular disordersInjectables / intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorJaw function
Long-term (more than 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: conservative SD imputation (Q3)
MD -0.32 [-1.95, 1.32]
GRADE not reported
7 studies · 221 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Zarate et al. 2020
SMD -0.40 [-0.78, -0.01]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorJaw function
Long-term (>12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Kilic et al. 2016
MD -0.57 [-1.97, 0.83]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adults with temporomandibular disordersInjectables / intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorJaw function
Long-term (more than 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: fixed-effect model
MD -0.14 [-1.14, 0.86]
GRADE not reported
7 studies · 221 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Long-term (>12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Singh et al. 2021
SMD -0.46 [-0.88, -0.04]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Long-term (>12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Kilic et al. 2015
SMD -0.47 [-0.89, -0.05]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Adults with temporomandibular disordersInjectables / intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Short-term (immediate to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: fixed-effect model
SMD -0.41 [-0.67, -0.14]
GRADE not reported
7 studies · 201 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: excluding studies at high risk of bias
SMD -0.37 [-0.89, 0.15]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresActive comparatorPain intensity
Long-term (>12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Bayramoglu et al. 2023
SMD -0.42 [-0.83, -0.01]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks)
SMD -0.88 [-2.00, 0.23]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
4 studies · 200 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Ernberg et al. 2011
SMD -1.65 [-4.54, 1.24]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with temporomandibular disordersInjectables / intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (more than 4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: conservative SD imputation (Q3)
SMD -1.37 [-3.12, 0.38]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 200 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Kim et al. 2023
SMD -1.66 [-4.41, 1.09]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: excluding studies at high risk of bias
SMD -0.88 [-2.00, 0.23]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with temporomandibular disordersInjectables / intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: fixed-effect model
SMD -1.15 [-1.44, -0.86]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 200 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Louw et al. 2019
SMD -1.26 [-4.52, 2.00]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with temporomandibular disordersInjectables / intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: conservative SD imputation (Q3)
SMD -0.88 [-2.00, 0.23]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 200 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Mathpati et al. 2024
SMD -0.87 [-2.56, 0.83]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Ernberg et al. 2011
SMD -1.11 [-2.82, 0.60]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: excluding studies at high risk of bias
SMD -1.37 [-3.12, 0.38]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Kim et al. 2023
SMD -0.99 [-2.93, 0.96]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Jaw function
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Louw et al. 2019
MD -2.15 [-3.10, -1.19]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks)
SMD -1.37 [-3.12, 0.38]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
4 studies · 200 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Mathpati et al. 2024
SMD -0.49 [-1.26, 0.28]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with temporomandibular disordersInjectables / intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Jaw function
Mid-term (more than 4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: fixed-effect model
MD -2.07 [-2.66, -1.47]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 200 participants
Adults with temporomandibular disordersInjectables / intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Jaw function
Mid-term (more than 4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: conservative SD imputation (Q3)
MD -1.41 [-3.39, 0.58]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 200 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Jaw function
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: excluding studies at high risk of bias
MD -1.41 [-3.39, 0.58]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Jaw function
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks)
MD -1.41 [-3.39, 0.58]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
4 studies · 200 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Jaw function
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Kim et al. 2023
MD -1.41 [-4.81, 1.99]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Louw et al. 2019
SMD -0.88 [-2.98, 1.22]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Jaw function
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Ernberg et al. 2011
MD -1.52 [-4.74, 1.70]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with temporomandibular disordersInjectables / intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (more than 4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: fixed-effect model
SMD -1.68 [-2.00, -1.36]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 200 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectables or intra-articular proceduresInactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Jaw function
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Mathpati et al. 2024
MD 0.05 [-0.90, 0.99]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation / low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (more than 4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: conservative SD imputation (Q3)
SMD -0.91 [-3.47, 1.65]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 82 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Venancio et al. 2005
SMD -0.50 [-1.14, 0.14]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Shousha et al. 2021
SMD -0.16 [-0.68, 0.37]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Jaw function
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Chamani et al. 2024
MD 1.90 [-2.70, 6.50]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Jaw function
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Shousha et al. 2021
MD -1.03 [-2.51, 0.46]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: excluding studies at high risk of bias
SMD -0.40 [-1.26, 0.46]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Simon et al. 2020
SMD -0.52 [-1.20, 0.16]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: excluding studies at high risk of bias
SMD -0.91 [-3.47, 1.65]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Bertolucci et al. 1995
SMD -0.62 [-1.14, -0.10]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Jaw function
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Herpich et al. 2019
MD 1.23 [-2.01, 4.47]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Herpich et al. 2019
SMD -0.41 [-1.06, 0.24]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Chamani et al. 2024
SMD -0.35 [-1.03, 0.34]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Jaw function
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks)
MD 1.01 [-1.85, 3.87]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
5 studies · 391 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks)
SMD -0.91 [-3.47, 1.65]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
3 studies · 82 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks)
SMD -0.45 [-1.06, 0.17]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
10 studies · 462 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Venancio et al. 2005
SMD -0.97 [-13.95, 12.00]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Monteiro et al. 2020
SMD -0.35 [-5.69, 4.99]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (>4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Emshoff et al. 2008
SMD -1.41 [-9.02, 6.20]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adults with temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation / low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Jaw function
Short-term (immediate to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: fixed-effect model
MD 0.11 [-0.42, 0.64]
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 391 participants
Adults with temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation / low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: conservative SD imputation (Q3)
SMD -0.45 [-1.06, 0.17]
GRADE not reported
10 studies · 462 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Jaw function
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Bertolucci et al. 1995
MD 1.59 [-1.41, 4.59]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Delvecchio et al. 2021
SMD -0.49 [-1.18, 0.20]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Emshoff et al. 2008
SMD -0.49 [-1.14, 0.15]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Carli et al. 2013
SMD -0.51 [-1.24, 0.22]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Jaw function
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: excluding studies at high risk of bias
MD 2.46 [-5.98, 10.89]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation / low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Jaw function
Short-term (immediate to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: conservative SD imputation (Q3)
MD 1.01 [-1.85, 3.87]
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 391 participants
Adults with temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation / low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Mid-term (more than 4 to 12 weeks) · Sensitivity: fixed-effect model
SMD -0.71 [-1.09, -0.33]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 82 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Borges et al. 2017
SMD -0.40 [-1.14, 0.33]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation or low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Jaw function
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: leave-one-out, omitting Aisaiti et al. 2021
MD 1.10 [-2.72, 4.93]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with temporomandibular disordersPhotobiomodulation / low-level laser therapy (PBM/LLLT)Inactive control (placebo, sham, usual care or no intervention)Pain intensity
Short-term (immediate to 4 weeks) · Sensitivity: fixed-effect model
SMD -0.42 [-0.61, -0.23]
GRADE not reported
10 studies · 462 participants
Adults with trigeminal neuralgiaNeuromodulationInactive controlPain intensity
Long-term (>12 weeks)
SMD -0.40 [-0.73, -0.08]
GRADE not reported
4 studies · 251 participants
Adults with chronic or recurrent temporomandibular disordersInjectable comparisons (subset)Not specifiedAdverse events
Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks)
RR 0.84 [0.72, 0.98]
GRADE not reported
3 studies

Included primary studies 241

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Karadayi 2021
Randomised controlled trial of arthrocentesis with or without PRF for internal derangement of the TMJ.
PMID:33581954
20214 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Monteiro 2020
Effectiveness of Photobiomodulation in Temporomandibular Disorder-Related Pain Using a 635 nm Diode Laser: A Randomized, Blinded, and…
PMID:32427553
20204 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Wang 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NR4 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Ferreira 2017
Short-term transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain and improves the masticatory muscle activity in temporomandibular…
PMID:28403351
20173 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Kilic 2016
Is arthrocentesis plus platelet-rich plasma superior to arthrocentesis plus hyaluronic acid for the treatment of temporomandibular joint…
PMID:27364372
20163 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Abbadi 2022
Arthrocentesis, Injectable Platelet-Rich Plasma and Combination of Both Protocols of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders Management: A…
PMID:36523721
20222 other reviewsPain intensity; Jaw functionnot extracted yet
Aisaiti 2021
Effect of photobiomodulation therapy on painful temporomandibular disorders.
PMID:33907210
20212 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Bayramoglu 2023
Does intra-articular injection of tenoxicam after arthrocentesis heal outcomes of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis? A randomized…
PMID:36890529
20232 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Cömert Kiliç 2015
Is Arthrocentesis Plus Platelet-Rich Plasma Superior to Arthrocentesis Alone in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis? A…
PMID:25976690
20152 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Cömert Kılıç 2021
Does glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, and methylsulfonylmethane supplementation improve the outcome of temporomandibular joint…
PMID:33685850
20212 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Dıracoglu 2012
Effectiveness of dry needling for the treatment of temporomandibular myofascial pain: a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study.
PMID:23220812
20122 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Emshoff 2008
Low-level laser therapy for treatment of temporomandibular joint pain: a double-blind and placebo-controlled trial.
PMID:18329580
20082 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Herpich 2020
Intraoral photobiomodulation diminishes pain and improves functioning in women with temporomandibular disorder: a randomized,…
PMID:31325122
20202 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Karadayi 2021
Randomised controlled trial of arthrocentesis with or without PRF for internal derangement of the TMJ
DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2021.01.018
20212 other reviewsPain intensitynot extracted yet
Rezazadeh 2023
Effect of Non-Ablative Non-Thermal CO2 Laser on Drug-Resistant Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Pilot Study.
PMID:37335618
20232 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Shehata 2013
Botulinum toxin-type A: could it be an effective treatment option in intractable trigeminal neuralgia?
PMID:24251833
20132 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Wu 2012
Botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
PMID:22492424
20122 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Zhang 2014
Two doses of botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: observation of therapeutic effect from a randomized,…
PMID:25263254
20142 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Aisaiti 2021
Effect of photobiomodulation therapy on painful temporomandibular disorders
DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-87265-0
20211 other reviewJaw functionnot extracted yet
Ângelo 2025
Double-Puncture Arthrocentesis in Arthrogenous TMJ Disorders: Bioviscosupplementation vs. Viscosupplementation a Randomized Controlled…
PMID:40507514
20251 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Brochado 2018
Comparative effectiveness of photobiomodulation and manual therapy alone or combined in TMD patients: a randomized clinical trial.
PMID:29995062
20181 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Cömert Kiliç 2016
Is dextrose prolotherapy superior to placebo for the treatment of temporomandibular joint hypermobility? A randomized clinical trial.
PMID:26846795
20161 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Del Vecchio 2021
Evaluation of the efficacy of a new low-level laser therapy home protocol in the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorder-related…
DOI:10.1080/08869634.2019.1599174
20191 other reviewPain intensitynot extracted yet
Del Vecchio 2021
Evaluation of the efficacy of a new low-level laser therapy home protocol in the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorder-related…
PMID:30999823
20211 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Ekici 2022
Effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy in patients with myogenic temporomandibular joint disorder: A double-blind,…
PMID:34174507
20221 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Espejo-Antúnez 2024
Effects of adding electro-massage to manual therapy for the treatment of individuals with myofascial temporomandibular pain: a randomized…
PMID:39292112
20241 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Ferreira 2017
Short-term transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation reduces pain and improves the masticatory muscle activity in temporomandibular…
DOI:10.1590/1678-77572016-0173
20171 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Ferreira 2024
Manual therapy and dry needling improve mobility, pain and reduce fear of COVID-19 in temporomandibular disorder patients: Randomized…
PMID:39593654
20241 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
García-de la-Banda-García 2023
Effectiveness of Dry Needling versus Manual Therapy in Myofascial Temporomandibular Disorders: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
PMID:37763182
20231 other reviewPain intensity; Jaw functionnot extracted yet
Gremeau-Richard 2004
Topical clonazepam in stomatodynia: a randomised placebo-controlled study.
PMID:15109507
20041 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Hagenacker 2014
Patient-conducted anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex alleviates pain in trigeminal neuralgia.
PMID:25424567
20141 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Herpich 2020
Intraoral photobiomodulation diminishes pain and improves functioning in women with temporomandibular disorder: a randomized,…
DOI:10.1007/s10103-019-02841-1
20191 other reviewPain intensity; Jaw functionnot extracted yet
Jacob 2022
Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Hyaluronic Acid Following Arthrocentesis for Temporomandibular Joint Disc Disorders: A Randomized…
PMID:36896087
20221 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Karagözoğlu 2024
Clinical Efficacy of Two Different Low-Level Laser Therapies for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled…
PMID:39598034
20241 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Kheder 2024
Ultrasound-Guided Vs Non-Guided Prolotherapy for Internal Derangement of Temporomandibular Joint. A Randomized Clinical Trial.
