Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42087982

Decision-ready evidence for vital pulp therapy: a network meta-analysis of bioactive materials in mature permanent teeth.

Elmsmari Firas, Abdelsayed Reem B, Albasoumi Qamar, et al. · Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.3389/fdmed.2026.1780755

Findings

81 findings

Population
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureFull pulpotomy with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
12 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Pooled success rate (%) 90.8 [84.4, 97.2]
Moderate
4 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureFull pulpotomy with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
36 months · Clinical (dental)
No studies reported 3-year outcomes for full pulpotomy.
No studies found
0 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureFull pulpotomy with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
24 months · Clinical (dental)
Pooled success rate (%) 99.1 [96.4, 100]
GRADE not reported
1 study
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureFull pulpotomy with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Pooled success rate (%) 96.7 [92.2, 100]
Moderate
2 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureFull pulpotomy with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
12 months · Clinical (dental) · Material: CEM
Pooled success rate (%) 95.3 [87.9, 100]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposurePartial pulpotomy with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
24 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Pooled success rate (%) 85.9 [70.8, 100]
Moderate
3 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposurePartial pulpotomy with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6 months · Clinical (dental) · Material: MTA
Pooled success rate (%) 89.2 [80.6, 97.7]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Mature permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure treated by full pulpotomyMTANone (single pooled success proportion across arms)Composite success (clinical and radiographic)
1 year · Clinical settings · Biomaterial subgroup: MTA
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Subgroup diamond printed as 0.832 [0.882, 1.082]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposurePartial pulpotomy with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
12 months · Clinical (dental)
Pooled success rate (%) 84.8 [67.0, 100]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposurePartial pulpotomy with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Pooled success rate (%) 84.0 [73.2, 94.8]
Moderate
2 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposurePartial pulpotomy with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
12 months · Clinical (dental) · Material: MTA
Pooled success rate (%) 93 [76.8, 100]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposurePartial pulpotomy with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
36 months · Clinical (dental)
Pooled success rate (%) 94.3 [86.5, 100]
GRADE not reported
6 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposurePartial pulpotomy with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
24 months · Clinical (dental) · Material: Biodentine
Pooled success rate (%) 93.6 [80.6, 100]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposurePartial pulpotomy with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
24 months · Clinical (dental) · Material: MTA
Pooled success rate (%) 93.6 [85.4, 100]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6 months · Clinical (dental) · Material: CaOH
Pooled success rate (%) 74.4 [66.2, 88.6]
GRADE not reported
4 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
12 months · Clinical (dental) · Material: CaOH
Pooled success rate (%) 85.9 [69.2, 100]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
36 months · Clinical (dental) · Material: MTA
Pooled success rate (%) 85.7 [79.8, 91.5]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
36 months · Clinical (dental) · Material: Biodentine
Pooled success rate (%) 81.1 [72.7, 89.6]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Pooled success rate (%) 89.0 [85.0, 93.1]
Moderate
8 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
24 months · Clinical (dental)
Pooled success rate (%) 100 [88.7, 100]
GRADE not reported
1 study
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
36 months · Clinical (dental) · Material: CaOH
Pooled success rate (%) 62.8 [46.9, 78.8]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
36 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Pooled success rate (%) 78.1 [70.2, 86.1]
Moderate
3 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
12 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Pooled success rate (%) 89.2 [84.5, 93.8]
Moderate
7 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
12 months · Clinical (dental) · Material: CEM
Pooled success rate (%) 88.5 [79.5, 97.4]
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
12 months · Clinical (dental) · Material: Biodentine
Pooled success rate (%) 92.9 [79.4, 100]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureIndirect pulp capping with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Pooled success rate (%) 93.2 [88.8, 97.6]
Moderate
5 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureIndirect pulp capping with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6 months · Clinical (dental) · Material: MTA
Pooled success rate (%) 94.4 [84.4, 100]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureIndirect pulp capping with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6 months · Clinical (dental) · Material: CaOH
Pooled success rate (%) 88.1 [66.3, 100]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureIndirect pulp capping with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6 months · Clinical (dental) · Material: Biodentine
Pooled success rate (%) 92.1 [82.8, 100]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureIndirect pulp capping with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
24 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Pooled success rate (%) 98.7 [96.1, 100]
Moderate
2 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureIndirect pulp capping with any bioactive material (all materials pooled)None (pooled single-arm success proportion)Composite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
12 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Pooled success rate (%) 96.8 [94.8, 98.8]
Moderate
5 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureFull pulpotomy with MTAFull pulpotomy with BiodentineComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
12 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Table 4: CrIs overlap, no clear difference; inconclusive due to imprecision
Moderate
Downgraded: imprecision
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureFull pulpotomy with CEMFull pulpotomy with MTAComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
12 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Table 4: CrIs overlap, no clear difference; inconclusive
