Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42058481

Pharmacological Interventions in the Management of Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Pereira Cristiana Palmela, Serra Beatriz, Martins João Paulo · Acta stomatologica Croatica · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.15644/asc60/1/2

Findings

70 findings

Population
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined · Age: <40 years
SMD 0.37 [0.04, 0.70]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Age: >=40 years
SMD -1.21 [-2.36, -0.07]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Intervention strategy: Surgery + less invasive
SMD -0.51 [-1.27, 0.24]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined · Group of countries: Europe + USA
SMD 0.87 [0.09, 1.65]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Group of countries: India
SMD -0.89 [-1.33, -0.45]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined · Intervention strategy: Surgery + less invasive
SMD 0.44 [-0.14, 0.56]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Type of intervention: Mechanic
SMD -0.61 [-0.95, -0.27]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Type of intervention: Surgery + intra-articular injection of drugs
SMD -0.72 [-1.62, 0.18]
GRADE not reported
7 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Age: <40 years
SMD -0.40 [-0.71, -0.09]
GRADE not reported
15 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · TMD scale: DC/TMD
SMD -0.76 [-1.69, 0.18]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Presence of dysfunction: Yes
SMD -0.62 [-1.04, -0.20]
GRADE not reported
20 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined · Sex: >=80% female
SMD 0.32 [-0.03, 0.66]
GRADE not reported
9 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Type of intervention: Pharmacology
SMD -1.11 [-2.93, 0.71]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Active principle: Platelet-rich factors
SMD -0.73 [-1.26, -0.20]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined · TMD scale: DC/TMD
SMD 0.30 [-0.25, 0.80]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined · Age: >=40 years
SMD 1.33 [1.02, 1.64]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined · Type of pain: Myalgia
SMD 0.98 [0.35, 1.61]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Active principle: Corticosteroids
SMD -0.35 [-0.70, 0.00]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Intervention strategy: Less invasive
SMD -0.72 [-1.11, -0.32]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Presence of dysfunction: No
SMD -0.91 [-2.09, 0.27]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
SMD -0.68 [-1.09, -0.26]
GRADE not reported
17 studies · 1128 participants
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Type of pain: Arthralgia
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
SMD -0.38 [-0.61, -0.15]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
11 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Group of countries: Muslim countries
SMD -0.75 [-1.53, 0.03]
GRADE not reported
10 studies
Adolescents and adults (12 years or older) with myalgia or arthralgia related to temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (NSAIDs, corticosteroids, muscle relaxants, antidepressants, platelet-rich products, hyaluronate, other intra-articular injectables), alone or as adjunct to other treatmentPlacebo or other active treatments (saline, splint, arthrocentesis, arthroscopy, other drugs)Maximum interincisal opening (MIO), unassisted
Multiple post-baseline time points combined per study (multilevel random-effects, BLUP) · Nine countries (Europe, USA, Turkey, Egypt, India, Brazil) · Overall pooled effect
SMD 0.51 [0.2, 0.82]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
12 studies · 786 participants
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Type of pain: Myalgia
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
SMD -0.85 [-1.68, -0.01]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
7 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · TMD scale: RDC/TMD
SMD -0.49 [-1.50, 0.51]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined · Intervention strategy: Less invasive
SMD 0.45 [-0.14, 1.04]
GRADE not reported
7 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Type of pain: Arthralgia + Myalgia
SMD -0.46 [-1.80, 0.89]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined · Group of countries: Brazil
SMD 0.70 [0.20, 1.20]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Group of countries: Europe + USA
SMD -0.37 [-0.78, 0.05]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Sex: <80% female
SMD -0.69 [-0.87, -0.51]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Active principle: Others
SMD -0.80 [-1.57, -0.03]
GRADE not reported
13 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined · Group of countries: Muslim countries
SMD 0.21 [-0.15, 0.56]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined · Type of pain: Arthralgia
SMD 0.31 [-0.08, 0.70]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Intervention strategy: Conservative
SMD -0.89 [-1.30, -0.09]
GRADE not reported
10 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined · Sex: <80% female
SMD 0.76 [0.27, 1.25]
GRADE not reported
7 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · TMD scale: Wilkes classification
SMD -1.07 [-2.21, 0.06]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Sex: >=80% female
SMD -0.62 [-1.22, -0.01]
GRADE not reported
