Exercise vs no intervention
Adverse events · participants with haemophilia
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
1,228 questions · 1,245 findings · 383 reviews
No studies found 403 · 32.4%GRADE not reported 128 · 10.3%Very low 385 · 30.9%Low 232 · 18.6%Moderate 81 · 6.5%High 16 · 1.3%
Breastfeeding vs other interventions, oral water, or no treatment
Adverse events · Infants 1 to 12 months during vaccination
1 finding from 1 review
- Breastfeeding for procedural pain in infants beyond the neonatal period 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedVery low
Preoperative inspiratory muscle training vs usual care, non‐exercise intervention
Adverse events · adult participants undergoing cardiac and major abdominal surgery
1 finding from 1 review
- Preoperative inspiratory muscle training for postoperative pulmonary complications in adults undergoing cardiac and… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted8 studies · 462 participantsLow
Enteral nutrition vs no intervention
Adverse events · patients with acute pancreatitis
It is very uncertain whether enteral nutrition changes adverse events compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 9 [0.49, 165.14]1 study · 214 participantsVery low
Chinese herbal medicines vs no intervention
Serious adverse events · patients with osteoporosis
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsGRADE not reported
Ursodeoxycholic acid vs placebo or no intervention
Serious adverse events · patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.
It is very uncertain whether ursodeoxycholic acid changes serious adverse events compared with placebo or no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.87 [0.68, 1.12]14 studies · 1382 participantsVery low
Ursodeoxycholic acid vs placebo or no intervention
Non‐serious adverse events · patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.
It is very uncertain whether ursodeoxycholic acid changes non‐serious adverse events compared with placebo or no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1.46 [0.83, 2.56]12 studies · 1277 participantsVery low
Spinal manipulative therapy vs inert interventions
Serious adverse events · Patients with acute low‐back pain
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted2 studies · 2 participantsGRADE not reported
Spinal manipulative therapy vs other interventions
Serious adverse events · Patients with acute low‐back pain
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted2 studies · 2 participantsGRADE not reported
Bezafibrate vs no intervention
Adverse events · patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.
It is very uncertain whether bezafibrate changes adverse events compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 5.4 [0.69, 42.32]3 studies · 60 participantsVery low
Bisphosphonates vs placebo or no intervention
Adverse events · patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.
It is very uncertain whether bisphosphonates changes adverse events compared with placebo or no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Bisphosphonates for osteoporosis in primary biliary cirrhosis 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 1 [0.49, 2.04]2 studies · 46 participantsVery low
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) vs placebo or no intervention
Adverse events · women with primary biliary cirrhosis.
It is very uncertain whether hormone replacement changes adverse events compared with placebo or no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Hormone replacement for osteoporosis in women with primary biliary cirrhosis 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 5.26 [1.26, 22.04]2 studies · 49 participantsVery low
Hypnosis vs No hypnosis (no hypnotic intervention)
Adverse events · Children undergoing dental and orthodontic treatment (Gokli 1994; Trakyali 2008)
1 finding from 1 review
- None of the studies mentioned any adverse effects regarding hypnosis. (Gokli 1994; Trakyali 2008.)2 studies · 59 participantsGRADE not reported
Induced hypertension vs placebo or no intervention
Proportion of participants with ≥ 1 serious adverse events · people with acute subarachnoid haemorrhage
It is very uncertain whether induced hypertension changes proportion of participants with ≥ 1 serious adverse events compared with placebo or no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Interventions for altering blood pressure in people with acute subarachnoid haemorrhage 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 2.24 [1.01, 4.99]2 studies · 61 participantsVery low
Band ligation vs no intervention or a sham procedure
Serious adverse events Idiopathic thrombocytopaenic purpura · children with portal hypertension and large oesophageal varices, without previous gastrointestinal bleeding or beta‐blocker treatment
It is very uncertain whether band ligation changes serious adverse events Idiopathic thrombocytopaenic purpura compared with sham or no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Band ligation versus sham or no intervention for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children and… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 0.28 [0.01, 6.25]1 study · 22 participantsVery low
Fibrin‐based haemostatic agents vs placebo or no intervention
Serious adverse events Median · adults undergoing liver resection for cancer or benign disease
It is very uncertain whether fibrin‐based haemostatic agents changes serious adverse events Median compared with no intervention or placebo (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Fibrin‐based haemostatic agents for reducing blood loss in adult liver resection 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 0.96 [0.88, 1.05]4 studies · 782 participantsVery low
Radix Sophorae flavescentis vs placebo or no intervention
Proportion of participants with 1 or more serious adverse events · chronic hepatitis B
1 finding from 1 review
- Radix Sophorae flavescentis versus no intervention or placebo for chronic hepatitis B 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted10 studies · 1140 participantsVery low
Intervention not reported
Adverse events related to RIPC · patients undergoing a surgical intervention that induces kidney injury
The intervention showed no clear difference in adverse events related to RIPC (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Ischaemic preconditioning for the reduction of renal ischaemia reperfusion injury 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 3.47 [0.55, 21.76]Studies not reportedHigh
Antibiotics vs no intervention
Minor adverse events · newborns with congenital syphilis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Video feedback vs no intervention or inactive alternative intervention
Adverse events: parental stress · parent‐child dyads (including foster or adoptive carers), where the child was aged between birth and four years 11 months (inclusive), and…
1 finding from 1 review
- Video feedback for parental sensitivity and attachment security in children under five years 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted8 studies · 537 participantsLow