Moderate
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureFull pulpotomy with BiodentineFull pulpotomy with CEMComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
12 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Table 4: CrIs overlap, no clear difference; comparisons imprecise
Moderate
Downgraded: imprecision
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposurePartial pulpotomy with MTA, Biodentine or CaOH (network)Partial pulpotomy with each otherComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
No statistically significant differences in performance across any of the biomaterials; all pairwise credible intervals spanned the null
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposurePartial pulpotomy with BiodentinePartial pulpotomy with CaOHComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
12 months · Clinical (dental)
log OR 13.7 [-1.55, 55.4]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure treated by partial pulpotomyMTACaOHComposite success (clinical and radiographic)
6 months · Clinical settings · Network meta-analysis
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
No statistically significant difference; all pairwise credible intervals spanned the null
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposurePartial pulpotomy with BiodentinePartial pulpotomy with MTAComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
12 months · Clinical (dental)
log OR 15.1 [0.27, 56.8]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure treated by partial pulpotomyBiodentineCaOHComposite success (clinical and radiographic)
6 months · Clinical settings · Network meta-analysis
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
No statistically significant difference; all pairwise credible intervals spanned the null
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposurePartial pulpotomy with BiodentinePartial pulpotomy with MTAComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
24 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Meta-regression beta coefficient (success proportion) 0.003 [-0.142, 0.149]
Moderate
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposurePartial pulpotomy with CaOHPartial pulpotomy with MTAComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
12 months · Clinical (dental)
log OR 1.49 [-0.79, 3.85]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposurePartial pulpotomy with MTAPartial pulpotomy with CaOHComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6-12 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Table 4: CrIs overlap, no clear difference; inconclusive comparison
Low
Studies not reported
Mature permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure treated by partial pulpotomyMTABiodentineComposite success (clinical and radiographic)
6 months · Clinical settings · Network meta-analysis
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
No statistically significant difference; all pairwise credible intervals spanned the null
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with MTADirect pulp capping with CaOHComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Network meta-analysis: MTA had better results than CaOH; estimate not reported
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with MTADirect pulp capping with CaOHComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6-36 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Table 4: CrIs exclude 0, favors MTA; consistent superiority of MTA supported by high-certainty evidence
High
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with CaOHDirect pulp capping with MTAComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6 months · Clinical (dental)
Meta-regression difference in success (percentage points) -19.2
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with CaOHDirect pulp capping with MTAComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
36 months · Clinical (dental)
Meta-regression beta coefficient (success proportion) -0.215
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with CaOHDirect pulp capping with MTA-like materialsComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6 months · Clinical (dental)
Meta-regression difference in success (percentage points) -11.4
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with laser-assisted therapyDirect pulp capping with BiodentineComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Network meta-analysis: laser-assisted therapy had higher success than Biodentine; estimate not reported
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure treated by direct pulp cappingMTA-like materialsNone (single pooled success proportion across arms)Composite success (clinical and radiographic)
6 months · Clinical settings · Biomaterial subgroup: MTA-like
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Pooled success rate (%) 84.3 [73.3, 84.8]
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Mature permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure treated by direct pulp cappingMTANone (single pooled success proportion across arms)Composite success (clinical and radiographic)
6 months · Clinical settings · Biomaterial subgroup: MTA
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Subgroup diamond printed as 0.826 [0.880, 0.976]
GRADE not reported
7 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with laser-assisted therapyDirect pulp capping with CaOHComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Network meta-analysis: laser-assisted therapy had higher success than CaOH; estimate not reported
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure treated by direct pulp cappingMTANone (single pooled success proportion across arms)Composite success (clinical and radiographic)
1 year · Clinical settings · Biomaterial subgroup: MTA
Pooled success rate (%) 92 [86.6, 97.3]
GRADE not reported
7 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with CEMDirect pulp capping with BiodentineComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Network meta-analysis: CEM had higher success than Biodentine; estimate not reported
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with CEMDirect pulp capping with CaOHComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Network meta-analysis: CEM had higher success than CaOH; estimate not reported
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure treated by direct pulp cappingBiodentineNone (single pooled success proportion across arms)Composite success (clinical and radiographic)
6 months · Clinical settings · Biomaterial subgroup: Biodentine
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Pooled success rate (%) 91
GRADE not reported
5 studies
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with MTA, CEM, Biodentine, CaOH, PRF, PRP or MTA-like (network)Direct pulp capping with each otherComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
12 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Network meta-analysis found no statistically significant difference
