Primary study · included by 3 reviews

Randomised controlled trial of arthrocentesis with or without PRF for internal derangement of the TMJ

Karadayi 2021 · Karadayi Ugur, Gursoytrak Burcu · Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery · 2021

Included by

Advanced, pharmacological and complementary interventions for chronic or recurrent orofacial pain conditions: a systematic evidence map with selective meta-analyses.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Karadayi 2021 · Reference list (ref 174); Supplementary Table 4
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Pain intensity
Injectables / intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Long-term (more than 12 weeks)
SMD -0.46 [-0.85, -0.08]9 studies · 272 participantsGRADE not reported
Pain intensity
Injectables or intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Long-term (>12 weeks)
SMD -0.70 [-1.21, -0.19]NRGRADE not reported
Pain intensity
Injectables or intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks)
SMD -0.43 [-0.88, 0.03]6 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain intensity
Injectables / intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Long-term (more than 12 weeks)
SMD -0.44 [-0.66, -0.21]9 studies · 272 participantsGRADE not reported
Pain intensity
Injectables or intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks)
SMD -0.44 [-0.80, -0.08]6 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain intensity
Injectables or intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Long-term (>12 weeks)
SMD -0.53 [-0.92, -0.15]8 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain intensity
Injectables or intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Long-term (>12 weeks)
SMD -0.42 [-0.84, -0.01]8 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain intensity
Injectables or intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks)
SMD -0.28 [-0.50, -0.06]6 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain intensity
Injectables or intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Long-term (>12 weeks)
SMD -0.48 [-0.90, -0.06]8 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain intensity
Injectables / intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Short-term (immediate to 4 weeks)
SMD -0.40 [-0.73, -0.08]7 studies · 201 participantsGRADE not reported
Pain intensity
Injectables or intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks)
SMD -0.40 [-0.78, -0.03]6 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain intensity
Injectables or intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Long-term (>12 weeks)
SMD -0.46 [-0.85, -0.08]9 studies · 272 participantsVery low
Pain intensity
Injectables or intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Long-term (>12 weeks)
SMD -0.53 [-1.05, -0.01]8 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain intensity
Injectables or intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks)
SMD -0.40 [-0.73, -0.08]7 studies · 201 participantsLow
Pain intensity
Injectables or intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Long-term (>12 weeks)
SMD -0.55 [-0.88, -0.22]8 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain intensity
Injectables or intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Long-term (>12 weeks)
SMD -0.31 [-0.67, 0.06]8 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain intensity
Injectables or intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks)
SMD -0.46 [-0.81, -0.11]6 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain intensity
Injectables or intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks)
SMD -0.42 [-0.79, -0.05]6 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain intensity
Injectables or intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks)
SMD -0.40 [-0.78, -0.01]6 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain intensity
Injectables or intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Long-term (>12 weeks)
SMD -0.46 [-0.88, -0.04]8 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain intensity
Injectables / intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Short-term (immediate to 4 weeks)
SMD -0.41 [-0.67, -0.14]7 studies · 201 participantsGRADE not reported
Pain intensity
Injectables or intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Long-term (>12 weeks)
SMD -0.47 [-0.89, -0.05]8 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain intensity
Injectables or intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Short-term (immediate post-intervention to 4 weeks)
SMD -0.37 [-0.89, 0.15]NRGRADE not reported
Pain intensity
Injectables or intra-articular procedures vs Active comparator · Long-term (>12 weeks)
SMD -0.42 [-0.83, -0.01]8 studiesGRADE not reported
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Pain (VAS), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Follow-up 3 to 12 months
MD -1.57 [-2.36, -0.78]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain (VAS), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Follow-up 3 to 12 months
MD -1.68 [-2.46, -0.91]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain (VAS), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Follow-up 3 to 12 months
MD -1.86 [-2.35, -1.37]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Maximum mouth opening (MMO), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Follow-up 3 to 12 months
MD 5.39 [3.29, 7.5]6 studiesGRADE not reported
Maximum mouth opening (MMO), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Follow-up 3 to 12 months
MD 5.03 [2.99, 7.07]7 studies · 270 participantsModerate
Pain (VAS), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Not specified
MD -1.61 [-2.26, -0.95]2 studies · 112 participantsGRADE not reported
Pain (VAS), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · 6 months
MD -1.83 [-2.43, -1.24]2 studies · 70 participantsGRADE not reported
Pain (VAS), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Follow-up 3 to 12 months
Meta-regression coefficient 0.0232 [-0.2078, 0.2542]8 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain (VAS), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Not specified
MD -1.59 [-1.88, -1.3]2 studies · 112 participantsGRADE not reported
Pain (VAS), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Follow-up 3 to 12 months
MD -1.64 [-2.41, -0.86]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain (VAS), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Follow-up 3 to 12 months
MD -1.62 [-2.28, -0.96]8 studies · 298 participantsModerate
Pain (VAS), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Follow-up 3 to 12 months
MD -1.55 [-2.33, -0.77]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain (VAS), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Follow-up 3 to 12 months
MD -1.73 [-2.41, -1.05]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Maximum mouth opening (MMO), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Follow-up 3 to 12 months
MD 5.12 [2.87, 7.37]6 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain (VAS), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · 9-12 months
MD -1.13 [-2.13, -0.12]3 studies · 140 participantsGRADE not reported
Maximum mouth opening (MMO), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Follow-up 3 to 12 months
MD 3.94 [3.14, 4.73]6 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain (VAS), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Not specified
MD -1.66 [-2.18, -1.14]2 studies · 112 participantsGRADE not reported
Maximum mouth opening (MMO), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Follow-up 3 to 12 months
MD 4.85 [2.33, 7.38]6 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain (VAS), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Follow-up 3 to 12 months
MD -1.5 [-2.18, -0.81]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain (VAS), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · 3 months
MD -2.13 [-3.75, -0.51]3 studies · 88 participantsGRADE not reported
Maximum mouth opening (MMO), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Follow-up 3 to 12 months
MD 4.99 [2.5, 7.48]6 studiesGRADE not reported
Maximum mouth opening (MMO), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Follow-up 3 to 12 months
MD 5.51 [3.06, 7.96]6 studiesGRADE not reported
Maximum mouth opening (MMO), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Follow-up 3 to 12 months
MD 5.31 [2.66, 7.96]6 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain (VAS), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Follow-up 3 to 12 months
MD -1.44 [-2.06, -0.81]7 studiesGRADE not reported
Pain (VAS), change from baseline
Arthrocentesis plus injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) vs Control interventions (mainly arthrocentesis alone) · Not specified
MD -1.49 [-1.99, -0.99]2 studies · 112 participantsGRADE not reported
Efficacy of combined therapies on degenerative joint disease of the temporomandibular joint: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Karadayi 2021 · Supplement mmc1 Appendix C section A (RCTs in meta-analysis), A12

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

3 including reviews in total.