Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42782986

Photobiomodulation in Dental Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Mateus Olívia Tosta de Macedo Vianna, Czermainski Fernanda Rasch, Mateus Tiago Henrique de Abreu, et al. · Dentistry journal · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.3390/dj14090599

Findings

Population Adults undergoing dental implant placement

42 findings

Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationImplant stability (ISQ)
3 weeks · Follow-up time
MD 1.95 [-0.31, 4.21]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationPeri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU)
all time points
MD 86.02 [-28.48, 200.52]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
3 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationPeri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU)
12 weeks · Follow-up time
MD 184.87 [-276.48, 646.22]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationMarginal bone loss (mm)
12 weeks · Follow-up time
MD -0.16 [-0.26, -0.06]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationImplant stability (ISQ)
6 weeks · Follow-up time
MD 2.95 [-0.15, 6.06]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationPeri-implant bone density (2D radiography, grayscale)
12 weeks · Follow-up time
MD 15.7 [-3.4, 34.8]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 11 participants
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationImplant stability (Periotest)
4 weeks · Follow-up time
MD -0.92 [-1.49, -0.34]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulationSham or no photobiomodulationImplant stability (ISQ): association of energy dose with effect
12 weeks · Meta-regression by energy dose
meta-regression coefficient -0.076 [-0.295, 0.143]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationImplant stability (Periotest)
8 weeks · Follow-up time
MD -0.67 [-1.45, 0.11]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationPostoperative pain (VAS/NRS)
baseline · Follow-up time
MD -0.14 [-0.54, 0.26]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationPeri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU)
6 weeks · Follow-up time
MD -20.17 [-41.48, 1.13]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 20 participants
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationImplant stability (Periotest)
baseline · Follow-up time
MD -0.16 [-0.64, 0.32]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationImplant stability (ISQ)
2 weeks · Follow-up time
MD 1.85 [-0.68, 4.38]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationPeri-implant bone density (2D radiography, grayscale)
4 weeks · Follow-up time
MD 5.3 [-8.12, 18.72]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 11 participants
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationPostoperative pain (VAS/NRS)
5 days · Follow-up time
MD -0.29 [-0.38, -0.2]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationPostoperative pain (VAS/NRS)
3 days · Follow-up time
MD -0.25 [-0.56, 0.05]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationMarginal bone loss (mm)
all time points
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
MD -0.09 [-0.16, -0.01]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
6 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationImplant stability (Periotest)
all time points
MD -0.55 [-0.84, -0.27]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
5 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationImplant stability (ISQ)
baseline · Follow-up time
MD 0.02 [-0.96, 1]
GRADE not reported
12 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationMarginal bone loss (mm)
6 months · Follow-up time
MD -0.04 [-0.57, 0.49]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationPostoperative pain (VAS/NRS)
all time points
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
MD -0.27 [-0.35, -0.19]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
6 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationImplant stability (ISQ)
9 weeks · Follow-up time
MD 1.56 [-4.49, 7.62]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationPeri-implant bone density (2D radiography, grayscale)
6 weeks · Follow-up time
MD 7.47 [-7.34, 22.28]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 18 participants
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationPeri-implant bone density (2D radiography, grayscale)
baseline · Follow-up time
MD -0.38 [-6.62, 5.85]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationPostoperative pain (VAS/NRS)
2 days · Follow-up time
MD -0.31 [-1.2, 0.57]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationPostoperative pain (VAS/NRS)
7 days · Follow-up time
MD -0.1 [-0.37, 0.16]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationMarginal bone loss (mm)
baseline · Follow-up time
MD 0 [-0.06, 0.05]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationImplant stability (ISQ)
all time points
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
MD 1.26 [0.61, 1.91]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
13 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationMarginal bone loss (mm)
12 months · Follow-up time
MD -0.11 [-0.25, 0.03]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationImplant stability (Periotest)
6 months · Follow-up time
MD -0.59 [-1.71, 0.54]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationPeri-implant bone density (2D radiography, grayscale)
6 months · Follow-up time
MD 24.19 [0.89, 47.48]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationImplant stability (ISQ)
6 months · Follow-up time
MD 1.65 [-0.53, 3.83]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationImplant stability (Periotest)
2 weeks · Follow-up time
MD -0.04 [-1.71, 1.62]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationImplant stability (Periotest)
12 weeks · Follow-up time
MD -1.71 [-2.75, -0.67]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationPostoperative pain (VAS/NRS)
1 day · Follow-up time
MD -0.35 [-0.66, -0.03]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationImplant stability (ISQ)
7 days · Follow-up time
MD 1.43 [-1, 3.86]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationImplant stability (ISQ)
10 days · Follow-up time
MD 2.27 [0.4, 4.13]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationImplant stability (ISQ)
4 weeks · Follow-up time
MD 1.51 [-0.99, 4.02]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationPeri-implant bone density (2D radiography, grayscale)
all time points
MD 9.82 [1.08, 18.56]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
2 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationPeri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU)
baseline · Follow-up time
MD 114.07 [22.78, 205.36]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationImplant stability (ISQ)
12 weeks · Follow-up time
MD 0.89 [-0.78, 2.55]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED)Sham or no photobiomodulationPeri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU)
4 weeks · Follow-up time
MD -61.39 [-82.81, -39.97]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 38 participants