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with BiodentineDirect pulp capping with CaOHComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6-36 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Table 4: borderline/narrow CrIs, favors Biodentine; likely superiority
Moderate
Studies not reported
Mature permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure treated by direct pulp cappingMTACaOHComposite success (clinical and radiographic)
3 years · Clinical settings · Network meta-analysis
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
MTA significantly higher probability of success than calcium hydroxide
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureDirect pulp capping with MTADirect pulp capping with BiodentineComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
All timepoints · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Table 4: CrIs overlap, no clear difference; cannot establish superiority
Moderate
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureIndirect pulp capping with Biodentine, CaOH, CSC, GIC or laser (network)Indirect pulp capping with each otherComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
12 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Network meta-analysis: no statistically significant differences detected between biomaterials; overlapping credible intervals and moderate certainty
Moderate
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureIndirect pulp capping with MTAIndirect pulp capping with CaOHComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6-12 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Table 4: CrIs overlap, no clear difference; no material advantage demonstrated
Moderate
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureIndirect pulp capping with BiodentineIndirect pulp capping with CaOHComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6-12 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Table 4: CrIs overlap, no clear difference; inconclusive comparison
Moderate
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureIndirect pulp capping with BiodentineIndirect pulp capping with MTAComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6-12 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Table 4: CrIs overlap, no clear difference; cannot establish superiority
Moderate
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureIndirect pulp capping with laser-assisted therapyIndirect pulp capping with other materialsComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Table 4: CrIs exclude 0, less favorable; sparse and uncertain evidence
Low
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureIndirect pulp capping with CEMIndirect pulp capping with other materialsComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
6 months · Clinical (dental)
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Table 4: CrIs variable/sparse, trends favorable; based on limited evidence only
Low
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureVital pulp therapy with MTAVital pulp therapy with CaOHComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
Clinical (dental) · Sensitivity analysis: Half-Cauchy prior
log OR -1.06
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureVital pulp therapy with MTAVital pulp therapy with CaOHComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
Clinical (dental) · Sensitivity analysis: Arm-based continuity correction
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
log OR -1.07
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureVital pulp therapy with MTAVital pulp therapy with CaOHComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
Clinical (dental) · Sensitivity analysis: No sparse nodes
log OR -1.01
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureVital pulp therapy with MTAVital pulp therapy with CaOHComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
Clinical (dental) · Sensitivity analysis: Base
log OR -1.10
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureVital pulp therapy with MTAVital pulp therapy with CaOHComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
Clinical (dental) · Sensitivity analysis: Classic continuity correction
log OR -1.08
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureVital pulp therapy with MTAVital pulp therapy with CaOHComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
Clinical (dental) · Sensitivity analysis: Beta-binomial likelihood
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
log OR -1.02
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureVital pulp therapy with BiodentineVital pulp therapy with CaOHComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
Clinical (dental) · Sensitivity analysis: Half-Cauchy prior
log OR -0.79
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureVital pulp therapy with BiodentineVital pulp therapy with CaOHComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
Clinical (dental) · Sensitivity analysis: Base
log OR -0.82
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureVital pulp therapy with BiodentineVital pulp therapy with CaOHComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
Clinical (dental) · Sensitivity analysis: Beta-binomial likelihood
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
log OR -0.76
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureVital pulp therapy with BiodentineVital pulp therapy with CaOHComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
Clinical (dental) · Sensitivity analysis: Arm-based continuity correction
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
log OR -0.80
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureVital pulp therapy with BiodentineVital pulp therapy with CaOHComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
Clinical (dental) · Sensitivity analysis: Classic continuity correction
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
log OR -0.81
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature (closed apex) permanent teeth with carious pulp exposureVital pulp therapy with BiodentineVital pulp therapy with CaOHComposite clinical and radiographic success of vital pulp therapy
Clinical (dental) · Sensitivity analysis: No sparse nodes
log OR -0.75
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Mature permanent teeth with deep caries treated by indirect pulp cappingMTANone (single pooled success proportion across arms)Composite success (clinical and radiographic)
1 year · Clinical settings · Biomaterial subgroup: MTA
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Pooled success rate (%) 98.3
GRADE not reported
2 studies
Mature permanent teeth with deep caries treated by indirect pulp cappingCaOHNone (single pooled success proportion across arms)Composite success (clinical and radiographic)
1 year · Clinical settings · Biomaterial subgroup: CaOH
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Pooled success rate (%) 99.2
GRADE not reported
3 studies
Mature permanent teeth with deep caries treated by indirect pulp cappingBiodentineNone (single pooled success proportion across arms)Composite success (clinical and radiographic)
1 year · Clinical settings · Biomaterial subgroup: Biodentine
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
Pooled success rate (%) 98.7
GRADE not reported
2 studies

