evidencegaps
Primary study · included by 1 review

Trueness of vat-photopolymerization printing technology of interim fixed partial denture with different building orientation: A Microcomputed tomography study.

Radwan 2024 · Radwan Mohamed, Abdou Ahmed, Tawfik Ahmed, et al. · Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024

Included by

The effect of build orientation on the marginal and internal fit of 3-D printed provisional fixed dental prosthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Radwan 2024 · Table 2; Table 3; Figs. 3-8
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Internal fit (internal discrepancy, um)
Printing at 90 degree build orientation vs Printing at 0 degree build orientation · Not applicable
MD 3.76 [2.46, 5.06]2 studies · 168 participantsModerate
Marginal fit (marginal discrepancy, um)
Printing at 90 degree build orientation vs Printing at 0 degree build orientation · Not applicable
MD -15.52 [-17.5, -13.55]2 studies · 168 participantsModerate
Internal fit (internal discrepancy, um)
Printing at 270 degree build orientation vs Printing at 0 degree build orientation · Not applicable
MD -9.08 [-12.75, -5.41]1 study · 280 participantsModerate
Marginal fit (marginal discrepancy, um)
Printing at 270 degree build orientation vs Printing at 0 degree build orientation · Not applicable
MD -8.64 [-11.92, -5.37]1 study · 120 participantsModerate

1 including review in total.