Non-Cochrane · DTA · PM41726192

Efficacy of CBCT and Conventional Radiography in Identifying Bone Invasion in Oral Cancer - A Comparative Systematic Review.

Pillai Vedika, Nisa Shams Ul, Mhapuskar Amit, et al. · Annals of maxillofacial surgery · 2025 · PubMed · doi:10.4103/ams.ams_80_25

Findings

Population Patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma undergoing preoperative imaging for bone invasion

3 findings

Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)Conventional radiography (panoramic or periapical); reference standard histopathology or intraoperative findingsDiagnostic odds ratio
Preoperative imaging of OSCC
Diagnostic OR (4 studies, subset); inconsistent across studies
Moderate
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
4 studies
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)Conventional radiography (panoramic or periapical); reference standard histopathology or intraoperative findingsSensitivity (summary AUC)
Preoperative imaging of OSCC
AUC 0.59
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
9 studies
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)Conventional radiography (panoramic or periapical); reference standard histopathology or intraoperative findingsSpecificity
Preoperative imaging of OSCC
Specificity (60%-100%); generally high across studies
High
9 studies

Included primary studies 26

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Wang 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NR4 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Ramesh 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NR2 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Islam 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Aslan 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Czerwonka 2017
High-resolution cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of bone invasion in oral cancer: Comparison with conventional computed…
DOI:10.1002/hed.24858
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Czerwonka 2017
High-resolution cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of bone invasion in oral cancer: Comparison with conventional computed…
PMID:28703386
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hendrikx 2010
Cone-beam CT in the assessment of mandibular invasion by oral squamous cell carcinoma: results of the preliminary study
DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2010.02.008
2010this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hendrikx 2010
Cone-beam CT in the assessment of mandibular invasion by oral squamous cell carcinoma: results of the preliminary study.
PMID:20211543
2010this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hosen 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kolk 2014
Combined SPECT/CT improves detection of initial bone invasion and determination of resection margins in squamous cell carcinoma of the…
DOI:10.1007/s00259-014-2726-6
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kolk 2014
Combined SPECT/CT improves detection of initial bone invasion and determination of resection margins in squamous cell carcinoma of the…
PMID:24573657
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kouketsu 2021
Comparison of different diagnostic imaging techniques for the detection of bone invasion in oral cancers
DOI:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2021.105453
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kouketsu 2021
Comparison of different diagnostic imaging techniques for the detection of bone invasion in oral cancers.
PMID:34265573
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kuduva Ramesh 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Linz 2015
Performance of cone beam computed tomography in comparison to conventional imaging techniques for the detection of bone invasion in oral…
DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2014.07.023
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Linz 2015
Performance of cone beam computed tomography in comparison to conventional imaging techniques for the detection of bone invasion in oral…
PMID:25442744
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Nascimento 2018
Comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam CT in the assessment of juxta-apical radiolucency
DOI:10.1259/dmfr.20170198
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Nascimento 2018
Comparison of panoramic radiography and cone beam CT in the assessment of juxta-apical radiolucency.
PMID:28871830
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ramis-Alario 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shenoy 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shimizu 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Slieker 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Straub 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Takeshita 2014
Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital periapical radiography, panoramic radiography, and cone-beam computed…
DOI:10.4103/0976-237x.137930
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Takeshita 2014
Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital periapical radiography, panoramic radiography, and cone-beam computed…
PMID:25191066
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Waghmare 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPatients with OSCC undergoing preoperative imagingOSCC patients (sample sizes 14 to 197); some included studies on MRONJ, periapical lesions or in vitro bone loss
InterventionIndex tests: CBCT and/or conventional panoramic/periapical radiographyCBCT; CT; MRI; PET/CT; SPECT/CT; panoramic and periapical radiography
ComparisonHistopathology or intraoperative findings as reference standardHistopathology or surgical findings
OutcomesSensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy for bone invasionSensitivity, specificity, accuracy, summary AUC 0.59
Study designsComparative or observational studies (cross-sectional, case-control, cohort)Diagnostic accuracy studies (n=19)
TimingNot specifiedNot specified