Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM41832465

The effect of build orientation on the marginal and internal fit of 3-D printed provisional fixed dental prosthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Altoman Majed S · BMC oral health · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1186/s12903-026-08094-z

Findings

6 findings

Population
Single 3D-printed provisional resin crownsPrinting at 45 degree build orientationPrinting at 0 degree build orientationMarginal fit (marginal discrepancy, um)
Not applicable · In vitro (laboratory specimens); heterogeneity I2 = 86% (p = 0.0009)
MD -14.02 [-14.58, -13.45]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias
2 studies · 210 participants
Single 3D-printed provisional resin crownsPrinting at 90 degree build orientationPrinting at 0 degree build orientationMarginal fit (marginal discrepancy, um)
Not applicable · In vitro (laboratory specimens); heterogeneity I2 = 91% (p < 0.00001)
MD -31.97 [-32.57, -31.38]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias
2 studies · 210 participants
Three-unit 3D-printed provisional resin fixed dental prosthesesPrinting at 90 degree build orientationPrinting at 0 degree build orientationMarginal fit (marginal discrepancy, um)
Not applicable · In vitro (laboratory specimens); heterogeneity I2 = 98% (p < 0.00001)
MD -15.52 [-17.5, -13.55]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias
2 studies · 168 participants
Three-unit 3D-printed provisional resin fixed dental prosthesesPrinting at 90 degree build orientationPrinting at 0 degree build orientationInternal fit (internal discrepancy, um)
Not applicable · In vitro (laboratory specimens); heterogeneity I2 = 86% (p = 0.0008)
MD 3.76 [2.46, 5.06]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias
2 studies · 168 participants
Three-unit 3D-printed provisional resin fixed dental prosthesesPrinting at 270 degree build orientationPrinting at 0 degree build orientationInternal fit (internal discrepancy, um)
Not applicable · In vitro (laboratory specimens); heterogeneity I2 = 98% (p < 0.00001)
MD -9.08 [-12.75, -5.41]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias
1 study · 280 participants
Three-unit 3D-printed provisional resin fixed dental prosthesesPrinting at 270 degree build orientationPrinting at 0 degree build orientationMarginal fit (marginal discrepancy, um)
Not applicable · In vitro (laboratory specimens); heterogeneity I2 = 99% (p < 0.00001)
MD -8.64 [-11.92, -5.37]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias
1 study · 120 participants

Included primary studies 10

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Park 2019
Effects of Printing Parameters on the Fit of Implant-Supported 3D Printing Resin Prosthetics.
PMID:31395801
20191 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Al-Dulaijan 2024
Internal and marginal fits of 3D-printed provisional prostheses: comparative effect of different printing parameters.
PMID:39726768
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Donmez 2025
Influence of printing parameters on the fabrication and fit accuracy of additively manufactured resin-based definitive three-unit fixed…
PMID:40578787
2025this review onlyMarginal fit (marginal discrepancy, um); Internal fit (internal discrepancy, um)not extracted yet
Farag 2024
Build angle effect on 3D-printed dental crowns marginal fit using digital light-processing and stereo-lithography technology: an in vitro…
PMID:38212816
2024this review onlyMarginal fit (marginal discrepancy, um)not extracted yet
Jang 2024
Fit analysis of stereolithography-manufactured three-unit resin prosthesis with different 3D-printing build orientations and layer…
PMID:36653209
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Khanlar 2024
Effect of a new support design on the marginal and internal gap of additively manufactured interim crowns using direct light deposition…
PMID:36810925
2024this review onlyMarginal fit (marginal discrepancy, um)not extracted yet
Radwan 2024
Trueness of vat-photopolymerization printing technology of interim fixed partial denture with different building orientation: A…
PMID:38725814
2024this review onlyMarginal fit (marginal discrepancy, um); Internal fit (internal discrepancy, um)not extracted yet
Ryu 2020
Marginal and internal fit of 3D printed provisional crowns according to build directions.
PMID:32879713
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yang 2022
Investigation of the marginal fit of a 3D-printed three-unit resin prosthesis with different build orientations and layer thicknesses.
PMID:36105878
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yu 2021
Evaluation of intaglio surface trueness and margin quality of interim crowns in accordance with the build angle of stereolithography…
PMID:32807402
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
Population3D-printed provisional fixed dental prostheses (in vitro or human studies)Provisional single crowns (n=4 studies) and three-unit FDPs (n=6 studies); tooth or implant abutments; in vitro specimens
InterventionNon-zero build orientationsBuild orientations from 0 to 270 degrees (most commonly 0, 45 and 90 degrees)
ComparisonZero-degree build orientation0 degree orientation; milled controls in 4 studies
OutcomesMarginal fit and internal fitMarginal fit (9 studies); internal fit (8 studies); margin quality (1 study)
Study designsHuman or in vitro studies in English10 in vitro studies (4 in meta-analysis)
TimingNot specifiedNot specified