Included primary studies 63

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Attia 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Alashhab 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Arakeeb 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Arakeeb 2019
Effect of Combined Application of Growth Factors and Diode Laser Bio-Stimulation on the Osseo Integration of Dental Implants.
PMID:31666858
2019this review onlyPeri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU)not extracted yet
Attia 2023
The Influence of Low-Level Laser Therapy on CBCT Radiographic and Biochemical Profiles of Type II Controlled Diabetic Patients After…
PMID:37102010
2023this review onlyPeri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU)not extracted yet
Bakry 2020
EVALUATION OF CRESTAL BONE CHANGES AROUND DELAYED IMPLANT IN RESPONSE TO DIODE LASER THEARAPY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL.
DOI:10.21608/edj.2020.24407.1039
2020this review onlyMarginal bone loss (mm)not extracted yet
Bakry 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Basualdo Allende 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Basualdo Allende 2024
Effectiveness of Low-Level Laser Therapy in reducing postoperative pain after dental implant surgery: A randomized clinical trial.
PMID:39098624
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bilge 2022
Efficacy of diode laser therapy on osseointegration of dental implants: A split-mouth clinical study
DOI:10.4328/acam.20900
2022this review onlyImplant stability (Periotest)not extracted yet
Bilge 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bozkaya 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bozkaya 2021
The stability of implants and microbiological effects following photobiomodulation therapy with one-stage placement: A randomized,…
PMID:33851765
2021this review onlyImplant stability (ISQ)not extracted yet
Caccianiga 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Caccianiga 2020
Evaluation of effectiveness of photobiostimulation in alleviating side effects after dental implant surgery. A randomized clinical trial.
PMID:31967979
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Camolesi 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Camolesi 2023
Photobiomodulation in dental implant stability and post-surgical healing and inflammation. A randomised double-blind study.
PMID:36541106
2023this review onlyImplant stability (ISQ)not extracted yet
Collado-Murcia 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Collado-Murcia 2024
Efficacy of Photobiomodulation in the Management of Pain and Inflammation after Dental Implants: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
PMID:39407769
2024this review onlyPostoperative pain (VAS/NRS)not extracted yet
Deljavan 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Deljavan 2024
Effect of postoperative 660-nm low-level laser therapy on the radiographic crestal bone loss of fresh-socket dental implants.
PMID:39386130
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
El Makaky 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
El Makaky 2020
A National Consensus Survey for Current Practice in Brain Tumor Management III: Brain Metastasis and Primary Central Nervous System…
PMID:32390350
2020this review onlyImplant stability (Periotest); Marginal bone loss (mm); Postoperative pain (VAS/NRS)not extracted yet
Elsyad 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Elsyad 2019
Effect of Low-Level Laser Irradiation on Stability and Marginal Bone of Narrow Implants Retaining Overdentures in Moderately Controlled…
PMID:31389750
2019this review onlyImplant stability (Periotest); Marginal bone loss (mm)not extracted yet
Fahim 2022
Effect of Low-Level Diode Laser Bio-Stimulation on Implant Stability Before, During and After Immediate Implants in Mandibular Molars. (A…
DOI:10.54623/fdj.8023
2022this review onlyImplant stability (ISQ)not extracted yet
Fahim 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
García-Morales 2012
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
García-Morales 2012
Stability of dental implants after irradiation with an 830-nm low-level laser: a double-blind randomized clinical study.
PMID:21732113
2012this review onlyImplant stability (ISQ)not extracted yet
Gokmenoglu 2014
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gokmenoglu 2014
The effect of light-emitting diode photobiomodulation on implant stability and biochemical markers in peri-implant crevicular fluid.
PMID:24552468
2014this review onlyImplant stability (ISQ)not extracted yet
Gulati 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gulati 2020
Effect of low level laser therapy on crestal bone levels around dental implants-A pilot study.
PMID:33063461
2020this review onlyMarginal bone loss (mm)not extracted yet
Hamed 2013
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPeri-implant bone density (2D radiography, grayscale)not extracted yet
Karaca 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Karaca 2018
Is Low-level laser therapy and gaseous ozone application effective on osseointegration of immediately loaded implants?
PMID:29888715
2018this review onlyImplant stability (ISQ); Postoperative pain (VAS/NRS)not extracted yet
Kinalski 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kinalski 2021
Influence of low-level laser therapy on implant stability in implants placed in healed sites: a randomized controlled trial.
PMID:34059974
2021this review onlyImplant stability (ISQ); Marginal bone loss (mm)not extracted yet
Lobato 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lobato 2020
Influence of low-level laser therapy on implant stability in implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: A randomized clinical trial.
PMID:32329198
2020this review onlyImplant stability (ISQ); Marginal bone loss (mm)not extracted yet
Makker 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Makker 2024
Evaluation of effect of low-level laser therapy on alleviation of pain in patients with implant-supported mandibular overdenture: A pilot…
PMID:40227938
2024this review onlyPostoperative pain (VAS/NRS)not extracted yet
Mandic 2015
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mandic 2015
Influence of postoperative low-level laser therapy on the osseointegration of self-tapping implants in the posterior maxilla: a 6-week…
PMID:25958474
2015this review onlyImplant stability (ISQ)not extracted yet
Matys 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Matys 2019
Photobiomodulation by a 635nm Diode Laser on Peri-Implant Bone: Primary and Secondary Stability and Bone Density Analysis-A Randomized…
PMID:31143771
2019this review onlyImplant stability (Periotest); Peri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU)not extracted yet
Memarian 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Memarian 2018
The effect of low-level laser 810 nm and light-emitting diode photobiomodulation (626 nm) on the stability of the implant and inflammatory…
PMID:30123306
2018this review onlyImplant stability (Periotest)not extracted yet
Mikhail 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mikhail 2018
Effect of Laser Therapy on the Osseointegration of Immediately Loaded Dental Implants in Patients under Vitamin C, Omega-3 and Calcium…
PMID:30159079
2018this review onlyPeri-implant bone density (2D radiography, grayscale)not extracted yet
Mohajerani 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mohajerani 2020
Can Low-Level Laser and Light-Emitting Diode Enhance the Stability of Dental Implants?
PMID:32346244
2020this review onlyImplant stability (ISQ)not extracted yet
Momeni 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Momeni 2024
Effect of Low-Level Laser Therapy on the Osseointegration of Immediately Loaded Implants with a Connective Tissue Graft: A Randomized…
PMID:39050993
2024this review onlyImplant stability (ISQ)not extracted yet
Palled 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Palled 2021
Assessment of the Healing of Dental Implant Surgical Site Following Low-Level Laser Therapy Using Bioclinical Parameters: An Exploratory…
PMID:32662840
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Reza 2021
Efficacy of photo bio-modulation therapy for pain relief and soft tissue wound healing after dental implant surgery: A double-blind…
DOI:10.1016/j.jpap.2021.100062
2021this review onlyPostoperative pain (VAS/NRS)not extracted yet
Reza 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sahtout 2021
A Clinical Study of the Effect of Low-Level Laser Treatment on the Clinical Stability of Immediately Loaded Implants in Posterior Maxilla
DOI:10.19070/2377-8075-21000374
2021this review onlyImplant stability (ISQ)not extracted yet
Sahtout 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Torkzaban 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Torkzaban 2018
Low-level laser therapy with 940 nm diode laser on stability of dental implants: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
PMID:29082462
2018this review onlyImplant stability (ISQ)not extracted yet
Zou 2024
Low-level laser therapy on soft tissue healing after implantation: a randomized controlled trial.
PMID:39639276
2024this review onlyPostoperative pain (VAS/NRS)not extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdults (>=18 years) undergoing dental implant placement in healed or immediate sites; controlled systemic conditions eligible; pediatric patients and cases with extensive bone grafting or sinus lifts excluded829 patients and 1278 implants; generally healthy adults (mean ages mid-20s to mid-60s), some with controlled type 2 diabetes; maxillary and mandibular sites (n=32)
InterventionPBM via low-level laser or LED applied preoperatively, intraoperatively and/or postoperatively; any wavelength, dosimetry or protocolLow-level lasers or LEDs, 630-980 nm, 20-200 mW, about 0.5-8 J per point; single intraoperative to multiple sessions up to 14 days (n=32)
ComparisonSham/placebo irradiation; no PBM (standard care)Sham/placebo irradiation or no PBM (n=32)
OutcomesPrimary: implant stability (ISQ or Periotest), peri-implant bone density, marginal bone loss, postoperative pain (VAS or NRS). Secondary: peri-implant inflammation, soft tissue healing, postoperative complicationsISQ (n=13); Periotest (n=5); bone density 3D CBCT HU (n=3); bone density 2D radiographic grayscale (n=2); marginal bone loss (n=6); postoperative pain VAS (n=6); 30 of 32 trials in meta-analyses
Study designsRCTs (parallel or split-mouth); English-language peer-reviewed articlesRCTs: parallel-group (n=20), split-mouth (n=12)
TimingAll reported follow-up time pointsImmediate postoperative to 12 months (ISQ and Periotest to 6 months; bone density to 6 months; MBL to 12 months; pain to 7 days)

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoYesno
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalNoYesno
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailYesYesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: No · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Nono
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoYesno
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalYesYesyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes