Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42740455

Emerging, personalized, and minimally invasive technologies for periodontal and peri-implant soft and hard tissue regenerative therapy.

Barootchi Shayan, Tavelli Lorenzo, Sabri Hamoun, et al. · Journal of periodontology · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1002/jper.70108

Findings

31 findings

Population
Adults with natural teeth needing soft tissue thickness augmentationCTG (bilaminar approach)Flap therapy alone (no soft tissue augmentation)gingival thickness (GT) change
12 months minimum (6 to 144 months reported; data beyond 72 months not analyzed) · Randomized clinical trials, mostly university settings
MD 0.62 [0.47, 0.77]
High
54 studies · 2972 participants
Adults with gingival soft tissue defects around natural teethVCMX with flapFlap aloneGingival thickness gain (mm)MD 0.57 [0.21, 0.93]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with gingival soft tissue defects around natural teethhADM with flapFlap aloneGingival thickness gain (mm)MD 0.48 [0.28, 0.67]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with gingival soft tissue defects around natural teethpADM with flapFlap aloneGingival thickness gain (mm)MD 0.47 [0.15, 0.81]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with gingival soft tissue defects around natural teethCMX with flapFlap aloneGingival thickness gain (mm)MD 0.33 [0.17, 0.49]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with natural teeth needing soft tissue thickness augmentationFlap therapy aloneCTG (connective tissue graft), bilaminar approachgingival thickness (GT) change
12 months minimum (6 to 144 months reported; data beyond 72 months not analyzed) · Randomized clinical trials, mostly university settings
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
MD -0.62 [-0.77, -0.48]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with gingival soft tissue defects around natural teethCMX with flapCTG with flapGingival thickness gain (mm)MD -0.28 [-0.43, -0.14]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with gingival soft tissue defects around natural teethhADM with flapCTG with flapGingival thickness gain (mm)MD -0.14 [-0.34, 0.05]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with gingival soft tissue defects around natural teethVCMX with flapCTG with flapGingival thickness gain (mm)MD -0.05 [-0.71, 0.61]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with gingival soft tissue defects around natural teethpADM with flapCTG with flapGingival thickness gain (mm)MD -0.14 [-0.43, 0.14]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults requiring peri-implant soft tissue augmentationCMXNo soft tissue augmentationMucosal thickness gain (mm)MD 0.68 [0.42, 0.95]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults requiring peri-implant soft tissue augmentationpADMNo soft tissue augmentationMucosal thickness gain (mm)MD 0.71 [0.12, 1.29]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults requiring peri-implant soft tissue augmentationVCMXNo soft tissue augmentationMucosal thickness gain (mm)MD 0.88 [0.21, 1.54]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults requiring peri-implant soft tissue augmentationhADMNo soft tissue augmentationMucosal thickness gain (mm)MD 0.98 [0.62, 1.33]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults requiring peri-implant soft tissue augmentationCMXCTGMucosal thickness gain (mm)MD -0.44 [-0.62, -0.26]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults requiring peri-implant soft tissue augmentationADMCTGMucosal thickness gain (mm)MD -0.14 [-0.17, 0.46]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults requiring peri-implant soft tissue augmentationXCMCTGMucosal thickness gain (mm)MD -0.24 [-0.56, 0.08]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with gingival soft tissue defects around natural teethBaseline gingival thicknessNoneGingival thickness gain (mm)Regression coefficient 0.49 [0.22, 0.76]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with gingival soft tissue defects around natural teethBaseline keratinized tissue widthNoneGingival thickness gain (mm)Regression coefficient 0.019 [-0.08, 0.12]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with dental implants needing peri-implant mucosal thickness augmentationCTG (bilaminar approach)No soft tissue augmentation (untreated sites)mucosal thickness (MT) change
6 months minimum (6 to 48 months) · Randomized clinical trials, mostly university settings
MD 1.12 [0.91, 1.33]
High
24 studies · 851 participants
Adults with gingival soft tissue defects around natural teethBaseline gingival recessionNoneGingival thickness gain (mm)Regression coefficient 0.05 [-0.05, 0.16]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with dental implants needing peri-implant mucosal thickness augmentationNo soft tissue augmentationCTG (connective tissue graft), bilaminar approachmucosal thickness (MT) change
6 months minimum (6 to 48 months) · Randomized clinical trials, mostly university settings
Unresolved: the two extractors disagree on this row.
MD -1.12 [-1.33, -0.91]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with gingival soft tissue defects around natural teethTimeNoneGingival thickness gain (mm)Regression coefficient -0.0009 [-0.001, 0.00009]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with gingival soft tissue defects around natural teethIncrease in gingival thicknessNoneGingival recession over timeRegression coefficient -0.16 [-0.31, -0.01]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults with gingival soft tissue defects around natural teethIncrease in gingival thicknessNonePlaque index over timeRegression coefficient -0.39 [-0.64, -0.13]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults requiring peri-implant soft tissue augmentationBaseline mucosal thicknessNoneMucosal thickness gain (mm)Regression coefficient 1.04 [0.75, 1.33]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults requiring peri-implant soft tissue augmentationBaseline keratinized tissueNoneMucosal thickness gain (mm)Regression coefficient -0.12 [-0.54, 0.28]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults requiring peri-implant soft tissue augmentationTimeNoneMucosal thickness gain (mm)Regression coefficient -0.01 [-0.02, 0.0006]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults requiring peri-implant soft tissue augmentationMucosal thickness augmentationNoneProbing depthRegression coefficient -0.81 [-1.25, -0.35]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults requiring peri-implant soft tissue augmentationMucosal thickness augmentationNoneBleeding on probingRegression coefficient -0.52 [-3.26, 2.21]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adults requiring peri-implant soft tissue augmentationMucosal thickness augmentationNonePlaque indexRegression coefficient -1.4 [-7.87, 5.07]
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported

Included primary studies 170

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Ferrarotti 2018
Human intrabony defect regeneration with micrografts containing dental pulp stem cells: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
PMID:29779220
20184 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Chen 2016
Treatment of periodontal intrabony defects using autologous periodontal ligament stem cells: a randomized clinical trial.
PMID:26895633
20163 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Sanchez 2020
Periodontal regeneration using a xenogeneic bone substitute seeded with autologous periodontal ligament-derived mesenchymal stem cells: A…
PMID:32946590
20203 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Aroca 2013
Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller class I and II gingival recessions with a Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT) technique and a…
PMID:23627374
20132 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Bajestan 2017
Stem cell therapy for reconstruction of alveolar cleft and trauma defects in adults: A randomized controlled, clinical trial.
PMID:28656723
20172 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Cairo 2017
Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus connective tissue graft for buccal soft tissue augmentation at implant site. A randomized, controlled…
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.12750
20172 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Clem 2024
Harvest graft substitute for soft tissue volume augmentation around existing implants: A randomized, controlled and blinded multicenter…
DOI:10.1002/jper.23-0305
20232 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Fatale 2022
Histomorphometric Comparison of New Bone Formed After Maxillary Sinus Lift With Lateral and Crestal Approaches Using Periostal Mesenchymal…
PMID:36041126
20222 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Gjerde 2018
Cell therapy induced regeneration of severely atrophied mandibular bone in a clinical trial.
PMID:30092840
20182 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Gupta 2021
A comparative evaluation of bone regeneration using mesenchymal stem cells versus blood coagulum in sinus augmentation procedures.
PMID:35153430
20212 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Hamdy 2024
Volumetric assessment of volume stable collagen matrix in maxillary single implant site development: A randomized controlled clinical trial
DOI:10.1111/cid.13353
20242 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Kaigler 2013
Stem cell therapy for craniofacial bone regeneration: a randomized, controlled feasibility trial.
PMID:22776413
20132 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Kaigler 2015
Bone Engineering of Maxillary Sinus Bone Deficiencies Using Enriched CD90+ Stem Cell Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
PMID:25652112
20152 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Khojasteh 2019
Buccal fat pad-derived stem cells with anorganic bovine bone mineral scaffold for augmentation of atrophic posterior mandible: An…
PMID:30821120
20192 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Meza‐Mauricio 2021
Comparison between a xenogeneic dermal matrix and connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions: a…
PMID:34021404
20212 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Payer 2014
Effects of directly autotransplanted tibial bone marrow aspirates on bone regeneration and osseointegration of dental implants.
PMID:23701676
20142 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Pietruska 2019
Clinical evaluation of Miller class I and II recessions treatment with the use of modified coronally advanced tunnel technique with either…
PMID:30362599
20192 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Rakasevic 2020
The use of collagen porcine dermal matrix and connective tissue graft with modified coronally advanced tunnel technique in the treatment…
PMID:32706184
20202 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Whitt 2020
Efficacy of stem cell allograft in maxillary sinus bone regeneration: a randomized controlled clinical and blinded histomorphometric study.
PMID:32596764
20202 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Abdelwahab 2023
Soft tissue esthetics around immediately provisionalized delayed implants with and without connective tissue graft: A randomized clinical…
DOI:10.1111/cid.13168
20221 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Ahmedbeyli 2014
Clinical evaluation of coronally advanced flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft on complete defect coverage for the treatment…
PMID:24304099
20141 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Ahmedbeyli 2019
Coronally advanced flap and envelope type of flap plus acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of thin phenotype multiple…
PMID:31350924
20191 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Aimetti 2018
Regenerative Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects Using Autologous Dental Pulp Stem Cells: A 1-Year Follow-Up Case Series.
PMID:29240205
20181 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Asahina 2021
Clinical Outcome and 8-Year Follow-Up of Alveolar Bone Tissue Engineering for Severely Atrophic Alveolar Bone Using Autologous Bone Marrow…
PMID:34830513
20211 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Baba 2016
Phase I/II Trial of Autologous Bone Marrow Stem Cell Transplantation with a Three-Dimensional Woven-Fabric Scaffold for Periodontitis.
PMID:27990164
20161 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Cairo 2016
Clinical efficacy of coronally advanced flap with or without connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival…
PMID:27329829
20161 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Cairo 2017
Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus connective tissue graft for buccal soft tissue augmentation at implant site. A randomized, controlled…
PMID:28548210
20171 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Carrera 2023
Root coverage with platelet-rich fibrin or connective tissue graft: a split-mouth randomized trial.
PMID:37672418
20231 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Chen 2023
Does vestibular incision improve the outcomes of vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel technique: A randomized clinical trial for…
PMID:37078417
20231 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Clem 2024
Harvest graft substitute for soft tissue volume augmentation around existing implants: A randomized, controlled and blinded multicenter…
PMID:38071454
20241 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
D'Elia 2017
Peri-implant Soft Tissue Stability After Single Implant Restorations Using Either Guided Bone Regeneration or a Connective Tissue Graft: A…
DOI:10.11607/prd.2747
20171 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Elena 2024
Analysis of the treatment of RT2 recessions with a xenogeneic collagen matrix vs. connective tissue graft combined with a coronally…
PMID:38489063
20241 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Feng 2021
Small blood stem cells for enhancing early osseointegration formation on dental implants: a human phase I safety study.
PMID:34215319
20211 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Górski 2022
Effect of 24% EDTA root conditioning on the outcome of modified coronally advanced tunnel technique with subepithelial connective tissue…
PMID:34431001
20221 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Hamdy 2024
Volumetric assessment of volume stable collagen matrix in maxillary single implant site development: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
PMID:38938060
20241 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Kassis 2024
The Effect of Connective Tissue Graft Compared to Concentrated Growth Factor Graft on Buccal Peri-Implant Gingival Thickness: A 12-month…
DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2024.02.005
20241 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Kuka 2018
Clinical evaluation of coronally advanced flap with or without platelet-rich fibrin for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions.
PMID:29058084
20181 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Lazzari 2022
Single implant placement in the maxillary aesthetic area with or without connective tissue grafting: A 1-year follow-up randomised…
PMID:35266669
20221 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Lee 2023
Clinical efficacy of soft‐tissue augmentation on tissue preservation at immediate implant sites: A randomized controlled trial
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13816
20231 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Menezes 2024
Efficacy of xenogeneic collagen matrix in the treatment of gingival recessions: a controlled clinical trial.
