Cochrane · systematic review · CD013089

Radix Sophorae flavescentis versus no intervention or placebo for chronic hepatitis B

Liang, N, Kong, DZ, Ma, SS, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · Cochrane Library

Hepato-BiliaryAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
3
Included studies
NR
No studies 3 · 42.9%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 4 · 57.1%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Radix Sophorae flavescentis versus no intervention or placebo for chronic hepatitis B

Population: chronic hepatitis B
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
All‐cause mortality
Radix Sophorae flavescentis vs no intervention or placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 86 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Proportion of participants with 1 or more serious adverse events
Radix Sophorae flavescentis vs no intervention or placebo
no estimate extracted10 studies · 1140 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Health‐related quality of life
Radix Sophorae flavescentis vs no intervention or placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Hepatitis B‐related mortality
Radix Sophorae flavescentis vs no intervention or placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Hepatitis B‐related morbidity
Radix Sophorae flavescentis vs no intervention or placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Proportion of participants with 1 or more adverse events considered 'not to be serious' (at maximum
Radix Sophorae flavescentis vs no intervention or placebo
RR 1.1 [0.76, 1.59]10 studies · 1050 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Surrogate outcomes: Proportion of participants with detectable HBV‐DNA (at maximum
Radix Sophorae flavescentis vs no intervention or placebo
RR 0.61 [0.55, 0.68]29 studies · 2914 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, publication bias