15 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined · Intervention strategy: Conservative
SMD 0.98 [0.47, 1.49]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined · TMD scale: RDC/TMD
SMD -0.11 [-0.37, 0.15]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Type of intervention: Intra-articular injection of drugs
SMD -0.72 [-1.11, -0.32]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Sensitivity: excluding high risk of bias studies (RoB 2)
SMD -0.48 [-0.82, -0.14]
GRADE not reported
20 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined · Sensitivity: excluding high risk of bias studies (RoB 2)
SMD 0.55 [0.19, 0.90]
GRADE not reported
13 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined · TMD scale: Wilkes classification
SMD 0.57 [0.16, 0.98]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adolescents and adults with temporomandibular disorders (myalgia, arthralgia or mixed)Pharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Group of countries: Brazil
SMD -0.98 [-2.37, 0.41]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with arthralgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined
SMD -0.38 [-0.57, -0.18]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with arthralgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · TMD scale: RDC/TMD
SMD -0.11 [-0.27, 0.05]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with arthralgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Intervention strategy: Conservative
SMD -0.34 [-0.64, -0.05]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with arthralgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Intervention strategy: Less invasive
SMD -0.64 [-0.94, -0.34]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with arthralgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · TMD scale: DC/TMD
SMD -0.39 [-0.57, -0.21]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with arthralgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Type of intervention: Surgery + intra-articular injection of drugs
SMD -0.08 [-0.29, 0.13]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with arthralgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Active principle: Platelet-rich factors
SMD -0.65 [-1.06, -0.24]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with arthralgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Sex: >=80% female
SMD -0.26 [-0.43, -0.08]
GRADE not reported
8 studies
Adults with arthralgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Group of countries: Muslim countries
SMD -0.24 [-0.36, -0.13]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adults with arthralgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined · Sex: <80% female
SMD 0.90 [0.39, 1.41]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with arthralgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Active principle: Others
SMD -0.25 [-0.44, -0.06]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adults with arthralgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined · Intervention strategy: Surgery + less invasive
SMD -0.12 [-0.42, 0.17]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with arthralgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined · Intervention strategy: Less invasive
SMD 0.42 [-0.15, 0.99]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with arthralgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined · Sex: >=80% female
SMD -0.07 [-0.30, 0.15]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Adults with arthralgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Intervention strategy: Surgery + less invasive
SMD -0.10 [-0.30, 0.10]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with arthralgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Sex: <80% female
SMD -0.65 [-1.06, -0.24]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with arthralgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Type of intervention: Intra-articular injection of drugs
SMD -0.64 [-0.94, -0.34]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with arthralgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Group of countries: Europe + USA
SMD -0.29 [-0.66, 0.09]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with arthralgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined
SMD 0.19 [-0.20, 0.57]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with myalgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Age: <40 years
SMD -0.33 [-1.12, 0.47]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with myalgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Sex: >=80% female
SMD -1.00 [-2.99, 0.99]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with myalgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Age: >=40 years
SMD -1.56 [-2.95, -0.17]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adults with myalgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined · Sex: <80% female
SMD -0.74 [-0.99, -0.49]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adults with myalgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Pain intensity (VAS)
All post-baseline time points combined
SMD -0.83 [-1.67, 0.02]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with myalgia-only temporomandibular disordersPharmacological interventions (alone or as adjunct to conservative or surgical procedures)Placebo or active comparators (e.g. occlusal splint, arthrocentesis, saline)Maximum interincisal opening (unassisted)
All post-baseline time points combined
SMD 0.96 [0.28, 1.63]
GRADE not reported
4 studies