PMID:39536202
20241 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Puzio 2018
Ultrasound assessment of soft tissue augmentation around implants in the aesthetic zone using a connective tissue graft and xenogeneic…
DOI:10.1016/j.aanat.2017.11.003
20181 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Puzio 2018
Ultrasound assessment of soft tissue augmentation around implants in the aesthetic zone using a connective tissue graft and xenogeneic…
PMID:29248711
20181 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Rotundo 2019
Adjunctive benefit of a xenogenic collagen matrix associated with coronally advanced flap for the treatment of multiple gingival…
PMID:31292987
20191 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Sanz 2025
Bone Augmentation of Atrophic Alveolar Ridges Using a Synthetic Bone Substitute With Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Randomized, Controlled…
PMID:40844304
20251 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Shabaan 2023
Alveolar cleft reconstruction using bone marrow aspirate concentrate and iliac cancellous bone: A 12-month randomized clinical study.
PMID:37794139
20231 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Skierska 2024
Tunnel technique and subepithelial connective tissue graft, with or without cross-linked hyaluronic acid, in the treatment of multiple…
PMID:38808976
20241 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Surdiacourt 2025
A multi‐centre randomized controlled trial comparing connective tissue graft with collagen matrix to increase soft tissue thickness at the…
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13975
20241 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Tavelli 2022
Recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor improves root coverage of a collagen matrix for multiple adjacent gingival recessions: A…
PMID:35871600
20221 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Tavelli 2023
Coronally advanced flap versus tunnel technique for the treatment of peri‐implant soft tissue dehiscences with the connective tissue…
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13806
20231 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Trivedi 2024
Comparative evaluation of pinhole surgical technique with and without A-PRF in the treatment of multiple adjacent recession defects: A…
PMID:37466087
20241 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Wiesner 2010
Connective tissue grafts for thickening peri-implant tissues at implant placement. One-year results from an explanatory split-mouth…
PMID:20467596
20101 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Yilmaz 2022
Modified coronally advanced tunnel versus epithelialized free gingival graft technique in gingival phenotype modification: a comparative…
PMID:35708779
20221 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Zucchelli 2010
Patient morbidity and root coverage outcome after subepithelial connective tissue and de-epithelialized grafts: a comparative…
PMID:20590963
20101 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Abdelwahab 2023
Soft tissue esthetics around immediately provisionalized delayed implants with and without connective tissue graft: A randomized clinical…
PMID:36579756
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ahmedbeyli 2014
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ahmedbeyli 2019
Coronally advanced flap and envelope type of flap plus acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of thin phenotype multiple…
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13174
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ahmedbeyli 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ahmedbeyli 2019
Laterally positioned flap along with acellular dermal matrix graft in the management of maxillary localized recessions.
PMID:29725851
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Anderson 2014
Implant Associated Soft Tissue Defects in the Anterior Maxilla
DOI:10.1097/id.0000000000000122
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Anderson 2014
Implant associated soft tissue defects in the anterior maxilla: a randomized control trial comparing subepithelial connective tissue graft…
PMID:25033346
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Andrade 2008
Comparison between two surgical techniques for root coverage with an acellular dermal matrix graft
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2007.01193.x
2008this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Andrade 2008
Comparison between two surgical techniques for root coverage with an acellular dermal matrix graft.
PMID:18269666
2008this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Aroca 2013
Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller class I and <scp>II</scp> gingival recessions with a Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel…
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.12112
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ayub 2014
A Modified Surgical Technique for Root Coverage With an Allograft: A 12‐Month Randomized Clinical Trial
DOI:10.1902/jop.2014.140111
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ayub 2014
A modified surgical technique for root coverage with an allograft: a 12-month randomized clinical trial.
PMID:24878327
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Barootchi 2019
Long term assessment of root coverage stability using connective tissue graft with or without an epithelial collar for gingival recession…
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13187
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Barootchi 2019
Long term assessment of root coverage stability using connective tissue graft with or without an epithelial collar for gingival recession…
PMID:31446625
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bittencourt 2009
Semilunar Coronally Positioned Flap or Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Gingival Recession: A 30‐Month Follow‐Up…
DOI:10.1902/jop.2009.080498
2009this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bittencourt 2009
Semilunar coronally positioned flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: a 30-month follow-up…
PMID:19563287
2009this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bittencourt 2012
Surgical Microscope May Enhance Root Coverage With Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft: A Randomized‐Controlled Clinical Trial
DOI:10.1902/jop.2011.110202
2012this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Bittencourt 2012
Surgical microscope may enhance root coverage with subepithelial connective tissue graft: a randomized-controlled clinical trial.
PMID:21870975
2012this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Cairo 2016
Clinical efficacy of coronally advanced flap with or without connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival…
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.12590
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Cardaropoli 2012
Treatment of Gingival Recession Defects Using Coronally Advanced Flap With a Porcine Collagen Matrix Compared to Coronally Advanced Flap…
DOI:10.1902/jop.2011.110215
2012this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Cardaropoli 2012
Treatment of gingival recession defects using coronally advanced flap with a porcine collagen matrix compared to coronally advanced flap…
PMID:21721988
2012this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Cardaropoli 2014
Analysis of Buccolingual Dimensional Changes of the Extraction Socket Using the “Ice Cream Cone” Flapless Grafting Technique
DOI:10.11607/prd.1605
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Cardaropoli 2014
Coronally advanced flap with and without a xenogenic collagen matrix in the treatment of multiple recessions: a randomized controlled…
PMID:24956099
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Carrera 2023
Root coverage with platelet-rich fibrin or connective tissue graft: a split-mouth randomized trial
DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0084
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Chen 2023
Does vestibular incision improve the outcomes of vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel technique: A randomized clinical trial for…
DOI:10.1111/jerd.13051
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Clementini 2018
Biologically guided flap stability: the role of flap thickness including periosteum retention on the performance of the coronally advanced…
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.12998
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Clementini 2018
Biologically guided flap stability: the role of flap thickness including periosteum retention on the performance of the coronally advanced…
PMID:30099762
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Cosyn 2022
A multi‐centre randomized controlled trial comparing connective tissue graft with collagen matrix to increase soft tissue thickness at the…
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13691
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Cosyn 2022
A multi-centre randomized controlled trial comparing connective tissue graft with collagen matrix to increase soft tissue thickness at the…
PMID:35781692
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
D'Elia 2017
Peri-implant Soft Tissue Stability After Single Implant Restorations Using Either Guided Bone Regeneration or a Connective Tissue Graft: A…
PMID:28402353
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
De Bruyckere 2018
A randomized controlled study comparing guided bone regeneration with connective tissue graft to re‐establish convexity at the buccal…
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13006
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
De Bruyckere 2018
A randomized controlled study comparing guided bone regeneration with connective tissue graft to re-establish convexity at the buccal…
PMID:30133718
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
de Queiroz Cortes 2006
A two‐year prospective study of coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2006.00969.x
2006this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
de Queiroz Cortes 2006
A two-year prospective study of coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft.
PMID:16856894
2006this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Di Domenico 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Di Domenico 2024
Treatment of Multiple Adjacent Gingival Recessions with a Coronally Advanced Flap vs a Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel with a…
PMID:37471160
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Elena 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Franca‐Grohmann 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Franca‐Grohmann 2019
Does enamel matrix derivative application improve clinical outcomes after semilunar flap surgery? A randomized clinical trial.
PMID:29948276
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Górski 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Happe 2022
Immediate Implant Placement in Conjunction with Acellular Dermal Matrix or Connective Tissue Graft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical…
DOI:10.11607/prd.5632
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Happe 2022
Immediate Implant Placement in Conjunction with Acellular Dermal Matrix or Connective Tissue Graft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical…
PMID:35472115
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Huber 2018
Non‐interventional 1‐year follow‐up study of peri‐implant soft tissues following previous soft tissue augmentation and crown insertion in…
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.12865
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Huber 2018
Non-interventional 1-year follow-up study of peri-implant soft tissues following previous soft tissue augmentation and crown insertion in…
PMID:29290089
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jepsen 2017
Long‐Term Stability of Root Coverage by Coronally Advanced Flap Procedures
DOI:10.1902/jop.2017.160767
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Jepsen 2017
Long-Term Stability of Root Coverage by Coronally Advanced Flap Procedures.
