Non-Cochrane · NMA · PM42332459

Effectiveness of manual therapy, exercise, low-level laser therapy, ultrasound, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in reducing pain and improving mouth opening in temporomandibular joint disorders: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Lin Long-Huei, Hsieh Guo-Jia, Lin Ting-Yu, et al. · Medicine · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000049263

Findings

Population Adults (18 years or older) with temporomandibular joint disorders

158 findings

TMJ manual therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: TMJ diagnostic subtype; TMJ disorder-mixed
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) -1.47 [-6.15, 3.20]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.3
SMD 1.30 [0.37, 2.23]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: Mean age; Mean age
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) 0.06 [-0.13, 0.25]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD -2.58 [-4.56, -0.60]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD 2.15 [0.64, 3.66]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: Treatment duration; Treatment duration
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) -0.80 [-2.97, 1.37]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: Treatment duration; Treatment duration
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) -0.33 [-276.67, 276.01]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: TMJ diagnostic subtype; TMJ disorder-mixed
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) 1.15 [-3.15, 5.45]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.3
SUCRA (%) 78.5
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SUCRA (%) 78.5
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SUCRA (%) 81.5
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.3
SUCRA (%) 80.3
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.5
SUCRA (%) 79.9
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.5
SUCRA (%) 79.6
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.5
SMD 1.49 [0.43, 2.54]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.3
SMD -1.60 [-2.78, -0.42]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.5
SMD -1.83 [-3.18, -0.47]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: Mean age; Mean age
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) 0.11 [-0.16, 0.39]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.3
SUCRA (%) 44.5
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SUCRA (%) 44.7
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.3
SMD -0.99 [-1.97, -0.02]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: indirect evidence only
SMD 1.19
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: Mean age; Mean age
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) -0.14 [-0.39, 0.10]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SUCRA (%) 45.8
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: Treatment duration; Treatment duration
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) 0.58 [-0.33, 1.49]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: direct evidence only
SMD 1.66
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: indirect evidence only
SMD -1.39
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.3
SUCRA (%) 42.2
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: TMJ diagnostic subtype; TMJ disorder-myogenous
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) 0.35 [-3.97, 4.67]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.5
SUCRA (%) 44.5
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.5
SUCRA (%) 42.8
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.5
SMD -1.15 [-2.26, -0.03]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: Treatment duration; Treatment duration
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) -1.71 [-278.05, 274.63]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD 1.39 [-0.06, 2.85]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: direct evidence only
SMD -2.01
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.3
SMD 0.83 [-0.07, 1.73]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: Mean age; Mean age
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) 0.26 [-0.10, 0.61]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.5
SMD 0.95 [-0.06, 1.97]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: TMJ diagnostic subtype; TMJ disorder-mixed
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) 2.16 [-2.43, 6.76]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: TMJ diagnostic subtype; TMJ disorder-myogenous
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) 2.71 [-0.99, 6.41]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD -1.69 [-3.32, -0.07]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: TMJ diagnostic subtype; TMJ disorder-mixed
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) -1.39 [-4.44, 1.66]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: TMJ diagnostic subtype; TMJ disorder-mixed
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) -1.55 [-5.02, 1.93]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD 1.65 [0.76, 2.54]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.5
SMD 1.18 [0.55, 1.80]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: TMJ diagnostic subtype; TMJ disorder- joint related
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) -1.88 [-5.48, 1.71]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: Mean age; Mean age
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) 0.04 [-0.11, 0.20]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.3
SMD 1.04 [0.49, 1.59]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.5
SUCRA (%) 61.0
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: indirect evidence only
SMD 2.16
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: Treatment duration; Treatment duration
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) 0.15 [-0.95, 1.26]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SUCRA (%) 58.8
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SUCRA (%) 59.5
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.3
SUCRA (%) 60.9
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: indirect evidence only
SMD -2.91
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: Treatment duration; Treatment duration
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) 0.51 [-0.21, 1.23]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: Mean age; Mean age
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) 0.13 [-0.08, 0.33]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: TMJ diagnostic subtype; TMJ disorder-joint related
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) 0.20 [-3.82, 4.22]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.5
SMD -1.44 [-2.20, -0.68]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: TMJ diagnostic subtype; TMJ disorder-myogenous
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) -3.35 [-6.72, 0.02]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: direct evidence only
SMD -1.67
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: direct evidence only
SMD 1.35
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.3
SUCRA (%) 61.4
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.5
SUCRA (%) 60.3
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.3
SMD -1.26 [-1.92, -0.60]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Low-level laser therapyControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD -2.04 [-3.16, -0.93]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.5
SMD 1.33 [0.46, 2.20]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SUCRA (%) 82.1
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: direct evidence only
SMD -2.74
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.3
SMD -1.64 [-2.62, -0.66]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.3
SMD 1.22 [0.45, 1.98]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: indirect evidence only
SMD 1.24
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: Mean age; Mean age
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) 0.10 [-0.62, 0.82]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: direct evidence only
SMD 2.62
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: TMJ diagnostic subtype; TMJ disorder-joint related
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) -2.60 [-6.71, 1.51]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.3
SUCRA (%) 75.5
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.5
SMD -1.90 [-3.02, -0.77]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: Treatment duration; Treatment duration
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) -0.10 [-1.54, 1.34]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.5
SUCRA (%) 82.0
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.3
SUCRA (%) 81.6
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: indirect evidence only
SMD -2.75
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SUCRA (%) 65.9
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: TMJ diagnostic subtype; TMJ disorder-joint related
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) 3.55 [-0.94, 8.04]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD -2.74 [-4.39, -1.08]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: Treatment duration; Treatment duration
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) -0.68 [-2.02, 0.67]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD 1.73 [0.47, 2.98]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: TMJ diagnostic subtype; TMJ disorder-myogenous
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) -2.42 [-6.93, 2.10]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: Mean age; Mean age
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) 0.62 [-0.57, 1.81]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundControl (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.5
SUCRA (%) 72.7
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: TMJ diagnostic subtype; TMJ disorder-joint related
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) 3.42 [-1.94, 8.78]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: Mean age; Mean age
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) 0.10 [-0.05, 0.25]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: Treatment duration; Treatment duration
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) 0.06 [-0.60, 0.71]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.3
SMD -0.78 [-1.63, 0.06]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: TMJ diagnostic subtype; TMJ disorder-mixed
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) -0.10 [-5.02, 4.82]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: TMJ diagnostic subtype; TMJ disorder-mixed
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) 0.82 [-2.86, 4.50]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.3
SUCRA (%) 31.3
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SUCRA (%) 33.5
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.5
SMD -0.93 [-1.90, 0.04]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.5
SUCRA (%) 43.2
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: Mean age; Mean age
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) -0.04 [-0.52, 0.43]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: indirect evidence only
SMD 0.99
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SUCRA (%) 47.7
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.5
SUCRA (%) 32.1
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.5
SMD 0.94 [0.33, 1.54]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: indirect evidence only
SMD 0.40
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD -1.39 [-2.82, 0.03]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.3
SMD 0.80 [0.27, 1.34]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: TMJ diagnostic subtype; TMJ disorder-myogenous
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) 2.32 [-1.25, 5.90]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: direct evidence only
SMD -2.74
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Sensitivity analysis: pre-post correlation coefficient 0.3
SUCRA (%) 41.6
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: TMJ diagnostic subtype; TMJ disorder-myogenous
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) -2.70 [-7.23, 1.82]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: direct evidence only
SMD 1.55
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD 1.41 [0.54, 2.28]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Control (no treatment, sham or education)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Meta-regression: Treatment duration; Treatment duration
Meta-regression coefficient (SMD) -0.22 [-1.27, 0.84]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Low-level laser therapyMaximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD -0.24 [-1.19, 0.72]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Low-level laser therapyPain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD 0.65 [-0.80, 2.10]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Low-level laser therapyMaximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: direct evidence only
SMD -0.39
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Low-level laser therapyPain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: indirect evidence only
SMD -0.15
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Low-level laser therapyMaximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: indirect evidence only
SMD 0.18
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Low-level laser therapyPain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: direct evidence only
SMD 1.20
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseLow-level laser therapyMaximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: direct evidence only
SMD 0.14
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseLow-level laser therapyPain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD 0.35 [-1.21, 1.91]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseLow-level laser therapyPain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: indirect evidence only
SMD 0.62
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseLow-level laser therapyMaximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: indirect evidence only
SMD -0.53
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseLow-level laser therapyPain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: direct evidence only
SMD 0.06
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseLow-level laser therapyMaximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD -0.25 [-1.63, 1.13]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyLow-level laser therapyPain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: indirect evidence only
SMD -2.00
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyLow-level laser therapyMaximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: indirect evidence only
SMD 1.71
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyLow-level laser therapyMaximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD 0.50 [-0.85, 1.86]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyLow-level laser therapyPain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: direct evidence only
SMD 0.27
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyLow-level laser therapyMaximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: direct evidence only
SMD 0.14
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyLow-level laser therapyPain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD -0.54 [-2.35, 1.28]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundLow-level laser therapyMaximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: indirect evidence only
SMD 1.17
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundLow-level laser therapyPain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: indirect evidence only
SMD -1.89
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundLow-level laser therapyPain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD -0.69 [-2.34, 0.95]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundLow-level laser therapyPain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: direct evidence only
SMD 0.41
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundLow-level laser therapyMaximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD 0.08 [-1.18, 1.34]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundLow-level laser therapyMaximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: direct evidence only
SMD -0.52
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD -0.02 [-1.59, 1.56]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ exerciseTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD -0.30 [-2.30, 1.70]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD -1.19 [-3.44, 1.06]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD 0.74 [-0.85, 2.33]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD -1.34 [-2.81, 0.12]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: direct evidence only
SMD -1.79
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD 0.32 [-0.94, 1.58]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: direct evidence only
SMD 0.18
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Pain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: indirect evidence only
SMD 0.61
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)Maximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: indirect evidence only
SMD 0.56
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyTMJ exercisePain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: indirect evidence only
SMD 0.32
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyTMJ exerciseMaximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD 0.76 [-0.44, 1.96]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyTMJ exercisePain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: direct evidence only
SMD -1.20
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyTMJ exerciseMaximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: indirect evidence only
SMD 0.33
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyTMJ exerciseMaximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders · Side-splitting: direct evidence only
SMD 0.84
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
TMJ manual therapyTMJ exercisePain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD -0.89 [-2.54, 0.77]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundTMJ exerciseMaximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD 0.34 [-1.45, 2.12]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundTMJ exercisePain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD -1.04 [-3.20, 1.11]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundTMJ manual therapyMaximal mouth opening (MMO)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD -0.42 [-2.22, 1.38]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Therapeutic ultrasoundTMJ manual therapyPain intensity (VAS or NRS)
End of intervention (1 to 8 weeks) · Frequentist network meta-analysis of RCTs; adults with TMJ disorders
SMD -0.16 [-2.54, 2.23]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported

Included primary studies 23

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Monteiro 2020
Effectiveness of Photobiomodulation in Temporomandibular Disorder-Related Pain Using a 635 nm Diode Laser: A Randomized, Blinded, and…
PMID:32427553
20204 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Barbosa 2019
Effects of 8 weeks of masticatory muscles focused endurance exercises on women with oro-facial pain and temporomandibular disorders: A…
PMID:31099036
20193 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Emshoff 2008
Low-level laser therapy for treatment of temporomandibular joint pain: a double-blind and placebo-controlled trial.
PMID:18329580
20082 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Ramesh 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NR2 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Brochado 2018
Comparative effectiveness of photobiomodulation and manual therapy alone or combined in TMD patients: a randomized clinical trial.
PMID:29995062
20181 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
da Cunha 2008
Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the treatment of temporomandibular disorder.
PMID:18783114
20081 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
De Abreu Venancio 2005
Low intensity laser therapy in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders: a double-blind study.
PMID:16202043
20051 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Kalamir 2013
Intra-oral myofascial therapy versus education and self-care in the treatment of chronic, myogenous temporomandibular disorder: a…
PMID:23738586
20131 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Patil 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Sancakli 2015
Early results of low-level laser application for masticatory muscle pain: a double-blind randomized clinical study.
PMID:26496720
20151 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Tanhan 2023
Efficacy of different combinations of physiotherapy techniques compared to exercise and patient education in temporomandibular disorders:…
PMID:33818314
20231 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Arabion 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ba 2021
Ultrasound is Effective to Treat Temporomandibular Joint Disorder.
PMID:34140803
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bae 2013
The Effect of Relaxation Exercises for the Masticator Muscles on Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction (TMD).
PMID:24259807
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bijjaragi 2015
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bijjaragi 2015
Electrocardiographic predictors of atrial fibrillation: methodological considerations.
PMID:20152208
2010this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Budakoti 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gavish 2006
Effect of controlled masticatory exercise on pain and muscle performance in myofascial pain patients: A pilot study.
PMID:16933459
2006this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kirupa 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sarfraz 2023
Comparison of effects of manual physical therapy and exercise therapy for patients with Temporomandibular disorders.
PMID:36842021
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Seifi 2017
Comparative effectiveness of Low Level Laser therapy and Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation on Temporomandibular Joint Disorders.
PMID:29071032
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yeladandi 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yeladandi 2024
PMID:20241816
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdults (18 years or older) diagnosed with TMJ disorders by imaging or RDC/TMD Axis IAdults with TMJ disorders, myogenous, joint-related, mixed or not described (n=952)
InterventionTMJ manual therapy, TMJ exercise, low-level laser therapy, therapeutic ultrasound, TENS (single treatments)TMJ manual therapy, TMJ exercise, low-level laser therapy, therapeutic ultrasound, TENS (n=22 RCTs)
ComparisonNo intervention or sham therapyControl: no treatment, sham or education; head-to-head comparisons between active treatments
OutcomesPain intensity (NRS or VAS); maximal mouth openingPain intensity (n=20 RCTs); maximal mouth opening (n=15 RCTs)
Study designsRandomized controlled trialsRCTs: 14 two-arm and 8 multi-arm
TimingNot specifiedEnd of intervention, 1 to 8 weeks