Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM41783054

Comparative efficacy of novel biomaterials versus traditional materials in the treatment of dental and pulpal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sheng Qing, Fan Guangwei, Lu Weiqing, et al. · Frontiers in medicine · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1762823

Findings

Population Teeth undergoing non-surgical root canal treatment (dental and pulpal disease)

14 findings

Bioceramic (calcium silicate) sealer, single-cone obturation (e.g., iRoot SP, Bio-C Sealer, C-Root SP)Epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus)Clinical and radiographic success rate
6-24 months · Endodontic root canal treatment
OR 1.12 [0.85, 1.47]
GRADE not reported
6 studies · 612 participants
Bioceramic (calcium silicate) sealer, single-cone obturation (e.g., iRoot SP, Bio-C Sealer, C-Root SP)Epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus)Apical sealing ability / microleakage
Endodontic root canal treatment · Supplementary Table 6 pooled value (no CI given)
SMD -2.35
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Bioceramic (calcium silicate) sealer, single-cone obturation (e.g., iRoot SP, Bio-C Sealer, C-Root SP)Epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus)Postoperative pain incidence (VAS >=4)
24-72 h postoperatively · Endodontic root canal treatment · 72 h subgroup
OR 0.38 [0.16, 0.90]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 162 participants
Bioceramic (calcium silicate) sealer, single-cone obturation (e.g., iRoot SP, Bio-C Sealer, C-Root SP)Epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus)Overfilling rate
Endodontic root canal treatment · Supplementary Table 7 pooled values
OR 2.47 [1.36, 4.49]
GRADE not reported
5 studies · 503 participants
Bioceramic (calcium silicate) sealer, single-cone obturation (e.g., iRoot SP, Bio-C Sealer, C-Root SP)Epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus)Postoperative pain incidence (VAS >=4)
24-72 h postoperatively · Endodontic root canal treatment · Supplementary Table 2 pooled values
OR 0.40 [0.31, 0.52]
GRADE not reported
12 studies · 1331 participants
Bioceramic (calcium silicate) sealer, single-cone obturation (e.g., iRoot SP, Bio-C Sealer, C-Root SP)Epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus)Postoperative pain incidence (VAS >=4)
24-72 h postoperatively · Endodontic root canal treatment
OR 0.48 [0.35, 0.66]
GRADE not reported
12 studies
Bioceramic (calcium silicate) sealer, single-cone obturation (e.g., iRoot SP, Bio-C Sealer, C-Root SP)Epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus)Postoperative pain incidence (VAS >=4)
24-72 h postoperatively · Endodontic root canal treatment · Time point subgroup analysis, overall
OR 0.39 [0.27, 0.56]
GRADE not reported
6 studies · 642 participants
Bioceramic (calcium silicate) sealer, single-cone obturation (e.g., iRoot SP, Bio-C Sealer, C-Root SP)Epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus)Postoperative pain incidence (VAS >=4)
24-72 h postoperatively · Endodontic root canal treatment · 24 h subgroup
OR 0.40 [0.23, 0.70]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 260 participants
Bioceramic (calcium silicate) sealer, single-cone obturation (e.g., iRoot SP, Bio-C Sealer, C-Root SP)Epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus)Postoperative pain incidence (VAS >=4)
24-72 h postoperatively · Endodontic root canal treatment · 48 h subgroup
OR 0.38 [0.20, 0.71]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 220 participants
Bioceramic (calcium silicate) sealer, single-cone obturation (e.g., iRoot SP, Bio-C Sealer, C-Root SP)Epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus)Clinical and radiographic success rate
6-24 months · Endodontic root canal treatment · Supplementary Table 11 pooled values
OR 1.41 [0.85, 2.34]
GRADE not reported
6 studies · 612 participants
Bioceramic (calcium silicate) sealer, single-cone obturation (e.g., iRoot SP, Bio-C Sealer, C-Root SP)Epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus)Retreatment difficulty
Endodontic root canal treatment · Supplementary Table 9 pooled values
SMD 1.52 [1.20, 1.84]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 238 participants
Bioceramic (calcium silicate) sealer, single-cone obturation (e.g., iRoot SP, Bio-C Sealer, C-Root SP)Epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus)Apical sealing ability / microleakage
Endodontic root canal treatment
SMD -1.35 [-1.78, -0.92]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Bioceramic (calcium silicate) sealer, single-cone obturation (e.g., iRoot SP, Bio-C Sealer, C-Root SP)Epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus)Retreatment difficulty
Endodontic root canal treatment
SMD 0.88 [0.25, 1.51]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Bioceramic (calcium silicate) sealer, single-cone obturation (e.g., iRoot SP, Bio-C Sealer, C-Root SP)Epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus)Overfilling rate
Endodontic root canal treatment
OR 1.85 [1.25, 2.74]
GRADE not reported
5 studies

Included primary studies 27

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Wang 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NR4 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Chen 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NR2 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Park 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Al-Hiyasat 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Al-Hiyasat AS 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPostoperative pain incidence (VAS >=4)not extracted yet
Alattas 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Alattas M 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPostoperative pain incidence (VAS >=4)not extracted yet
Almeida 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Almeida G 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPostoperative pain incidence (VAS >=4); Apical sealing ability / microleakage; Overfilling rate; Clinical and radiographic success ratenot extracted yet
Chen X 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPostoperative pain incidence (VAS >=4); Apical sealing ability / microleakage; Overfilling ratenot extracted yet
Fernandes 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Fernandes G 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyRetreatment difficultynot extracted yet
Jeong 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jeong JW 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPostoperative pain incidence (VAS >=4); Apical sealing ability / microleakage; Retreatment difficulty; Clinical and radiographic success ratenot extracted yet
Johnson 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Johnson K 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPostoperative pain incidence (VAS >=4)not extracted yet
Park S 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPostoperative pain incidence (VAS >=4)not extracted yet
Rodrigues 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rodrigues GV 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPostoperative pain incidence (VAS >=4); Apical sealing ability / microleakage; Overfilling ratenot extracted yet
Ruiz-Linares M 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyClinical and radiographic success ratenot extracted yet
Santos 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Santos P 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPostoperative pain incidence (VAS >=4); Clinical and radiographic success ratenot extracted yet
Talwar 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Talwar S 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyApical sealing ability / microleakage; Retreatment difficulty; Clinical and radiographic success ratenot extracted yet
Taylor 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Taylor R 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPostoperative pain incidence (VAS >=4); Overfilling ratenot extracted yet
Wang Z 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPostoperative pain incidence (VAS >=4); Apical sealing ability / microleakage; Overfilling rate; Clinical and radiographic success ratenot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients undergoing root canal treatment; excluded primary teeth, open apices and retreatment casesTeeth treated with root canal obturation (n=1,528; 768 bioceramic, 760 AH Plus)
InterventionNovel bioceramic (calcium silicate-based) sealers with the single-cone techniqueBioceramic sealers: iRoot SP (n=5 studies), Bio-C Sealer (n=4), C-Root SP (n=3), Total Fill BC Sealer (n=1), others (n=2)
ComparisonTraditional epoxy resin-based sealers (AH Plus)AH Plus (n=15 studies)
OutcomesPostoperative pain incidence, apical sealing ability, dentinal tubule penetration depth, overfilling, retreatment difficulty, success ratePostoperative pain (n=12 studies); apical sealing/microleakage (n=6); overfilling (n=5); retreatment difficulty (n=3); success rate (n=6)
Study designsRCTs and cohort studies11 RCTs and 4 prospective cohort studies
TimingNot specifiedSuccess follow-up 6-24 months; pain 24-72 h