Included primary studies 27

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Pereira 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NR2 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Yapici-Yavuz 2018
A comparison of the effects of Methylprednisolone Acetate, Sodium Hyaluronate and Tenoxicam in the treatment of non-reducing disc…
PMID:29680845
20182 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Chandra 2021
Minimally invasive intraarticular platelet rich plasma injection for refractory temporomandibular joint dysfunction syndrome in comparison…
PMID:34017736
20211 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Isacsson 2019
Pain relief following a single-dose intra-articular injection of methylprednisolone in the temporomandibular joint arthralgia-A…
PMID:30240024
20191 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Batabyal 2023
Graft patency after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery surgery in high-risk patients.
PMID:20233137
2010this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bechir 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bilici 2018
Evaluation of the effects of occlusal splint, trigger point injection and arthrocentesis in the treatment of internal derangement patients…
DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2018.03.018
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bilici 2018
Evaluation of the effects of occlusal splint, trigger point injection and arthrocentesis in the treatment of internal derangement patients…
PMID:29692327
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Dalewski 2019
Comparison of Early Effectiveness of Three Different Intervention Methods in Patients with Chronic Orofacial Pain: A Randomized,…
DOI:10.1155/2019/7954291
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Dalewski 2019
Comparison of Early Effectiveness of Three Different Intervention Methods in Patients with Chronic Orofacial Pain: A Randomized,…
PMID:30984320
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Dordevic 2019
Occlusal appliances - an alternative in temporomandibular disorders
DOI:10.2298/sarh190118064d
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ferreira 2023
Prediction of duloxetine efficacy in addition to self‐management in painful temporomandibular disorders: A randomised, placebo‐controlled…
DOI:10.1111/joor.13628
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ferreira 2024
Prediction of duloxetine efficacy in addition to self-management in painful temporomandibular disorders: A randomised, placebo-controlled…
PMID:37994185
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gibaly 2024
Evaluation of the effect of dextrose prolotherapy versus deep dry needling therapy for the treatment of temporomandibular joint anterior…
DOI:10.1007/s00784-024-05830-z
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gibaly 2024
Evaluation of the effect of dextrose prolotherapy versus deep dry needling therapy for the treatment of temporomandibular joint anterior…
PMID:39115583
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Isacsson 2018
Pain relief following a single‐dose intra‐articular injection of methylprednisolone in the temporomandibular joint arthralgia—A…
DOI:10.1111/joor.12718
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Martins 2023
Assessment of postoperative pain in patients undergoing temporomandibular joint arthroscopy with infiltration of dexamethasone disodium…
DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2023.02.001
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Martins 2023
Assessment of postoperative pain in patients undergoing temporomandibular joint arthroscopy with infiltration of dexamethasone disodium…
PMID:36774309
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mosleh 2021
Evaluation of the effect of intra-articular injection of macrolide antibiotics versus corticosteroids on internal derangement of…
DOI:10.21608/edj.2021.82698.1692
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mosleh 2024
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Treatment of temporomandibular joint internal derangement using MESNA injection
DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-04615-w
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mosleh 2024
Treatment of temporomandibular joint internal derangement using MESNA injection.
PMID:39098893
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Pereira 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tchivileva 2020
Efficacy and safety of propranolol for treatment of temporomandibular disorder pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial
DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001882
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tchivileva 2020
Efficacy and safety of propranolol for treatment of temporomandibular disorder pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
PMID:32701836
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tepecik 2024
Does the Use of Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin Following Arthrocentesis for Disc Displacement Without Reduction Alleviate Pain?
DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2024.09.002
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tepecik 2024
Does the Use of Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin Following Arthrocentesis for Disc Displacement Without Reduction Alleviate Pain?
PMID:39366665
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Venepally 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdolescents and adults (12 years or older) diagnosed with myalgia related to TMD (local myalgia, myofascial pain, myofascial pain with referral)Adults and adolescents with TMD pain: arthralgia, myalgia, or both; 1,128 participants in 25 treatment arms from 17 RCTs; mean age 27.1 to 52.0 years; 40.9% to 100% female
InterventionPharmacological interventions: NSAIDs, corticosteroids, antidepressants, centrally acting muscle relaxants, anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines, local anesthetics, other analgesics, combination therapiesPlatelet-rich plasma, sodium hyaluronate, methylprednisolone acetate, tenoxicam, dexamethasone, nimesulide, injectable platelet-rich fibrin, ozone, propranolol, clorzoxazone, dextrose, azithromycin, lidocaine, duloxetine, MESNA, often with arthrocentesis, arthroscopy or splint (n=17 RCTs, 25 comparisons)
ComparisonPlacebo or other active interventions (saline, occlusal splints, intra-articular injectables), clearly definedPlacebo, saline, arthrocentesis, arthroscopy, interocclusal splint, other drugs (n=17 RCTs, 25 comparisons)
OutcomesPain intensity (VAS); maximum interincisal opening (mm); adverse events (secondary)Pain VAS (25 comparisons, SMD -0.68, 95% CI -1.09 to -0.26); MIO (12 RCTs, SMD 0.51, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.82); adverse events not pooled
Study designsRCTs reporting at least one quantitative myalgia outcome with validated pain scales, published 2018 to 202417 RCTs (25 comparisons) published 2018 to 2024 across nine countries
TimingNot specifiedMultiple post-baseline time points per study (1 to 7), combined by multilevel model

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalNoNoyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalPartial YesYesno
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesPartial Yesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: No · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsYesYesyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalYesYesyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowLowno