Primary study · included by 1 review

Effect of Combined Application of Growth Factors and Diode Laser Bio-Stimulation on the Osseo Integration of Dental Implants.

Arakeeb 2019 · Arakeeb Mohamed Ali Ali, Zaky Ahmed Abbas, Harhash Tarek Abdel-Hamid, et al. · Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2019

Included by

Photobiomodulation in Dental Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Arakeeb 2019 · Reference 40; Figure 4a

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Peri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · all time points	MD 86.02 [-28.48, 200.52]	3 studies	Very low
Peri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · 12 weeks	MD 184.87 [-276.48, 646.22]	2 studies	GRADE not reported
Peri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · 6 weeks	MD -20.17 [-41.48, 1.13]	1 study · 20 participants	GRADE not reported
Peri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · baseline	MD 114.07 [22.78, 205.36]	2 studies	GRADE not reported
Peri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · 4 weeks	MD -61.39 [-82.81, -39.97]	1 study · 38 participants	GRADE not reported

1 including review in total.