Included primary studies 48

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Doranala et al. 2022
Microvessel reactions and NAD-NADH changes in cat brain cortex during cortical stimulation under normo- and hypercapnic conditions.
PMID:202240
19773 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Awawdeh et al. 2018
The induction of chromosome aberrations in mouse dictyate oocytes by X-rays and chemical mutagens.
PMID:201837
19772 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Uesrichai et al. 2019
[Enkephalins--endorphins- endogenous opiate agonists].
PMID:201936
19772 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Arshad et al. 2019
Paradoxical effects of calcium-glucagon interaction on cardiac muscle contractility of isolated guinea pig atria.
PMID:201943
19771 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Asgary 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Asgary et al. 2012
Interaction of butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) with phospholipid bilayer membranes: effect on 22Na permeability and membrane fluidity.
PMID:201255
19771 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Awawdeh 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Hegde et al. 2017
1,2,4-Triazole amino nucleosides. 1-beta-D-3'-Amino-3'-deoxyribofuranosyl-1,2,4-triazole-3-carboxamide and related nucleosides.
PMID:201758
19771 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Iyer et al. 2021
False negative bone scans in neuroblastoma metastatic to the ends of long bones.
PMID:202156
19781 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Kundzina et al. 2016
Altered biochemical properties of mitochondria in mouse mammary epithelial cells during primary culture.
PMID:201649
19771 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Parameswaran et al. 2023
[Effect of cholesterol on membrane Na,K-activated adenosine triphosphatase].
PMID:202351
19771 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Selvendran et al. 2022
Brain energy metabolism of the conscious rat exposed to ischemic conditions.
PMID:202241
19771 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Sharaan et al. 2022
Viral pathogenesis and molecular biology.
PMID:202238
19771 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Sharma 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Sharma et al. 2020
Disturbances of perinatal carbohydrate metabolism in rats exposed to methylmercury in utero.
PMID:202042
19771 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Singh 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Suhag 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Taha 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Taha et al. 2017
The experience of schizophrenia.
PMID:201754
19771 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Uesrichai 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Arshad 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Asgary 2012
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Asgary et al. 2022
Peripheral polyneuropathy associated with primary malignant lymphoma of the brain.
PMID:202235
1978this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Cengiz 2015
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Cengiz and Yilmaz 2015
Effect of cold exposure on alpha-MSH and ACTH release in the rat.
PMID:201553
1977this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Doranala 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hashem 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hashem et al. 2019
Study into the mechanism of acetylsalicylic acid-induced bronchoconstriction.
PMID:201944
1977this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Hegde 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Iyer 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jang 2015
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jang et al. 2015
[The collum carcinoma; prevention--treatment--after care. 3. After care].
PMID:201548
1977this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kundzina 2016
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Parameswaran 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Parinyaprom 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Parinyaprom et al. 2017
Subsensitivity of dopamine-stimulated cAMP response in rat striatal and medial frontal cortex slices following treatment with dopamine…
PMID:201747
1977this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Peskersoy 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Peskersoy et al. 2020
[Acute gastroenteritis caused by rotavirus. A summary of Danish studies].
PMID:202050
1977this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Selvendran 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sharaan 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shobana 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Shobana et al. 2022
Synthesis of haem and cytochrome c prosthetic group from delta-aminolaevulinate by the cell sap from rat liver.
PMID:202245
1977this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Singh et al. 2019
The mechanism by which the energy is released at the level of the flavoenzyme molecule during the transfer of two electrons.
PMID:201952
1977this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Singla 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Singla et al. 2023
A fluorescence study of the binding of cytochrome C to mixed-phospholipid microvesicles : evidence for a preferred orientation of the…
PMID:202339
1977this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Suhag et al. 2019
Effect of carboxypeptidase N, aprotinin and anti-inflammatory drugs of pyrazolidine type on experimental inflammations in rats.
PMID:201946
1978this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Vural 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Vural et al. 2017
Molecular orbital studies on the mechanism of drug-receptor interaction. 2. beta-Adrenergic drugs. An approach to explain the role of the…
PMID:201757
1977this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

