Primary study · included by 1 review

Effect of Laser Therapy on the Osseointegration of Immediately Loaded Dental Implants in Patients under Vitamin C, Omega-3 and Calcium Therapy.

Mikhail 2018 · Mikhail Faten Fawzy, El-Din Mouchira, Ibrahim Tarek, et al. · Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2018

Included by

Photobiomodulation in Dental Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Mikhail 2018 · Reference 31; Figure 4b
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Peri-implant bone density (2D radiography, grayscale)
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · baseline
MD -0.38 [-6.62, 5.85]2 studiesGRADE not reported
Peri-implant bone density (2D radiography, grayscale)
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · 4 weeks
MD 5.3 [-8.12, 18.72]1 study · 11 participantsGRADE not reported
Peri-implant bone density (2D radiography, grayscale)
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · 6 weeks
MD 7.47 [-7.34, 22.28]1 study · 18 participantsGRADE not reported
Peri-implant bone density (2D radiography, grayscale)
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · 12 weeks
MD 15.7 [-3.4, 34.8]1 study · 11 participantsGRADE not reported
Peri-implant bone density (2D radiography, grayscale)
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · 6 months
MD 24.19 [0.89, 47.48]2 studiesGRADE not reported
Peri-implant bone density (2D radiography, grayscale)
Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · all time points
MD 9.82 [1.08, 18.56]2 studiesVery low

1 including review in total.