evidencegaps
Primary study · included by 3 reviews

Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus connective tissue graft for buccal soft tissue augmentation at implant site. A randomized, controlled clinical trial

CairoF 2017 · Cairo Francesco, Barbato Luigi, Tonelli Paolo, et al. · Journal of Clinical Periodontology · 2017

Included by

Comparative outcomes of xenogeneic collagen matrices and autogenous graft-based techniques to increase mucosal thickness and keratinised mucosa width at implant sites: are autologous grafts still the gold standard? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Cairo 2017 · Results, Study selection; Figures 2-4 and 6; reference list
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Increase in buccal mucosal thickness (MT), mm
Non-crosslinked xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM*) with bilaminar technique vs Subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG) with bilaminar technique · 3 months
MD 0.27 [0.05, 0.49]5 studies · 152 participantsGRADE not reported
Increase in buccal mucosal thickness (MT), mm
Xenogeneic collagen matrices (XCM*, non-crosslinked, and VCMX, crosslinked) with bilaminar technique vs Subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG) with bilaminar technique · 3 months
MD 0.27 [0.12, 0.42]9 studies · 294 participantsGRADE not reported
Emerging, personalized, and minimally invasive technologies for periodontal and peri-implant soft and hard tissue regenerative therapy.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Cairo 2017 · Table 2 (reference 112)

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

Autogenous grafts versus substitute scaffolds for soft tissue augmentation in implant therapy: A systematic review.
Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Cairo 2017 · References 32

The review does not say which of its outcomes this study informs.

3 including reviews in total.