PMID:38581185
20241 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Li 2024
Electroacupuncture and carbamazepine for patients with trigeminal neuralgia: a randomized, controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial.
PMID:38816482
20241 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Liu 2024
Effect of acupuncture for temporomandibular disorders: a randomized clinical trial.
PMID:38710498
20241 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Magri 2018
Non-specific effects and clusters of women with painful TMD responders and non-responders to LLLT: double-blind randomized clinical trial.
PMID:29209867
20181 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Mansano 2023
Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Trigeminal Neuralgia Management: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial.
PMID:36029256
20231 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Mathpati 2024
Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Management of Temporomandibular Joint Pain in Young Adults With Temporomandibular Disorder.
PMID:38586782
20241 other reviewPain intensity; Jaw functionnot extracted yet
Monteiro 2020
Effectiveness of Photobiomodulation in Temporomandibular Disorder-Related Pain Using a 635 nm Diode Laser: A Randomized, Blinded, and…
DOI:10.1089/photob.2019.4730
20201 other reviewPain intensitynot extracted yet
Nadershah 2020
Photobiomodulation Therapy for Myofascial Pain in Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction: A Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial.
PMID:31988570
20201 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Özden 2020
Efficacy of dry needling in patients with myofascial temporomandibular disorders related to the masseter muscle.
PMID:30296920
20201 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Qataya 2025
Piano level laser therapy versus epidermal growth factor injection for painful myogenic temporomandibular disorder (a randomized clinical…
PMID:39912963
20251 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Shousha 2021
Effects of low-level laser therapy versus soft occlusive splints on mouth opening and surface electromyography in females with…
PMID:34597318
20211 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Sielski 2025
Single intra-articular administration of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (I-PRF) in alleviating temporomandibular joint pain: A pilot…
DOI:10.17219/dmp/188273
20251 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Singh 2021
Evaluation of Arthrocentesis with and Without Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Management of Internal Derangement of Temporomandibular Joint: A…
PMID:33927494
20211 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Venancio 2005
Low intensity laser therapy in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders: a double-blind study.
PMID:16202043
20051 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Venezian 2010
Low level laser effects on pain to palpation and electromyographic activity in TMD patients: a double-blind, randomized,…
PMID:20491229
20101 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Vingender 2023
Evaluation of the efficiency of hyaluronic acid, PRP and I-PRF intra-articular injections in the treatment of internal derangement of the…
DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2023.01.017
20231 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Agarwal 2021
Radiofrequency Treatment of Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia (Conventional vs. Pulsed): A Prospective Randomized Control Study.
PMID:34667342
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ângelo 2023
Effectiveness of double-puncture temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis with viscosupplementation in different categories of severity – a…
DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2023.09.010
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ângelo 2023
Outcomes of IncobotulinumtoxinA Injection on Myalgia and Arthralgia in Patients Undergoing Temporomandibular Joint Arthroscopy: A…
PMID:37368677
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ângelo 2023
Effectiveness of double-puncture temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis with viscosupplementation in different categories of severity - a…
PMID:37852891
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Arduino 2016
A randomized pilot study to assess the safety and the value of low-level laser therapy versus clonazepam in patients with burning mouth…
DOI:10.1007/s10103-016-1897-8
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Arduino 2016
A randomized pilot study to assess the safety and the value of low-level laser therapy versus clonazepam in patients with burning mouth…
PMID:26873501
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Barbosa 2018
Evaluation of laser therapy and alpha-lipoic acid for the treatment of burning mouth syndrome: a randomized clinical trial
DOI:10.1007/s10103-018-2472-2
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Barbosa 2018
Evaluation of laser therapy and alpha-lipoic acid for the treatment of burning mouth syndrome: a randomized clinical trial.
PMID:29502160
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bardellini 2019
Efficacy of the photobiomodulation therapy in the treatment of the burning mouth syndrome.
PMID:31655841
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bayramoglu 2023
Does intra-articular injection of tenoxicam after arthrocentesis heal outcomes of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis? A randomized…
DOI:10.1186/s12903-023-02852-z
2023this review onlyPain intensity; Jaw functionnot extracted yet
Bertolucci 1995
Clinical Analysis of Mid-Laser Versus Placebo Treatment of Arthralgic TMJ Degenerative Joints
DOI:10.1080/08869634.1995.11678038
1995this review onlyPain intensity; Jaw functionnot extracted yet
Bertolucci 1995
Clinical analysis of mid-laser versus placebo treatment of arthralgic TMJ degenerative joints.
PMID:7585998
1995this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bessho 1998
Effectiveness of Kampo medicine (Sai-boku-to) in treatment of patients with glossodynia
DOI:10.1016/s1079-2104(98)90204-9
1998this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bessho 1998
Effectiveness of kampo medicine (sai-boku-to) in treatment of patients with glossodynia.
PMID:9868725
1998this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bharti 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bharti 2019
Radiofrequency Thermoablation of the Gasserian Ganglion Versus the Peripheral Branches of the Trigeminal Nerve for Treatment of Trigeminal…
PMID:30921978
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Blanco-Rueda 2023
Preliminary Findings of the Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin in Temporomandibular Disorders: Uncontrolled Pilot Study.
PMID:36836702
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Borges 2017
Effects of different photobiomodulation dosimetries on temporomandibular dysfunction: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled…
DOI:10.1007/s10103-018-2533-6
2018this review onlyPain intensitynot extracted yet
Borges 2017
Effects of different photobiomodulation dosimetries on temporomandibular dysfunction: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled…
PMID:29850961
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Brochado 2018
Comparative effectiveness of photobiomodulation and manual therapy alone or combined in TMD patients: a randomized clinical trial
DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0050
2018this review onlyPain intensity; Jaw functionnot extracted yet
Carrasco 2008
Low Intensity Laser Therapy in Temporomandibular Disorder: a Phase II Double-Blind Study
DOI:10.1179/crn.2008.037
2008this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Carrasco 2008
Low intensity laser therapy in temporomandibular disorder: a phase II double-blind study.
PMID:19004308
2008this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Castillo-Felipe 2022
Response to Treatment with Melatonin and Clonazepam versus Placebo in Patients with Burning Mouth Syndrome
DOI:10.3390/jcm11092516
2022this review onlyPain intensitynot extracted yet
Castillo-Felipe 2022
Response to Treatment with Melatonin and Clonazepam versus Placebo in Patients with Burning Mouth Syndrome.
PMID:35566642
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Cavalcanti 2009
Alpha lipoic acid in burning mouth syndrome – a randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0714.2008.00735.x
2009this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Cavalcanti 2009
Alpha lipoic acid in burning mouth syndrome--a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
PMID:19175713
2009this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Chamani 2024
Comparison of low‐level laser therapy and standard treatment for temporomandibular disorders: An assessment of therapeutic and placebo…
DOI:10.1111/joor.13634
2023this review onlyPain intensity; Jaw functionnot extracted yet
Chamani 2024
Comparison of low-level laser therapy and standard treatment for temporomandibular disorders: An assessment of therapeutic and placebo…
PMID:38012102
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Chellappa 2020
Comparative efficacy of low-Level laser and TENS in the symptomatic relief of temporomandibular joint disorders: A randomized clinical trial
DOI:10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_735_18
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Chellappa 2020
Comparative efficacy of low-Level laser and TENS in the symptomatic relief of temporomandibular joint disorders: A randomized clinical…
PMID:32246680
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Cömert Kiliç 2015
Is Arthrocentesis Plus Platelet-Rich Plasma Superior to Arthrocentesis Alone in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis? A…
DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2015.02.026
2015this review onlyPain intensity; Jaw functionnot extracted yet
Cömert Kiliç 2016
Is dextrose prolotherapy superior to placebo for the treatment of temporomandibular joint hypermobility? A randomized clinical trial
DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2016.01.006
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Cömert Kılıç 2021
Does glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, and methylsulfonylmethane supplementation improve the outcome of temporomandibular joint…
DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2021.02.012
2021this review onlyPain intensity; Jaw functionnot extracted yet
Conti 1997
Low Level Laser Therapy in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders (TMD): A Double-blind Pilot Study
DOI:10.1080/08869634.1997.11746005
1997this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Conti 1997
Low level laser therapy in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMD): a double-blind pilot study.
PMID:9586517
1997this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
de Abreu 2024
Long-Term Benefits of Photobiomodulation Therapy on Health-Related Quality of Life in Burning Mouth Syndrome Patients: A Prospective Study
DOI:10.3390/jcm13144272
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
de Abreu 2024
Long-Term Benefits of Photobiomodulation Therapy on Health-Related Quality of Life in Burning Mouth Syndrome Patients: A Prospective Study.
PMID:39064312
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
de Carli 2013
Piroxicam and laser phototherapy in the treatment of <scp>TMJ</scp> arthralgia: a double‐blind randomised controlled trial
DOI:10.1111/joor.12022
2012this review onlyPain intensitynot extracted yet
de Carli 2013
Piroxicam and laser phototherapy in the treatment of TMJ arthralgia: a double-blind randomised controlled trial.
PMID:23252583
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
De la Torre Canales 2022
Long-Term Effects of a Single Application of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Temporomandibular Myofascial Pain Patients: A Controlled Clinical…
PMID:36355991
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
de Pedro 2020
Effects of photobiomodulation with low‐level laser therapy in burning mouth syndrome: A randomized clinical trial
DOI:10.1111/odi.13443
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
de Pedro 2020
Effects of photobiomodulation with low-level laser therapy in burning mouth syndrome: A randomized clinical trial.
PMID:32460396
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Dıracoglu 2012
Effectiveness of dry needling for the treatment of temporomandibular myofascial pain: A double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study
DOI:10.3233/bmr-2012-0338
2012this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Du 2025
Safety and efficacy of percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation with varying puncture trajectories for recurrent maxillary trigeminal…
DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1577399
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Du 2025
Safety and efficacy of percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation with varying puncture trajectories for recurrent maxillary trigeminal…
PMID:40697569
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Dunning 2024
Dry needling and upper cervical spinal manipulation in patients with temporomandibular disorder: A multi-center randomized clinical trial
DOI:10.1080/08869634.2022.2062137
2022this review onlyPain intensity; Jaw functionnot extracted yet
Dunning 2024
Dry needling and upper cervical spinal manipulation in patients with temporomandibular disorder: A multi-center randomized clinical trial.
PMID:35412448
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Dworkin 1994
Brief group cognitive-behavioral intervention for temporomandibular disorders
DOI:10.1016/0304-3959(94)90070-1
1994this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Dworkin 1994
Brief group cognitive-behavioral intervention for temporomandibular disorders.
PMID:7892015
1994this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Dworkin 2002
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Dworkin 2002
A randomized clinical trial of a tailored comprehensive care treatment program for temporomandibular disorders.
PMID:12455427
2002this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ekici 2022
Effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy in patients with myogenic temporomandibular joint disorder: A double-blind,…
DOI:10.1016/j.jormas.2021.06.009
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
El Hossieny 2020
Impact of combining pulsed and thermal radiofrequency on long-term therapy of idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia: A prospective study
DOI:10.1080/11101849.2020.1762460
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Emshoff 2008
Low-level laser therapy for treatment of temporomandibular joint pain: a double-blind and placebo-controlled trial
DOI:10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.09.012
2008this review onlyPain intensitynot extracted yet
Ernberg 2011
Efficacy of botulinum toxin type A for treatment of persistent myofascial TMD pain: A randomized, controlled, double-blind multicenter study
DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2011.03.036
2011this review onlyPain intensity; Jaw functionnot extracted yet
Ernberg 2011
Efficacy of botulinum toxin type A for treatment of persistent myofascial TMD pain: a randomized, controlled, double-blind multicenter…
PMID:21514731
2011this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Espejo-Antúnez 2024
Effects of adding electro-massage to manual therapy for the treatment of individuals with myofascial temporomandibular pain: a randomized…
DOI:10.1590/1678-7757-2024-0109
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Faizo 2025
Patient satisfaction and pain relief following radiofrequency rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia: a prospective cohort study
DOI:10.3389/fpain.2025.1639140
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Faizo 2025
Patient satisfaction and pain relief following radiofrequency rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia: a prospective cohort study.
PMID:40958819
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Farahat 2023
Effect of low-level LASER therapy versus CAD/CAM Michigan splint on patients with Temporomandibular Muscle Disorders: a randomized…
DOI:10.4322/bds.2023.e3940
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ferreira 2013
Laser acupuncture in patients with temporomandibular dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial
DOI:10.1007/s10103-013-1273-x
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ferreira 2013
Laser acupuncture in patients with temporomandibular dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial.