PMID:28304210
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kassis 2024
The Effect of Connective Tissue Graft Compared to Concentrated Growth Factor Graft on Buccal Peri-Implant Gingival Thickness: A 12-month…
PMID:38432641
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Koseoglu 2013
Efficacy of Collagen Membrane Seeded With Autologous Gingival Fibroblasts in Gingival Recession Treatment: A Randomized, Controlled Pilot…
DOI:10.1902/jop.2012.120529
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Koseoglu 2013
Efficacy of collagen membrane seeded with autologous gingival fibroblasts in gingival recession treatment: a randomized, controlled pilot…
PMID:23259414
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Kuka 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lavareda Correa 2017
Use of Bone Allograft With or Without Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate in Appositional Reconstructions: A Tomographic and…
PMID:29095784
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lazzari 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Lee 2023
Clinical efficacy of soft-tissue augmentation on tissue preservation at immediate implant sites: A randomized controlled trial.
PMID:37052357
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Leknes 2005
Coronally positioned flap procedures with or without a biodegradable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession. A 6‐year…
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2005.00706.x
2005this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Leknes 2005
Coronally positioned flap procedures with or without a biodegradable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession. A 6-year…
PMID:15842269
2005this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Menezes 2024
DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0111pmc11552456
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Meza‐Mauricio 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Migliorati 2015
Clinical and Aesthetic Outcome with Post‐Extractive Implants with or without Soft Tissue Augmentation: A 2‐Year Randomized Clinical Trial
DOI:10.1111/cid.12194
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Migliorati 2015
Clinical and Aesthetic Outcome with Post-Extractive Implants with or without Soft Tissue Augmentation: A 2-Year Randomized Clinical Trial.
PMID:24373419
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Molnar 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Molnar 2022
Treatment of multiple adjacent RT 1 gingival recessions with the modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix…
PMID:35994126
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Neves 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Neves 2019
Randomized clinical trial evaluating single maxillary gingival recession treatment with connective tissue graft and tunnel or trapezoidal…
PMID:31867724
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Oh 2020
Free gingival grafts for implants exhibiting a lack of keratinized mucosa: Extended follow‐up of a randomized controlled trial
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13272
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Oh 2020
Free gingival grafts for implants exhibiting a lack of keratinized mucosa: Extended follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.
PMID:32096243
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ozenci 2015
Tunnel technique <i>versus</i> coronally advanced flap with acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.12477
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Ozenci 2015
Tunnel technique versus coronally advanced flap with acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions.
PMID:26507452
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Panwar 2022
DOI:10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.11.029pmc9485765
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Panwar 2022
Comparison of acellular dermal matrix allografts and connective tissue autografts in soft-tissue augmentation around immediate implants: A…
PMID:36147428
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Paolantonio 2002
Treatment of Gingival Recessions by Combined Periodontal Regenerative Technique, Guided Tissue Regeneration, and Subpedicle Connective…
DOI:10.1902/jop.2002.73.1.53
2002this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Paolantonio 2002
Subpedicle Acellular Dermal Matrix Graft and Autogenous Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Gingival Recessions: A Comparative…
DOI:10.1902/jop.2002.73.11.1299
2002this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Paolantonio 2002
Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective…
PMID:11846201
2002this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Paolantonio 2002
Subpedicle acellular dermal matrix graft and autogenous connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions: a comparative…
PMID:12479634
2002this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Pietruska 2019
Clinical evaluation of Miller class I and <scp>II</scp> recessions treatment with the use of modified coronally advanced tunnel technique…
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13031
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Puzio 2020
Soft tissue augmentation around dental implants with connective tissue graft (CTG) and xenogenic collagen matrix (XCM). 1-year randomized…
DOI:10.1016/j.aanat.2020.151484
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Puzio 2020
Soft tissue augmentation around dental implants with connective tissue graft (CTG) and xenogenic collagen matrix (XCM). 1-year randomized…
PMID:32205206
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rakasevic 2020
The use of collagen porcine dermal matrix and connective tissue graft with modified coronally advanced tunnel technique in the treatment…
DOI:10.1111/jerd.12624
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rebele 2014
Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft <i>versus</i> coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a…
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.12254
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rebele 2014
Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using…
PMID:24708338
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rotundo 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Santamaria 2017
2‐Year Assessment of Tissue Biostimulation With Low‐Level Laser on the Outcomes of Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Single…
DOI:10.1902/jop.2016.160391
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Santamaria 2017
2-Year Assessment of Tissue Biostimulation With Low-Level Laser on the Outcomes of Connective Tissue Graft in the Treatment of Single…
PMID:27834120
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Schulz 2023
Three-Dimensional Plotted Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds for Bone Defect Augmentation-A New Method for Regeneration.
PMID:36983646
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Skierska 2024
Tunnel technique and subepithelial connective tissue graft, with or without cross‐linked hyaluronic acid, in the treatment of multiple…
DOI:10.1002/jper.24-0093
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Stefanini 2016
Patient‐reported outcomes and aesthetic evaluation of root coverage procedures: a 12‐month follow‐up of a randomized controlled clinical…
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.12626
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Stefanini 2016
Patient-reported outcomes and aesthetic evaluation of root coverage procedures: a 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled clinical…
PMID:27717210
2016this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Surdiacourt 2025
A multi-centre randomized controlled trial comparing connective tissue graft with collagen matrix to increase soft tissue thickness at the…
PMID:38485651
2025this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tavelli 2019
Acellular dermal matrix and coronally advanced flap or tunnel technique in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions. A…
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13163
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tavelli 2019
Acellular dermal matrix and coronally advanced flap or tunnel technique in the treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions. A…
PMID:31242333
2019this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tavelli 2022
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13706pmc9796054
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Tavelli 2023
Coronally advanced flap versus tunnel technique for the treatment of peri-implant soft tissue dehiscences with the connective tissue…
PMID:36935199
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Thoma 2020
Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing implant sites augmented with a volume‐stable collagen matrix or an autogenous connective…
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13271
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Thoma 2020
Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing implant sites augmented with a volume-stable collagen matrix or an autogenous connective…
PMID:32096246
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Trivedi 2024
Comparative evaluation of pinhole surgical technique with and without<scp>A‐PRF</scp>in the treatment of multiple adjacent recession…
DOI:10.1111/jerd.13076
2023this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Uzun 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Uzun 2018
Effectiveness and predictability of titanium-prepared platelet-rich fibrin for the management of multiple gingival recessions.
PMID:28990126
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wang 2014
Comparison of Two Differently Processed Acellular Dermal Matrix Products for Root Coverage Procedures: A Prospective, Randomized…
DOI:10.1902/jop.2014.140198
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wang 2014
Comparison of two differently processed acellular dermal matrix products for root coverage procedures: a prospective, randomized…
PMID:24965060
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wang 2015
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wang 2015
Comparison of Freeze-Dried and Solvent-Dehydrated Acellular Dermal Matrix for Root Coverage: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
PMID:26509984
2015this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wiesner 2010
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yavuz 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yavuz 2024
Treatment of multiple adjacent gingival recessions using leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin with coronally advanced flap: a 12-month…
PMID:38691209
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Yilmaz 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zafiropoulos 2017
Use of Collagen Matrix for Augmentation of the Peri-implant Soft Tissue at the Time of Immediate Implant Placement
DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2052
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zafiropoulos 2017
Use of Collagen Matrix for Augmentation of the Peri-implant Soft Tissue at the Time of Immediate Implant Placement.
PMID:28512278
2017this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zucchelli 2010
Patient morbidity and root coverage outcome after subepithelial connective tissue and de‐epithelialized grafts: a comparative…
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2010.01550.x
2010this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zucchelli 2012
Root coverage in molar teeth: a comparative controlled randomized clinical trial
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.12002
2012this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zucchelli 2012
Root coverage in molar teeth: a comparative controlled randomized clinical trial.
PMID:22943446
2012this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zucchelli 2014
Does the dimension of the graft influence patient morbidity and root coverage outcomes? A randomized controlled clinical trial
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.12256
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zucchelli 2014
Coronally advanced flap + connective tissue graft techniques for the treatment of deep gingival recession in the lower incisors. A…
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.12269
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zucchelli 2014
Does the dimension of the graft influence patient morbidity and root coverage outcomes? A randomized controlled clinical trial.
PMID:24708394
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zucchelli 2014
Coronally advanced flap + connective tissue graft techniques for the treatment of deep gingival recession in the lower incisors. A…
PMID:24802283
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zuhr 2014
Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft <i>versus</i> coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a…
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.12178
2013this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zuhr 2014
Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using…
PMID:24117676
2014this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zuhr 2021
Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivate for root coverage: 5‐year results…
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13470
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zuhr 2021
Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivate for root coverage: 5-year results…
PMID:33847022
2021this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

ReviewShared studiesJaccard
Clinical stem cell therapy in oral and craniofacial bone regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2026)170.06
Esthetical and patient-reported outcomes after root coverage procedures for multiple gingival recessions: A systematic review and… (2025)150.08
Autogenous grafts versus substitute scaffolds for soft tissue augmentation in implant therapy: A systematic review. (2026)110.05
Comparative outcomes of xenogeneic collagen matrices and autogenous graft-based techniques to increase mucosal thickness and keratinised… (2026)80.04
Comparative Effectiveness of Autogenous Connective Tissue Grafts and Xenogeneic Soft Tissue Substitutes for Multiple Gingival Recessions:… (2026)60.03
Use of cells and/or biologics combined with scaffolds in alveolar bone augmentation for implant site development. (2026)60.02
Can Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improve Bone Regeneration in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2026)40.02
Therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in periodontal regeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. (2026)30.02
Cell-Based Therapies for Periodontal Regeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Future Implications for Personalized Medicine. (2026)30.02
Histological Outcomes of Root Coverage Procedures: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. (2026)10.00
Clinical efficacy of different biomaterials for the regenerative treatment of periodontal intrabony defects: a systematic review and… (2026)10.00
Is There a Difference in Postoperative Pain After Harvesting a Palatal Soft Tissue Graft Aiming for Primary Versus Secondary Intention… (2026)10.01

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationHuman adults with at least one natural tooth or dental implant with a soft or hard tissue defect requiring augmentationAdults with gingival thickness deficiency at teeth (54 RCTs, 2952 teeth) and mucosal thickness deficiency at implants (24 RCTs, 851 implants)
InterventionProfessionally administered emerging technologies and personalized strategies for regeneration of periodontal or peri-implant soft or hard tissueBilaminar soft tissue grafting: CTG, hADM, pADM, CMX, VCMX; qualitative review of stem cell, 3D-printed scaffold, secretome and AI approaches for bone
ComparisonAll suitable comparisons among included interventions; flap therapy alone or no augmentation as control for soft tissueFlap therapy alone or no soft tissue augmentation; CTG as reference
OutcomesBuccal soft tissue thickness (GT around teeth, MT around implants) as primary; pain, satisfaction, quality of life, treatment timeGingival thickness (teeth); mucosal thickness (implants); association with recession, PI, PD, BOP
Study designsProspective controlled RCTs (min 10 patients) for the soft tissue NMA; any prospective interventional human study for hard tissue78 RCTs in the NMA; non-randomized prospective studies and case reports in the qualitative bone section
TimingAt least 12 months follow-up for teeth and 6 months for implants (soft tissue)6 to 144 months for teeth (data beyond 72 months not analyzed); 6 to 48 months for implants

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedYesNono
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalYesYesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalYesYesyes
8Included studies described in detailYesYesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: NoRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/Ano
10Funding of included studies reportedYesYesyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: N/ARCT: Yes · NRSI: N/Ayes
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoYesno
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedNoYesno
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowLowno