Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42116126

Marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM restorations with CAD-defined cement space: a meta-analysis of micro-CT studies.

Yılmaz Bahar Kavafoğlu, Hocagil Tuğba Akkaya, Tamam Evşen · BMC oral health · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1186/s12903-026-08541-x

Findings

Population Fixed CAD/CAM restorations (crowns, partial crowns, bridges) on tooth, typodont or die supports

10 findings

CAD/CAM restorations with a numerically predefined cement space set at the CAD design stageNone (single-group pooled mean)Internal fit measured by micro-CT (um)
Not specified · Laboratory (in vitro)
Pooled mean (um) 138.57 [122.56, 154.58]
GRADE not reported
37 studies
CAD/CAM restorations with a numerically predefined cement space set at the CAD design stageNone (single-group pooled mean)Marginal fit measured by micro-CT (um)
Not specified · Laboratory (in vitro)
Pooled mean (um) 105.66 [91.55, 119.78]
GRADE not reported
41 studies
CAD/CAM restorations with a numerically predefined cement space set at the CAD design stageNone (single-group pooled mean); subgroup contrast of reported fit values across studiesInternal fit measured by micro-CT (um)
Not specified · Laboratory (in vitro) · Cemented samples
Pooled mean (um) 181.87 [145.65, 218.09]
GRADE not reported
5 studies
CAD/CAM restorations with a numerically predefined cement space set at the CAD design stageNone (single-group pooled mean); subgroup contrast of reported fit values across studiesMarginal fit measured by micro-CT (um)
Not specified · Laboratory (in vitro) · Cemented samples
Pooled mean (um) 137.67 [78.0, 197.33]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
CAD/CAM restorations with a numerically predefined cement space set at the CAD design stageNone (single-group pooled mean); subgroup contrast of reported fit values across studiesInternal fit measured by micro-CT (um)
Not specified · Laboratory (in vitro) · Non-cemented samples
Pooled mean (um) 131.67 [115.21, 148.12]
GRADE not reported
32 studies
CAD/CAM restorations with a numerically predefined cement space set at the CAD design stageNone (single-group pooled mean); subgroup contrast of reported fit values across studiesMarginal fit measured by micro-CT (um)
Not specified · Laboratory (in vitro) · Non-cemented samples
Pooled mean (um) 103.19 [88.44, 117.93]
GRADE not reported
35 studies
CAD/CAM restorations with a numerically predefined cement space set at the CAD design stageNone (single-group pooled mean); subgroup contrast of reported fit values across studiesMarginal fit measured by micro-CT (um)
Not specified · Laboratory (in vitro) · Extraoral scanner (EOS)
Pooled mean (um) 102.79 [77.46, 128.12]
GRADE not reported
20 studies
CAD/CAM restorations with a numerically predefined cement space set at the CAD design stageNone (single-group pooled mean); subgroup contrast of reported fit values across studiesInternal fit measured by micro-CT (um)
Not specified · Laboratory (in vitro) · Extraoral scanner (EOS)
Pooled mean (um) 132.04 [112.01, 152.07]
GRADE not reported
20 studies
CAD/CAM restorations with a numerically predefined cement space set at the CAD design stageNone (single-group pooled mean); subgroup contrast of reported fit values across studiesInternal fit measured by micro-CT (um)
Not specified · Laboratory (in vitro) · Intraoral scanner (IOS)
Pooled mean (um) 148.02 [121.56, 174.48]
GRADE not reported
15 studies
CAD/CAM restorations with a numerically predefined cement space set at the CAD design stageNone (single-group pooled mean); subgroup contrast of reported fit values across studiesMarginal fit measured by micro-CT (um)
Not specified · Laboratory (in vitro) · Intraoral scanner (IOS)
Pooled mean (um) 109.83 [95.59, 124.06]
GRADE not reported
17 studies