PMID:23380907
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ferreira 2024
Manual therapy and dry needling improve mobility, pain and reduce fear of COVID-19 in temporomandibular disorder patients: Randomized…
DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.05.015
2024this review onlyPain intensity; Jaw functionnot extracted yet
Fikácková 2007
Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: A Placebo-Controlled Study
DOI:10.1089/pho.2007.2053
2007this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Fikácková 2007
Effectiveness of low-level laser therapy in temporomandibular joint disorders: a placebo-controlled study.
PMID:17803388
2007this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Fricova 2021
A Prospective Single-Center Study of the Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation at 2-Week Follow-Up in 17 Patients with…
DOI:10.12659/msm.933017
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Fricova 2021
A Prospective Single-Center Study of the Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation at 2-Week Follow-Up in 17 Patients with…
PMID:34789713
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Garcia Martinez 2024
Burning Mouth Syndrome Treated with Low-Level Laser and Clonazepam: A Randomized, Single-Blind Clinical Trial
DOI:10.3390/biomedicines12051048
2024this review onlyPain intensity; Quality of lifenot extracted yet
Garcia Martinez 2024
Burning Mouth Syndrome Treated with Low-Level Laser and Clonazepam: A Randomized, Single-Blind Clinical Trial.
PMID:38791010
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gremeau-Richard 2004
Topical clonazepam in stomatodynia: a randomised placebo-controlled study
DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.002
2004this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hagenacker 2014
Patient-conducted anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex alleviates pain in trigeminal neuralgia
DOI:10.1186/1129-2377-15-78
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Heckmann 2012
A double‐blind study on clonazepam in patients with burning mouth syndrome
DOI:10.1002/lary.22490
2012this review onlyPain intensitynot extracted yet
Heckmann 2012
A double-blind study on clonazepam in patients with burning mouth syndrome.
PMID:22344742
2012this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Herrero Babiloni 2024
One session of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation induces mild and transient analgesic effects among female individuals with…
DOI:10.1111/joor.13655
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Herrero Babiloni 2024
One session of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation induces mild and transient analgesic effects among female individuals with…
PMID:38225806
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hodaj 2015
Treatment of Chronic Facial Pain Including Cluster Headache by Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Motor Cortex With…
DOI:10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.416
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hodaj 2015
Treatment of Chronic Facial Pain Including Cluster Headache by Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Motor Cortex With…
PMID:25979838
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jacob 2022
Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Hyaluronic Acid Following Arthrocentesis for Temporomandibular Joint Disc Disorders: A Randomized…
DOI:10.1007/s12663-021-01519-y
2021this review onlyPain intensity; Jaw functionnot extracted yet
Jurisic Kvesic 2015
The Effectiveness of Acupuncture versus Clonazepam in Patients with Burning Mouth Syndrome
DOI:10.1136/acupmed-2015-010759
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jurisic Kvesic 2015
The effectiveness of acupuncture versus clonazepam in patients with burning mouth syndrome.
PMID:25987645
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Karagözoğlu 2024
Clinical Efficacy of Two Different Low-Level Laser Therapies for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled…
DOI:10.3390/jcm13226890
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kheder 2024
Ultrasound‐Guided Vs Non‐Guided Prolotherapy for Internal Derangement of Temporomandibular Joint. A Randomized Clinical Trial
DOI:10.1002/jum.16462
2024this review onlyPain intensitynot extracted yet
Kilic 2016
Is arthrocentesis plus platelet-rich plasma superior to arthrocentesis plus hyaluronic acid for the treatment of temporomandibular joint…
DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2016.06.009
2016this review onlyPain intensity; Jaw functionnot extracted yet
Kim 2023
Effect of Botulinum Toxin on Masticatory Muscle Pain in Patients with Temporomandibular Disorders: A Randomized, Double-Blind,…
PMID:37888628
2023this review onlyPain intensity; Jaw functionnot extracted yet
Kim 2024
Exploring HD-tDCS Effect on μ-opioid Receptor and Pain Sensitivity in Temporomandibular Disorder: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial Study
DOI:10.1016/j.jpain.2023.11.001
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kim 2024
Exploring HD-tDCS Effect on μ-opioid Receptor and Pain Sensitivity in Temporomandibular Disorder: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial Study.
PMID:37956741
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kogawa 2005
Evaluation of the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and the microelectric neurostimulation (MENS) in the treatment of myogenic…
DOI:10.1590/s1678-77572005000300015
2005this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kogawa 2005
Evaluation of the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and the microelectric neurostimulation (MENS) in the treatment of myogenic…
PMID:20878031
2005this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Komiyama 2013
Group cognitive-behavioral intervention for patients with burning mouth syndrome
DOI:10.2334/josnusd.55.17
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Komiyama 2013
Group cognitive-behavioral intervention for patients with burning mouth syndrome.
PMID:23485596
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Li 2023
DOI:10.3390/diagnostics1301005110.3390/diagnostics13010051
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Li 2023
Myogenous Temporomandibular Disorders: Diagnostic Concepts and Prospective Pilot Study on Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy.
PMID:36611343
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Li 2024
Electroacupuncture and carbamazepine for patients with trigeminal neuralgia: a randomized, controlled, 2 × 2 factorial trial
DOI:10.1007/s00415-024-12433-x
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Liu 2024
Effect of acupuncture for temporomandibular disorders: a randomized clinical trial
DOI:10.1093/qjmed/hcae094
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lončar-Brzak 2022
Burning Mouth Syndrome (BMS)—Treatment with Verbal and Written Information, B Vitamins, Probiotics, and Low-Level Laser Therapy: A…
DOI:10.3390/dj10030044
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lončar-Brzak 2022
Burning Mouth Syndrome (BMS)-Treatment with Verbal and Written Information, B Vitamins, Probiotics, and Low-Level Laser Therapy: A…
PMID:35323246
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
López-D’alessandro 2011
Combination of alpha lipoic acid and gabapentin, its efficacy in the treatment of Burning Mouth Syndrome: A randomized, double-blind,…
DOI:10.4317/medoral.16942
2011this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
López-D’alessandro 2011
Combination of alpha lipoic acid and gabapentin, its efficacy in the treatment of Burning Mouth Syndrome: a randomized, double-blind,…
PMID:20711135
2011this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
López-Jornet 2009
Efficacy of alpha lipoic acid in burning mouth syndrome: a randomized, placebo‐treatment study
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01914.x
2008this review onlyPain intensitynot extracted yet
López-Jornet 2009
Efficacy of alpha lipoic acid in burning mouth syndrome: a randomized, placebo-treatment study.
PMID:18976257
2009this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Louw 2019
DOI:10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.07.02310.1016/j.mayocp.2018.07.02330878157
NRthis review onlyPain intensity; Jaw functionnot extracted yet
Louw 2019
Treatment of Temporomandibular Dysfunction With Hypertonic Dextrose Injection (Prolotherapy): A Randomized Controlled Trial With Long-term…
PMID:30878157
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lu 2025
Efficacy and safety of photobiomodulation combined with oral cryotherapy on oral mucosa pain in patients with burning mouth syndrome: a…
DOI:10.1186/s12916-025-04015-z
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lu 2025
Efficacy and safety of photobiomodulation combined with oral cryotherapy on oral mucosa pain in patients with burning mouth syndrome: a…
PMID:40189502
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lu 2026
Long-term efficacy of photobiomodulation in burning mouth syndrome: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106275
2026this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lu 2026
Long-term efficacy of photobiomodulation in burning mouth syndrome: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
PMID:41338367
2026this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Magri 2018
Non-specific effects and clusters of women with painful TMD responders and non-responders to LLLT: double-blind randomized clinical trial
DOI:10.1007/s10103-017-2406-4
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Manafikhi 2022
Evaluation of the efficacy of platelet rich fibrin (I-PRF) intra-articular injections in the management of internal derangements of…
DOI:10.1186/s12891-022-05421-7
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Manafikhi 2022
Evaluation of the efficacy of platelet rich fibrin (I-PRF) intra-articular injections in the management of internal derangements of…
PMID:35568935
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mansano 2023
Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Trigeminal Neuralgia Management: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial
DOI:10.1093/pm/pnac132
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Maracci 2022
Treatment of myofascial pain with a rapid laser therapy protocol compared to occlusal splint: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial
DOI:10.1080/08869634.2020.1773661
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Maracci 2022
Treatment of myofascial pain with a rapid laser therapy protocol compared to occlusal splint: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial.
PMID:32491964
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Marotta 2024
Efficacy of 660 nm Photobiomodulation in Burning Mouth Syndrome Management: A Single-Blind Quasi-Experimental Controlled Clinical Trial
DOI:10.1089/photob.2023.0158
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Marotta 2024
Efficacy of 660 nm Photobiomodulation in Burning Mouth Syndrome Management: A Single-Blind Quasi-Experimental Controlled Clinical Trial.
PMID:38407832
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mazzetto 2007
Low Intensity Laser Application in Temporomandibular Disorders: A Phase I Double-Blind Study
DOI:10.1179/crn.2007.029
2007this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mazzetto 2007
Low intensity laser application in temporomandibular disorders: a phase I double-blind study.
PMID:17696035
2007this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Nadershah 2020
Photobiomodulation Therapy for Myofascial Pain in Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction: A Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
DOI:10.1007/s12663-019-01222-z
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Nie 2014
A Prospective Study of X-Ray Imaging Combined with Skin Stimulation Potential-Guided Percutaneous Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation of the…
DOI:10.1111/pme.12359
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Nie 2014
A prospective study of X-ray imaging combined with skin stimulation potential-guided percutaneous radiofrequency thermocoagulation of the…
PMID:24506258
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Oliveira 2015
Transcranial direct current stimulation and exercises for treatment of chronic temporomandibular disorders: a blind randomised‐controlled…
DOI:10.1111/joor.12300
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Oliveira 2015
Transcranial direct current stimulation and exercises for treatment of chronic temporomandibular disorders: a blind randomised-controlled…
PMID:25891021
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Özden 2020
Efficacy of dry needling in patients with myofascial temporomandibular disorders related to the masseter muscle
DOI:10.1080/08869634.2018.1526848
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Palmer 2024
Efficacy of cranial electrotherapy stimulation in patients with burning mouth syndrome: a randomized, controlled, double-blind pilot study
DOI:10.3389/fneur.2024.1343093
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Palmer 2024
Efficacy of cranial electrotherapy stimulation in patients with burning mouth syndrome: a randomized, controlled, double-blind pilot study.
PMID:38419716
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Park 2025
Evaluating the Efficacy of a Digital Therapeutic Intervention for Temporomandibular Disorders: Multicenter, Randomized, Sham-Controlled…
DOI:10.2196/83545
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Park 2025
Evaluating the Efficacy of a Digital Therapeutic Intervention for Temporomandibular Disorders: Multicenter, Randomized, Sham-Controlled…
PMID:41135079
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Punch 1984
Biofeedback and relaxation therapy for chronic temporomandibular joint pain: Predicting successful outcomes.
DOI:10.1037//0022-006x.52.6.928
1984this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Punch 1984
Biofeedback and relaxation therapy for chronic temporomandibular joint pain: predicting successful outcomes.
PMID:6394632
1984this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Qataya 2025
Piano level laser therapy versus epidermal growth factor injection for painful myogenic temporomandibular disorder (a randomized clinical…
DOI:10.1007/s00784-025-06189-5
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Qataya 2025
Effect of Nd‐ <scp>YAG</scp> Laser Versus Epidermal Growth Factor Injection on Salivary Pain Mediators in Myogenic Temporomandibular…
DOI:10.1111/jop.70053
2025this review onlyPain intensitynot extracted yet
Qataya 2025
Effect of Nd-YAG Laser Versus Epidermal Growth Factor Injection on Salivary Pain Mediators in Myogenic Temporomandibular Disorders (A…
PMID:40891771
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rezazadeh 2023
Effect of Non-Ablative Non-Thermal CO <sub>2</sub> Laser on Drug-Resistant Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Pilot Study
DOI:10.1089/photob.2023.0023
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ritto 2022
Arthrocentesis versus nonsurgical methods in the management of temporomandibular joint closed lock and pain: a double-blind randomized…
DOI:10.1016/j.oooo.2021.06.020
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ritto 2022
Arthrocentesis versus nonsurgical methods in the management of temporomandibular joint closed lock and pain: a double-blind randomized…
PMID:34373214
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rodrigues 2019
Effects of low-power laser auriculotherapy on the physical and emotional aspects in patients with temporomandibular disorders: A blind,…
DOI:10.1016/j.ctim.2018.12.010
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rodrigues 2019
Effects of low-power laser auriculotherapy on the physical and emotional aspects in patients with temporomandibular disorders: A blind,…
PMID:30670264
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rodríguez de Rivera-Campillo 2010
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPain intensitynot extracted yet
Rodríguez de Rivera-Campillo 2010
Response to topical clonazepam in patients with burning mouth syndrome: a clinical study.
PMID:22750263
2010this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sahoo 2023
Comparison of pain reduction using occlusal splints and low-level laser therapy in patients with temporomandibular disorders – A clinical…
DOI:10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_349_22
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Saini 2025
Effectiveness of continuous and pulse mode of ultrasound therapy in temporomandibular disorders associated myalgia—a randomized controlled…
DOI:10.22514/jofph.2025.007
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Saini 2025
Effectiveness of continuous and pulse mode of ultrasound therapy in temporomandibular disorders associated myalgia-a randomized controlled…
PMID:40129425
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Saisanen 2022
Efficacy and tolerability in patients with chronic facial pain of two consecutive treatment periods of rTMS applied over the facial motor…
DOI:10.1016/j.neucli.2022.03.001
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Saisanen 2022
Efficacy and tolerability in patients with chronic facial pain of two consecutive treatment periods of rTMS applied over the facial motor…
PMID:35339350
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sardella 2008
<i>Hypericum perforatum</i> extract in burning mouth syndrome: a randomized placebo‐controlled study
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0714.2008.00663.x
2008this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sardella 2008
Hypericum perforatum extract in burning mouth syndrome: a randomized placebo-controlled study.
PMID:18331283
2008this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sen 2020
Comparison of acupuncture on specific and non‐specific points for the treatment of painful temporomandibular disorders: A randomised…
DOI:10.1111/joor.12952
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sen 2020
Comparison of acupuncture on specific and non-specific points for the treatment of painful temporomandibular disorders: A randomised…
PMID:32077514
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shehata 2013
Botulinum toxin-type A: could it be an effective treatment option in intractable trigeminal neuralgia?
DOI:10.1186/1129-2377-14-92
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shousha 2021
Effects of low-level laser therapy versus soft occlusive splints on mouth opening and surface electromyography in females with…
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0258063
2021this review onlyPain intensity; Jaw functionnot extracted yet
Shukla 2025
Adjunctive 810 nm photobiomodulation with pharmacotherapy for trigeminal neuralgia: A randomized controlled trial in a tertiary care centre
DOI:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2025.113249
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shukla 2025
Adjunctive 810 nm photobiomodulation with pharmacotherapy for trigeminal neuralgia: A randomized controlled trial in a tertiary care centre.
PMID:40907240
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sielski 2025
Single intra-articular administration of injectable platelet-rich fibrin (I-PRF) in alleviating temporomandibular joint pain: A pilot…
PMID:40043084
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sikora 2018
The Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Burning Mouth Syndrome – A Pilot Study
DOI:10.20471/acc.2018.57.02.12
2018this review onlyPain intensitynot extracted yet
Sikora 2018
The Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Therapy in Burning Mouth Syndrome - A Pilot Study.
PMID:30431725
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Silvestre 2012
Application of a capsaicin rinse in the treatment of burning mouth syndrome.
PMID:21743415
2012this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Simon 2020
Short-term comparison of the 660 and 830 nm laser in the treatment of temporomandibular dysfunction – a randomized clinical trial
DOI:10.15584/ejcem.2020.4.1
2021this review onlyPain intensitynot extracted yet
Singh 2021
Evaluation of Arthrocentesis with and Without Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Management of Internal Derangement of Temporomandibular Joint: A…
DOI:10.1007/s12663-019-01320-y
2019this review onlyPain intensity; Jaw functionnot extracted yet
Sitnikova 2024
Clinical benefit of botulinum toxin for treatment of persistent <scp>TMD</scp>‐related myofascial pain: A randomized, placebo‐controlled,…
DOI:10.1111/papr.13396
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sitnikova 2024
Clinical benefit of botulinum toxin for treatment of persistent TMD-related myofascial pain: A randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over…
PMID:38963228
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Škrinjar 2020
Salivary Cortisol Levels and Burning Symptoms in Patients with Burning Mouth Syndrome before and after Low Level Laser Therapy: a Double…
DOI:10.15644/asc54/1/5
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Škrinjar 2020
Salivary Cortisol Levels and Burning Symptoms in Patients with Burning Mouth Syndrome before and after Low Level Laser Therapy: a Double…
PMID:32523156
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Spanemberg 2015
Efficacy of low-level laser therapy for the treatment of burning mouth syndrome: a randomized, controlled trial
DOI:10.1117/1.jbo.20.9.098001
2015this review onlyPain intensity; Quality of lifenot extracted yet
Spanemberg 2015
Efficacy of low-level laser therapy for the treatment of burning mouth syndrome: a randomized, controlled trial.
PMID:26359814
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Spanemberg 2019
Low-level laser therapy in patients with Burning Mouth Syndrome: A double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial.
PMID:30805121
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sugaya 2016
Low Intensity laser therapy in patients with burning mouth syndrome: a randomized, placebo-controlled study
DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2016.vol30.0108
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sugaya 2016
Low Intensity laser therapy in patients with burning mouth syndrome: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.
PMID:27737361
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Thepsoparn 2024
Efficacy and safety profile of Onabotulinum toxin-A injection at sphenopalatine ganglion in trigeminal neuralgia: a prospective…
DOI:10.1186/s10194-024-01926-9
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Thepsoparn 2024
Efficacy and safety profile of Onabotulinum toxin-A injection at sphenopalatine ganglion in trigeminal neuralgia: a prospective…
PMID:39623300
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Turk 1993
Effects of intraoral appliance and biofeedback/stress management alone and in combination in treating pain and depression in patients with…
DOI:10.1016/0022-3913(93)90012-d
1993this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Turk 1993
Effects of intraoral appliance and biofeedback/stress management alone and in combination in treating pain and depression in patients with…
PMID:8371179
1993this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Turner 2006
Short- and long-term efficacy of brief cognitive-behavioral therapy for patients with chronic temporomandibular disorder pain: A…
DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2005.11.017
2006this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Turner 2006
Short- and long-term efficacy of brief cognitive-behavioral therapy for patients with chronic temporomandibular disorder pain: a…
PMID:16495014
2006this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Umezaki 2016
The Efficacy of Daily Prefrontal Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for Burning Mouth Syndrome (BMS): A Randomized…
DOI:10.1016/j.brs.2015.10.005
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Umezaki 2016
The Efficacy of Daily Prefrontal Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) for Burning Mouth Syndrome (BMS): A Randomized…
PMID:26597930
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
van Soest 2025
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Botulinum Toxin for Temporomandibular-Related Myalgia: A Prospective Study.
PMID:41226892
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Venancio 2005
Low intensity laser therapy in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders: a double‐blind study
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01516.x
2005this review onlyPain intensitynot extracted yet
Venezian 2010
Low Level Laser Effects On Pain to Palpation and Electromyographic Activity in TMD Patients: A Double-Blind, Randomized,…
DOI:10.1179/crn.2010.012
2010this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Vingender 2023
Evaluation of the efficiency of hyaluronic acid, PRP and I-PRF intra-articular injections in the treatment of internal derangement of the…
PMID:36740515
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wang 2021
Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation with Different Puncture Methods for Treatment of V1 Trigeminal Neuralgia: A…
PMID:33740347
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wu 2012
Botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
DOI:10.1177/0333102412441721
2012this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yassaei 2025
Comparison of the Effect of 810 nm Diode Laser and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Relieving Symptoms of Patients With…
PMID:40330508
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yildiz 2024
A Comparison Between the Efficacy of Trigeminal Ganglion Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation and Ultrasound-Guided Maxillary-Mandibular Nerve…
PMID:38962582
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yu 2025
Clinical Efficacy of Acupuncture Combined With Manual Therapy in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders Myalgia and Observation of…
DOI:10.1111/joor.70090
2025this review onlyPain intensity; Jaw functionnot extracted yet
Yu 2025
Clinical Efficacy of Acupuncture Combined With Manual Therapy in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Disorders Myalgia and Observation of…
PMID:41116718
2026this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zarate 2020
Dextrose Prolotherapy Versus Lidocaine Injection for Temporomandibular Dysfunction: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
DOI:10.1089/acm.2020.0207
2020this review onlyPain intensitynot extracted yet
Zarate 2020
Dextrose Prolotherapy Versus Lidocaine Injection for Temporomandibular Dysfunction: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.
PMID:32780636
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zhang 2014
Two doses of botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: observation of therapeutic effect from a randomized,…
DOI:10.1186/1129-2377-15-65
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zhang 2017
Single-dose botulinum toxin type a compared with repeated-dose for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a pilot study
DOI:10.1186/s10194-017-0793-3
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zhang 2017
Single-dose botulinum toxin type a compared with repeated-dose for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a pilot study.
PMID:28799056
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zhang 2024
Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in the treatment of masticatory myositis and temporomandibular joint synovitis: A clinical trial
DOI:10.1016/j.jormas.2023.101632
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zhang 2024
Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound in the treatment of masticatory myositis and temporomandibular joint synovitis: A clinical trial.
PMID:37703917
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

ReviewShared studiesJaccard
A meta-analysis of pain intensity changes after placebo interventions in facial pain. (2026)120.03
Comparative effectiveness of nonpharmacological therapies for adult myogenic temporomandibular disorders: a network meta-analysis of… (2026)110.04
Conservative and Minimally Invasive Treatments for Temporomandibular Disorders Versus Inactive Controls: A Systematic Review and… (2026)110.04
Efficacy and Safety of Intra-Articular Therapies for Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2026)70.03
Comparative efficacy of arthrocentesis combined with different drug injections for arthrogenic temporomandibular disorders: a network… (2026)50.02
Efficacy of combined therapies on degenerative joint disease of the temporomandibular joint: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (2026)50.02
Effectiveness of arthrocentesis versus other therapeutic modalities in patients with temporomandibular disorders. Systematic review and… (2026)40.01
Effectiveness of manual therapy, exercise, low-level laser therapy, ultrasound, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in… (2026)40.02
Botulinum Toxin Type A for Trigeminal and Postherpetic Neuralgia: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews. (2026)30.01
The importance of power in photobiomodulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-intensity laser therapy. (2026)30.01
Effectiveness of laser photobiomodulation in the management of trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2026)20.01
Comparison and ranking of interventions for temporomandibular disorders-myofascial pain syndrome: a Bayesian network meta-analysis based… (2026)20.01
Innovative Didactic Learning Formats: Have They Improved Dental Education? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2026)10.00
Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Fibrin for Temporomandibular Disorders Management: A Systematic and Meta-Analysis. (2026)10.00
Efficacy of CBCT and Conventional Radiography in Identifying Bone Invasion in Oral Cancer - A Comparative Systematic Review. (2025)10.00
Comparative efficacy of novel biomaterials versus traditional materials in the treatment of dental and pulpal diseases: a systematic… (2026)10.00
Diagnostic and Prognostic Significance of Chemokines in Head and Neck Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2026)10.00
Arthrocentesis Plus Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin in Patients With Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction: An Updated Meta-Analysis With… (2026)10.00
Glucosamine supplementation in the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2026)10.00

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdults (18 years or older) with chronic or recurrent orofacial pain: temporomandibular disorders, burning mouth syndrome, trigeminal neuralgia and other trigeminal neuropathic pain, persistent idiopathic facial painAdults with chronic or recurrent orofacial pain (n=130 studies; 6879 participants): TMD (n=79), BMS (n=29), TN (n=19), neuropathic or mixed facial pain (n=1), other facial pain phenotypes (n=2)
InterventionAdvanced modalities (neuromodulation, PBM/LLLT, minimally invasive procedures and injectables, pharmacological or biologic agents) and complementary or integrative approaches (acupuncture and needling, manual therapy, structured psychological interventions, multimodal programs)PBM/LLLT; manual therapy and dry needling; acupuncture; neuromodulation and electrotherapy; injectables and intra-articular procedures; radiofrequency; pharmacological agents and supplements; digital therapeutics
ComparisonSham or placebo, usual care, wait-list or no intervention, and active comparators (coded as inactive control versus active comparator)Sham or inactive control; active comparators; no comparator in non-randomized studies
OutcomesPain intensity (primary); pain interference or disability, jaw function, quality of life, global improvement, medication use, adverse eventsPain intensity (VAS most common); jaw function; quality of life; adverse events (not reported in 37 of 130 studies)
Study designsRandomized controlled trials (parallel and crossover) for pooling; non-randomized intervention studies retained for narrative evidence map; English full textsParallel RCTs (n=105); crossover RCTs (n=9); non-randomized intervention studies (n=16)
TimingShort-term (up to 4 weeks), mid-term (more than 4 to 12 weeks), long-term (more than 12 weeks)Predominantly short-term follow-up; pooled windows short-term, mid-term and long-term

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedYesYesyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalYesYesyes
8Included studies described in detailYesYesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: YesNRSI: Yes · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsYesYesyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallLowLowyes