Primary study · included by 1 review

Photobiomodulation by a 635nm Diode Laser on Peri-Implant Bone: Primary and Secondary Stability and Bone Density Analysis-A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Matys 2019 · Matys Jacek, Świder Katarzyna, Grzech-Leśniak Kinga, et al. · BioMed research international · 2019

Included by

Photobiomodulation in Dental Implant Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Matys 2019 · Reference 33; Figure 3

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Peri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · all time points	MD 86.02 [-28.48, 200.52]	3 studies	Very low
Implant stability (Periotest) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · 8 weeks	MD -0.67 [-1.45, 0.11]	2 studies	GRADE not reported
Peri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · 12 weeks	MD 184.87 [-276.48, 646.22]	2 studies	GRADE not reported
Peri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · 6 weeks	MD -20.17 [-41.48, 1.13]	1 study · 20 participants	GRADE not reported
Implant stability (Periotest) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · all time points	MD -0.55 [-0.84, -0.27]	5 studies	Low
Implant stability (Periotest) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · baseline	MD -0.16 [-0.64, 0.32]	5 studies	GRADE not reported
Implant stability (Periotest) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · 4 weeks	MD -0.92 [-1.49, -0.34]	3 studies	GRADE not reported
Implant stability (Periotest) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · 6 months	MD -0.59 [-1.71, 0.54]	2 studies	GRADE not reported
Implant stability (Periotest) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · 2 weeks	MD -0.04 [-1.71, 1.62]	2 studies	GRADE not reported
Implant stability (Periotest) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · 12 weeks	MD -1.71 [-2.75, -0.67]	2 studies	GRADE not reported
Peri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · baseline	MD 114.07 [22.78, 205.36]	2 studies	GRADE not reported
Peri-implant bone density (3D CBCT, HU) Adjunctive photobiomodulation (laser or LED) vs Sham or no photobiomodulation · 4 weeks	MD -61.39 [-82.81, -39.97]	1 study · 38 participants	GRADE not reported

1 including review in total.