ReviewShared studiesJaccard
Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious teeth: A systematic review and… (2023)40.06
Effect of intraarticular drug injection in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders with limited mouth opening: a system review and… (2025)20.02
Accessory Mandibular Foramina: An Anatomical Study in Dry Mandibles and Meta-Analysis. (2026)20.02
Resonance Frequency Analysis and Clinical Outcomes in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2026)20.01
Fluoride release and mechanical properties of S-PRG fillers in dental materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2026)20.02
Genetic Variants and Dental Caries Susceptibility: An Umbrella Review and Multilevel Meta-Analysis. (2026)20.02
Dental caries in primary and permanent teeth in children's worldwide, 1995 to 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2020)10.00
Impact of oral conditions on oral health-related quality of life among Indians- a systematic review and Meta-analysis. (2023)10.01
Prognostic value of NLR versus PLR and LMR in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis. (2026)10.01
Effect of root canal filling techniques and materials on endodontic treatment outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2026)10.00
Hepatitis B Virus Infection and Risk Factors Among Pregnant Women in Healthcare Facilities in West Africa: A Systematic Review and… (2026)10.01
Neural biomarkers in pulpitis and their associations with inflammation and pain perception: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2026)10.01
Accuracy and Reliability of Dental Age Estimation Methods in Iranian Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2026)10.01
Risk of cancer in periodontal disease: an umbrella review of meta-analyses. (2026)10.01
Grading the evidence for the association between periodontal disease and chronic non-communicable diseases: an umbrella review of… (2026)10.01
Global prevalence of recurrent aphthous stomatitis among school and university students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2026)10.01

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPermanent teeth with carious exposure and mature (closed) apices, including symptomatic presentations24 RCTs in mature permanent teeth (primary NMA; 11 RCTs in immature teeth analyzed separately); 2906 teeth across 35 RCTs
InterventionVital pulp therapy (full pulpotomy, partial pulpotomy, direct pulp capping, indirect pulp capping) with any eligible pulp-capping material (MTA, Biodentine, MTA-like, Ca(OH)2, CEM, PRF/PRP, laser, GIC, RMGIC, potassium nitrate)Full pulpotomy, partial pulpotomy, direct pulp capping, indirect pulp capping with ten biomaterial categories (MTA, MTA-like, Biodentine, Ca(OH)2, CEM, PRF, PRP, laser, GIC, RMGIC)
ComparisonAny head-to-head comparison of materials within the same modalityMaterial versus material within each modality
OutcomesPrimary: composite clinical and radiographic success at 6, 12, 24, 36 months; secondary: clinical success alone, failure, attritionComposite success (clinical and radiographic); pooled success mostly above 90% across modalities and timepoints
Study designsRandomized controlled trials (at least 2 parallel arms)RCTs (n=24 mature teeth)
Timing6, 12, 24 and 36 months6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalNoPartial Yesno
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesPartial Yesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalNRSI: N/A · RCT: YesNRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesyes
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalNRSI: N/A · RCT: NoNRSI: N/A · RCT: Noyes
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalYesYesyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes