Primary study · included by 1 review
EVALUATION OF CRESTAL BONE CHANGES AROUND DELAYED IMPLANT IN RESPONSE TO DIODE LASER THEARAPY: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL.
Bakry 2020 · Bakry Saleh, Kamel Heba · Egyptian Dental Journal · 2020
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Marginal bone loss (mm) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · all time points | MD -0.09 [-0.16, -0.01] | 6 studies | Low |
Marginal bone loss (mm) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · 6 months | MD -0.04 [-0.57, 0.49] | 4 studies | GRADE not reported |
Marginal bone loss (mm) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · 12 weeks | MD -0.16 [-0.26, -0.06] | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
Marginal bone loss (mm) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · baseline | MD 0 [-0.06, 0.05] | 4 studies | GRADE not reported |
Marginal bone loss (mm) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · 12 months | MD -0.11 [-0.25, 0.03] | 3 studies | GRADE not reported |
1 including review in total.