Primary study · included by 1 review

The Influence of Low-Level Laser Therapy on CBCT Radiographic and Biochemical Profiles of Type II Controlled Diabetic Patients After Dental Implant Insertion: A Randomized Case-Control Study.

Attia 2023 · Attia Mai S, Elewa Gasser M, Abdelgawad Nora, et al. · Cureus · 2023

Included by

Photobiomodulation in Dental Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Attia 2023 · Reference 41; Figure 4a

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Peri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · all time points	MD 86.02 [-28.48, 200.52]	3 studies	Very low
Peri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · 12 weeks	MD 184.87 [-276.48, 646.22]	2 studies	GRADE not reported
Peri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · 6 weeks	MD -20.17 [-41.48, 1.13]	1 study · 20 participants	GRADE not reported
Peri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · baseline	MD 114.07 [22.78, 205.36]	2 studies	GRADE not reported
Peri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · 4 weeks	MD -61.39 [-82.81, -39.97]	1 study · 38 participants	GRADE not reported

1 including review in total.