Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM41816993

Efficacy and Safety of Intra-Articular Therapies for Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Dos Santos Mateus Gaya, da Rosa Wellington Luiz de Oliveira, Sbardelotto Cristian, et al. · Oral diseases · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1111/odi.70284

Findings

Population Adults with painful articular TMD (TMJ osteoarthritis and/or internal derangement)

19 findings

Intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA), alone or with arthrocentesisBaseline (pre-treatment, T0)Maximum mouth opening (MMO)
6 months (T6) versus baseline (T0)
MD 8.32 [5.58, 11.06]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
4 studies · 81 participants
Intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA), alone or with arthrocentesisBaseline (pre-treatment, T0)Pain intensity (VAS)
6 months (T6) versus baseline (T0)
MD 4.85 [3.99, 5.71]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
4 studies · 81 participants
Intra-articular HA combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP), with arthrocentesisBaseline (pre-treatment, T0)Maximum mouth opening (MMO)
6 months (T6) versus baseline (T0)
MD 10.1 [8.31, 11.89]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
1 study · 10 participants
Intra-articular HA combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP), with arthrocentesisBaseline (pre-treatment, T0)Pain intensity (VAS)
6 months (T6) versus baseline (T0)
MD 5.1 [4.52, 5.68]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
1 study · 10 participants
Intra-articular PRP, with arthrocentesisBaseline (pre-treatment, T0)Maximum mouth opening (MMO)
6 months (T6) versus baseline (T0)
MD 10.46 [6.02, 14.89]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
2 studies · 40 participants
Intra-articular PRP, with arthrocentesisBaseline (pre-treatment, T0)Pain intensity (VAS)
6 months (T6) versus baseline (T0)
MD 4.99 [3.13, 6.85]
Moderate
Downgraded: imprecision
2 studies · 40 participants
Intra-articular opioids (morphine and tramadol), with arthrocentesisBaseline (pre-treatment, T0)Pain intensity (VAS)
6 months (T6) versus baseline (T0)
MD 5.93 [5.03, 6.83]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 20 participants
Intra-articular opioids (morphine and tramadol), with arthrocentesisBaseline (pre-treatment, T0)Maximum mouth opening (MMO)
6 months (T6) versus baseline (T0)
MD 3.34 [-0.87, 7.65]
Low
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
1 study · 20 participants
Intra-articular 10% dextrose (prolotherapy)Baseline (pre-treatment, T0)Pain intensity (VAS)
6 months (T6) versus baseline (T0)
MD 3.07 [2.47, 3.67]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 22 participants
Intra-articular 10% dextrose (prolotherapy)Pre-treatment baseline (T0), within-group comparisonPain intensity (VAS), reduction from baseline
6 months (T6) vs baseline (T0) · TMJ, minimally invasive procedures · Ultrasound-guided injection (US+)
MD 3.57 [2.36, 4.78]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 11 participants
Intra-articular 10% dextrose (prolotherapy)Pre-treatment baseline (T0), within-group comparisonPain intensity (VAS), reduction from baseline
6 months (T6) vs baseline (T0) · TMJ, minimally invasive procedures · Non-ultrasound-guided injection (US-)
MD 2.91 [2.22, 3.60]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 11 participants
Intra-articular tenoxicam (NSAID), with arthrocentesisBaseline (pre-treatment, T0)Maximum mouth opening (MMO)
6 months (T6) versus baseline (T0)
MD 11.5 [7.53, 15.47]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
1 study · 16 participants
Intra-articular tenoxicam (NSAID), with arthrocentesisBaseline (pre-treatment, T0)Pain intensity (VAS)
6 months (T6) versus baseline (T0)
MD 7.44 [6.28, 8.6]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 16 participants
Arthrocentesis with Ringer's lactate (RL)Baseline (pre-treatment, T0)Maximum mouth opening (MMO)
6 months (T6) versus baseline (T0)
MD 8.09 [4.41, 11.76]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
4 studies · 69 participants
Arthrocentesis with Ringer's lactate (RL)Baseline (pre-treatment, T0)Pain intensity (VAS)
6 months (T6) versus baseline (T0)
MD 4.84 [4.39, 5.29]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
4 studies · 69 participants
Arthrocentesis and/or intra-articular injection with any substance (all pooled)Baseline (pre-treatment, T0)Pain intensity (VAS)
6 months (T6) versus baseline (T0)
MD 4.97 [4.45, 6.46]
GRADE not reported
7 studies · 258 participants
Arthrocentesis and/or intra-articular injection with any substance (all pooled)Baseline (pre-treatment, T0)Maximum mouth opening (MMO)
6 months (T6) versus baseline (T0)
MD 8.58 [7.01, 10.14]
GRADE not reported
6 studies · 236 participants
One intra-articular HA injectionBaseline (pre-treatment, T0)Pain intensity (VAS)
6 months (T6) versus baseline (T0) · one HA injection
MD 4.95 [3.33, 6.58]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 38 participants
Two intra-articular HA injectionsBaseline (pre-treatment, T0)Pain intensity (VAS)
6 months (T6) versus baseline (T0) · two HA injections
MD 4.71 [3.58, 5.84]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 43 participants

Included primary studies 30

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Karadayi 2021
Randomised controlled trial of arthrocentesis with or without PRF for internal derangement of the TMJ.
PMID:33581954
20214 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Comert Kilic and Gungormus 2016b
Is arthrocentesis plus platelet-rich plasma superior to arthrocentesis plus hyaluronic acid for the treatment of temporomandibular joint…
PMID:27364372
20163 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Isik 2022
Injectable platelet-rich fibrin as treatment for temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
PMID:35798596
20223 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Bayramoglu 2023
Does intra-articular injection of tenoxicam after arthrocentesis heal outcomes of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis? A randomized…
PMID:36890529
20232 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Bergstrand 2019
Long-term effectiveness of arthrocentesis with and without hyaluronic acid injection for treatment of temporomandibular joint…
PMID:30814387
20192 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Comert Kilic 2015
Is Arthrocentesis Plus Platelet-Rich Plasma Superior to Arthrocentesis Alone in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis? A…
PMID:25976690
20152 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Comert Kilic 2021
Does glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, and methylsulfonylmethane supplementation improve the outcome of temporomandibular joint…
PMID:33685850
20212 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Dasukil 2022
Intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid versus platelet-rich plasma following single puncture arthrocentesis for the management of…
PMID:36372680
20222 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Isik 2023
Does the Use of Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin After Arthrocentesis for Disc Displacement Without Reduction Improve Clinical Outcomes?
PMID:36924792
20232 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Alhaj Kheder 2024
Ultrasound-Guided Vs Non-Guided Prolotherapy for Internal Derangement of Temporomandibular Joint. A Randomized Clinical Trial.
PMID:38581185
20241 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Asadpour 2022
Combined Platelet-Rich Plasma and Hyaluronic Acid can Reduce Pain in Patients Undergoing Arthrocentesis for Temporomandibular Joint…
PMID:35679902
20221 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Bertolami 1993
Use of sodium hyaluronate in treating temporomandibular joint disorders: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
PMID:8445463
19931 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Comert Kilic and Gungormus 2016a
Is dextrose prolotherapy superior to placebo for the treatment of temporomandibular joint hypermobility? A randomized clinical trial.
PMID:26846795
20161 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Hegab 2015
Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection as an Effective Treatment for Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis.
PMID:25882438
20151 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Isacsson 2019
Pain relief following a single-dose intra-articular injection of methylprednisolone in the temporomandibular joint arthralgia-A…
PMID:30240024
20191 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Olsen-Bergem 2014
A cohort study of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and arthritis of the temporomandibular joint: outcome of arthrocentesis with…
PMID:24794763
20141 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Ozdamar 2017
The impact of arthrocentesis with and without hyaluronic acid injection in the prognosis and synovial fluid myeloperoxidase levels of…
PMID:27973684
20171 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Sipahi 2015
Comparative study in patients with symptomatic internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint: analgesic outcomes of arthrocentesis…
PMID:25623934
20151 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Yilmaz 2019
Comparison of treatment efficacy between hyaluronic acid and arthrocentesis plus hyaluronic acid in internal derangements of…
PMID:31451342
20191 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Ayesh 2008
Effects of intra-articular ketamine on pain and somatosensory function in temporomandibular joint arthralgia patients.
PMID:17923328
2008this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Castano-Joaqui 2021
TMJ arthroscopy with hyaluronic acid: A 12-month randomized clinical trial.
PMID:32609918
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Fernandez-Ferro 2017
Comparison of intra-articular injection of plasma rich in growth factors versus hyaluronic acid following arthroscopy in the treatment of…
PMID:28237253
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Guarda-Nardini 2015
Single- or multiple-session viscosupplementation protocols for temporomandibular joint degenerative disorders: a randomized clinical trial.
PMID:25704621
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Haggag 2022
Dextrose prolotherapy for pain and dysfunction of the TMJ reducible disc displacement: A randomized, double-blind clinical study.
PMID:35501215
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hegab 2023
Synergistic effect of platelet rich plasma with hyaluronic acid injection following arthrocentesis to reduce pain and improve function in…
PMID:36414172
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hepguler 2002
The efficacy of intra-articular sodium hyaluronate in patients with reducing displaced disc of the temporomandibular joint.
PMID:11844036
2002this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Huddleston Slater 2012
Randomized trial on the effectiveness of dexamethasone in TMJ arthrocentesis.
PMID:22157100
2012this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Korkmaz 2016
Is Hyaluronic Acid Injection Effective for the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Disc Displacement With Reduction?
PMID:27058964
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mustafa 2018
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Different Concentrations of Dextrose Prolotherapy in Temporomandibular Joint Hypermobility Treatment.
PMID:29533255
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Patel 2016
Sodium hyaluronate: an effective adjunct in temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis.
PMID:27714459
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationIndividuals diagnosed with painful articular TMD (TMJ osteoarthritis and/or internal derangement; DC/TMD, Wilkes, Helkimo or Hegab criteria)Patients with TMJ osteoarthritis or internal derangement who had failed conservative treatment (30 RCTs; 71% women, mean age 32 years in the meta-analysis)
InterventionMinimally invasive TMJ procedures: any intra-articular injection alone or with arthrocentesisHA (n=81 pooled), HA + PRP (n=10), PRP (n=40), opioids morphine and tramadol (n=20), dextrose 10% (n=22), tenoxicam (n=16), Ringer's lactate (n=69); qualitative: ketamine, corticosteroids, saline, PRF/PRGF, dextrose 20% to 30%
ComparisonPre-treatment (baseline, T0) versus post-treatment within-group comparisonsBaseline (T0) within-group; between-group comparisons only described qualitatively
OutcomesPain intensity (VAS) and maximum mouth opening (MMO); adverse events when reportedVAS pain (7 RCTs pooled) and MMO (6 RCTs pooled) at 6 months; adverse events (Table 2)
Study designsRandomized clinical trials30 RCTs (7 in meta-analysis, 23 qualitative); RoB 2: 60% low risk, 40% some concerns
TimingFollow-up of at least 1 month; meta-analysis restricted to 6-month follow-up (T0 vs T6)6 months for meta-analysis; 24 hours to 47 months in qualitative studies