Included primary studies 79

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Attia 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Bandiaky 2023
Marginal and internal fit of five-unit zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses fabricated with digital scans and conventional impressions:…
PMID:36627825
20231 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Ekici 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Park 2019
Effects of Printing Parameters on the Fit of Implant-Supported 3D Printing Resin Prosthetics.
PMID:31395801
20191 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Abduljawad 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Abduljawad 2022
Marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate endocrowns fabricated using conventional, digital, and combination techniques.
PMID:35294099
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Akat 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Akat 2022
Does cad software affect the marginal and internal fit of milled full ceramic crowns?
PMID:35293507
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Alajaji 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Alajaji 2017
Micro-CT Evaluation of Ceramic Inlays: Comparison of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Five and Three Axis CAM Systems with a Heat Press…
PMID:27680508
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Aldahian 2021
Influence of Conventional, CAD-CAM, and 3D Printing Fabrication Techniques on the Marginal Integrity and Surface Roughness and Wear of…
DOI:10.3390/app11198964
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Aldahian 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Alharbi 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Alharbi 2018
Three-dimensional evaluation of marginal and internal fit of 3D-printed interim restorations fabricated on different finish line designs.
PMID:29032176
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
ArRejaie 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
ArRejaie 2018
Internal Fit and Marginal Gap Evaluation of Zirconia Copings Using Microcomputed Tomography: An In Vitro Analysis.
PMID:29077775
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Atlas 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Atlas 2024
Comparison of loupes versus microscope-enhanced CAD-CAM crown preparations: A microcomputed tomography analysis of marginal gaps.
PMID:35643825
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Attia 2023
Micro-CT analysis of marginal and internal fit of milled and pressed polyetheretherketone single crowns.
PMID:37072286
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bandiaky 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bayrak 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bayrak 2021
Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis of Fit of Ceramic Inlays Produced with Different CAD Software Programs.
PMID:33393742
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Borba 2013
Evaluation of the adaptation of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures using micro-CT technology.
PMID:24036977
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Cunali 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Cunali 2017
Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Zirconia Crowns: A Comparative Study of Assessment Methods.
PMID:29160399
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Daou 2024
Does the choice of the measuring technique affect the comparison of fit between zirconia and cobalt-chromium prostheses?
PMID:38650346
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Dauti 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Dauti 2018
Micro-CT evaluation of marginal and internal fit of cemented polymer infiltrated ceramic network material crowns manufactured after…
PMID:29891419
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Dauti 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Dauti 2020
Influence of two different cement space settings and three different cement types on the fit of polymer-infiltrated ceramic network…
PMID:31515700
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ekici 2021
Micro-CT Evaluation of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Crown and Inlay Restorations Fabricated Via Different Digital Scanners belonging…
PMID:33751000
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Elbadawy 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Elbadawy 2021
Effect of various digital cement space settings on the adaptation of CAD/CAM occlusal veneer "micro-ct evaluation".
PMID:33390385
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Elbadawy 2022
MicroCT evaluation for CAD/CAM occlusal veneer fit using two materials and three cement space settings.
PMID:36043571
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ferrairo 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ferrairo 2021
Comparison of marginal adaptation and internal fit of monolithic lithium disilicate crowns produced by 4 different CAD/CAM systems.
PMID:32783095
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Freitas 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Freitas 2020
Adaptation accuracy of milled lithium disilicate crowns: A 2D and 3D microCT analysis.
PMID:32091666
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hassouneh 2023
A Micro-computed Tomography Analysis of Marginal and Internal Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Three CAD/CAM Materials.
PMID:36445975
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jalalian 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jalalian 2023
Assessment of Marginal and Internal Adaptation in Provisional Crowns Utilizing Three Distinct Materials.
PMID:38238272
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kim 2016
Fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated from conventional and digital impressions assessed with micro-CT.
PMID:27422237
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
L36445975Hassouneh 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Nagi 2023
Comparative evaluation of internal fit and marginal gap of endocrowns using lithium disilicate and polyether ether ketone materials - an…
PMID:37029396
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Oğuz 2021
Marginal and internal fit of feldspathic ceramic CAD/CAM crowns fabricated via different extraoral digitization methods: a micro-computed…
PMID:33104952
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Peng 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Peng 2020
Assessment of the Adaptation of Interim Crowns using Different Measurement Techniques.
PMID:31702087
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Pereira 2024
Evaluation of Marginal Fit of CAD/CAM Ceramic Crowns and Scanning Time Using Different Intraoral Scanning Systems.
PMID:39728159
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
PMC6145157Saab 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
PMC6617221Son 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
PMC9645188Elbadawy 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
PMC9733092Zheng 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
PMC10082505Nagi 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
PMC11129817Daou 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
PMC11677190Pereira 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
PMC672049731395801Park 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
PMC1009672837050329Toma 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Prudenta 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Prudenta 2018
Influence of scanner, powder application, and adjustments on CAD-CAM crown misfit.
PMID:28689912
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rezende 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rezende 2017
Dimensional changes from the sintering process and fit of Y-TZP copings: Micro-CT analysis.
PMID:28939084
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rizonaki 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rizonaki 2022
Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM crowns with different finish lines by using a micro-CT technique.
PMID:33541816
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
S1806-8324201300050000324036977Borba 2013
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Saab 2018
Micro-CT Analysis of Y-TZP Copings Made by Different CAD/CAM Systems: Marginal and Internal Fit.
PMID:30254675
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Silveira 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Silveira 2017
Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated composite resin and ceramic crowns scanned by 2 intraoral cameras.
PMID:27677214
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Son 2019
A Comparison Study of Marginal and Internal Fit Assessment Methods for Fixed Dental Prostheses.
PMID:31159460
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tabata 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tabata 2020
Marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM composite resin and ceramic crowns before and after internal adjustment.
PMID:31307805
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tamam 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tamam 2023
Effect of different preparation finishing procedures on the marginal and internal fit of CAD-CAM-produced restorations: A microcomputed…
PMID:34974905
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Toma 2023
Micro-CT Marginal and Internal Fit Evaluation of CAD/CAM High-Performance Polymer Onlay Restorations.
PMID:37050329
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Topkara 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Topkara 2022
Examining the adaptation of modified endocrowns prepared with CAD-CAM in maxillary and mandibular molars: A microcomputed tomography study.
PMID:33454117
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Vág 2020
Marginal and internal fit of full ceramic crowns milled using CADCAM systems on cadaver full arch scans.
PMID:32631333
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yildirim 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yildirim 2017
Evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of hybrid and nanoceramic systems with microcomputed tomography: An in vitro study.
PMID:28089331
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zheng 2022
Effect of virtual cement space and restorative materials on the adaptation of CAD-CAM endocrowns.
PMID:36494663
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationFixed prosthetic restorations produced with CAD/CAMCAD/CAM fixed restorations: full crowns (n=26), partial crowns (n=9), bridges (n=4)
InterventionStudies in which the cement gap is determined at the design stage and given numericallyPredefined cement space (mean 67.8 um, range 0 to 120 um) with micro-CT (n=41)
ComparisonReported marginal and internal fit values compared across experimental conditions (scanner type, cementation status)Cemented (n=6 marginal, 5 internal) vs non-cemented; EOS (n=20) vs IOS (n=17 marginal, 15 internal)
OutcomesMarginal and internal fitMarginal fit (41 datasets) and internal fit (37 datasets)
Study designsIn vitro studies using only micro-CT for fit analysisIn vitro studies (n=41)
TimingStudies published 2013 to 2024Not specified

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalNoNoyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesNono
5Study selection in duplicateYesNono
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailYesPartial Yesno
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Partial Yes · NRSI: Partial YesNRSI: Partial Yes · RCT: N/Ano
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: Partial YesNRSI: Yes · RCT: N/Ano
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalNoYesno
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes