Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42266854

Comparative effectiveness of various intubation fixation devices for patients undergoing tracheal intubation in the ICU: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Huang Zexi, Cui Nianqi, Zheng Yanmin, et al. · International journal of nursing sciences · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2025.12.009

Findings

Population Adults (18 years or older) undergoing orotracheal intubation in the ICU

66 findings

Tracheal intubation fixatorDental pad fixationCatheter displacement
Intensive care units · Node-splitting indirect estimate (Suppl. Table S4)
OR 0.26
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Tracheal intubation fixator (commercial endotracheal tube holder)Dental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage)Pain (VAS, any pain vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, direct estimate
OR 0.05
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Tracheal intubation fixator (commercial endotracheal tube holder)Dental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage)Pain (VAS, any pain vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Direct paired random-effects meta-analysis versus dental pad fixation
OR 3.86 [1.22, 12.28]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 362 participants
Tracheal intubation fixatorDental pad fixationCatheter displacement
Intensive care units · Node-splitting direct estimate (Suppl. Table S4)
OR 0.20
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Tracheal intubation fixatorDental pad fixationPain (VAS, any pain vs none)
Intensive care units · Node-splitting indirect estimate (Suppl. Table S6)
OR 0.02
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Tracheal intubation fixatorDental pad fixationFacial pressure injury
Intensive care units · Node-splitting indirect estimate (Suppl. Table S5)
OR 0.02
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Tracheal intubation fixatorDental pad fixationCatheter displacement
Intensive care units · Node-splitting network estimate (Suppl. Table S4)
OR 0.22
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Tracheal intubation fixator (commercial endotracheal tube holder)Dental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage)Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Direct paired random-effects meta-analysis versus dental pad fixation
OR 10.58 [2.22, 50.37]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 362 participants
Tracheal intubation fixatorDental pad fixationFacial pressure injury
Intensive care units · Node-splitting direct estimate (Suppl. Table S5)
OR 0.05
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Tracheal intubation fixatorDental pad fixationPain (VAS, any pain vs none)
Intensive care units · Node-splitting network estimate (Suppl. Table S6)
OR 0.04
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Tracheal intubation fixator (commercial endotracheal tube holder)Dental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage)Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, network estimate
OR 0.04
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Tracheal intubation fixator (commercial endotracheal tube holder)Dental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage)Catheter displacement (any displacement vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Direct paired random-effects meta-analysis versus dental pad fixation
OR 3.92 [0.73, 20.94]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 362 participants
Adhesive tape fixationDental pad fixationPain (VAS, any pain vs none)
Intensive care units · Node-splitting network estimate (Suppl. Table S6)
OR 7.90
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adhesive tape fixationDental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage)Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, network estimate
OR 2.00
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adhesive tape fixationDental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage)Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Direct paired random-effects meta-analysis versus dental pad fixation
OR 5.08 [1.06, 24.26]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 215 participants
Adhesive tape fixationDental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage)Pain (VAS, any pain vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Direct paired random-effects meta-analysis versus dental pad fixation
OR 3.20 [0.72, 14.28]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 107 participants
Adhesive tape fixationDental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage)Catheter displacement (any displacement vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Direct paired random-effects meta-analysis versus dental pad fixation
OR 2.31 [0.39, 13.55]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 107 participants
Adhesive tape fixationDental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage)Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, indirect estimate
OR 1.60
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adhesive tape fixationDental pad fixationFacial pressure injury
Intensive care units · Node-splitting direct estimate (Suppl. Table S5)
OR 2.80
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adhesive tape fixationDental pad fixationCatheter displacement
Intensive care units · Node-splitting direct estimate (Suppl. Table S4)
OR 2.90
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adhesive tape fixationDental pad fixationPain (VAS, any pain vs none)
Intensive care units · Node-splitting indirect estimate (Suppl. Table S6)
OR 1.80
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adhesive tape fixationDental pad fixationCatheter displacement
Intensive care units · Node-splitting indirect estimate (Suppl. Table S4)
OR 1.60
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adhesive tape fixationDental pad fixationPain (VAS, any pain vs none)
Intensive care units · Node-splitting direct estimate (Suppl. Table S6)
OR 50.00
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adhesive tape fixationDental pad fixationCatheter displacement
Intensive care units · Node-splitting network estimate (Suppl. Table S4)
OR 2.00
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Bandage fixation (non-adhesive nylon or cotton strap)Dental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage)Pain (VAS, any pain vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Direct paired random-effects meta-analysis versus dental pad fixation
OR 1.88 [0.28, 12.42]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 80 participants
Bandage fixationDental pad fixationPain (VAS, any pain vs none)
Intensive care units · Node-splitting indirect estimate (Suppl. Table S6)
OR 2.30
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Bandage fixationDental pad fixationCatheter displacement
Intensive care units · Node-splitting indirect estimate (Suppl. Table S4)
OR 8.90
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Bandage fixationDental pad fixationCatheter displacement
Intensive care units · Node-splitting network estimate (Suppl. Table S4)
OR 5.40
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Bandage fixationDental pad fixationFacial pressure injury
Intensive care units · Node-splitting indirect estimate (Suppl. Table S5)
OR 9.10
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Bandage fixation (non-adhesive nylon or cotton strap)Dental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage)Pain (VAS, any pain vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, network estimate
OR 74.0
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Bandage fixationDental pad fixationPain (VAS, any pain vs none)
Intensive care units · Node-splitting direct estimate (Suppl. Table S6)
OR 11.00
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Bandage fixation (non-adhesive nylon or cotton strap)Dental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage)Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, direct estimate
OR 4.00
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Bandage fixation (non-adhesive nylon or cotton strap)Dental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage)Catheter displacement (any displacement vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, direct estimate
OR 4.00
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Bandage fixation (non-adhesive nylon or cotton strap)Dental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage)Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, network estimate
OR 5.40
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Bandage fixation (non-adhesive nylon or cotton strap)Dental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage)Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Direct paired random-effects meta-analysis versus dental pad fixation
OR 12.33 [2.13, 71.22]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 80 participants
Bandage fixation (non-adhesive nylon or cotton strap)Dental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage)Catheter displacement (any displacement vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Direct paired random-effects meta-analysis versus dental pad fixation
OR 4.30 [0.76, 24.35]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 188 participants
Hybrid fixation (adhesive tapes and straps)Dental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage)Pain (VAS, any pain vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Direct paired random-effects meta-analysis versus dental pad fixation
OR 16.27 [3.56, 74.30]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 138 participants
Hybrid fixation (adhesive tapes and straps)Dental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage)Catheter displacement (any displacement vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Direct paired random-effects meta-analysis versus dental pad fixation
OR 0.93 [0.04, 20.17]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 62 participants
Hybrid fixation (adhesive tapes and straps)Dental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage)Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Direct paired random-effects meta-analysis versus dental pad fixation
OR 9.67 [0.35, 264.31]
GRADE not reported
1 study · 62 participants
Adhesive tape fixationTracheal intubation fixator (commercial endotracheal tube holder)Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, network estimate
OR 0.45
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adhesive tape fixationTracheal intubation fixator (commercial endotracheal tube holder)Catheter displacement (any displacement vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, indirect estimate
OR 0.06
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adhesive tape fixationTracheal intubation fixatorCatheter displacement
Intensive care units · Node-splitting direct estimate (Suppl. Table S4)
OR 1.70
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adhesive tape fixationTracheal intubation fixator (commercial endotracheal tube holder)Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, indirect estimate
OR 0.06
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adhesive tape fixationTracheal intubation fixator (commercial endotracheal tube holder)Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, direct estimate
OR 1.70
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adhesive tape fixationTracheal intubation fixatorCatheter displacement
Intensive care units · Node-splitting network estimate (Suppl. Table S4)
OR 0.45
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adhesive tape fixationTracheal intubation fixator (commercial endotracheal tube holder)Pain (VAS, any pain vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, direct estimate
OR 1.20
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adhesive tape fixationTracheal intubation fixatorPain (VAS, any pain vs none)
Intensive care units · Node-splitting network estimate (Suppl. Table S6)
OR 0.31
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Adhesive tape fixationTracheal intubation fixatorPain (VAS, any pain vs none)
Intensive care units · Node-splitting indirect estimate (Suppl. Table S6)
OR 0.07
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Bandage fixationAdhesive tape fixationCatheter displacement
Intensive care units · Node-splitting network estimate (Suppl. Table S4)
OR 2.70
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Bandage fixation (non-adhesive nylon or cotton strap)Adhesive tape fixationPain (VAS, any pain vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, network estimate
OR 9.10
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Bandage fixation (non-adhesive nylon or cotton strap)Adhesive tape fixationFacial pressure injury (any injury vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, direct estimate
OR 22.00
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Bandage fixationAdhesive tape fixationCatheter displacement
Intensive care units · Node-splitting indirect estimate (Suppl. Table S4)
OR 0.29
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Bandage fixation (non-adhesive nylon or cotton strap)Adhesive tape fixationCatheter displacement (any displacement vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, direct estimate
OR 22.0
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Bandage fixation (non-adhesive nylon or cotton strap)Adhesive tape fixationPain (VAS, any pain vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, direct estimate
OR 66.00
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Bandage fixation (non-adhesive nylon or cotton strap)Adhesive tape fixationFacial pressure injury (any injury vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, network estimate
OR 2.70
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Bandage fixation (non-adhesive nylon or cotton strap)Adhesive tape fixationFacial pressure injury (any injury vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, indirect estimate
OR 0.29
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Bandage fixation (non-adhesive nylon or cotton strap)Adhesive tape fixationPain (VAS, any pain vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, indirect estimate
OR 0.34
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Tracheal intubation fixatorBandage fixationFacial pressure injury
Intensive care units · Node-splitting direct estimate (Suppl. Table S5)
OR 0.05
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Tracheal intubation fixatorBandage fixationFacial pressure injury
Intensive care units · Node-splitting indirect estimate (Suppl. Table S5)
OR 4.60
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Tracheal intubation fixatorBandage fixationCatheter displacement
Intensive care units · Node-splitting direct estimate (Suppl. Table S4)
OR 0.05
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Tracheal intubation fixator (commercial endotracheal tube holder)Bandage fixation (non-adhesive nylon or cotton strap)Pain (VAS, any pain vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, indirect estimate
OR 19.0
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Tracheal intubation fixator (commercial endotracheal tube holder)Bandage fixation (non-adhesive nylon or cotton strap)Pain (VAS, any pain vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, direct estimate
OR 0.49
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Tracheal intubation fixatorBandage fixationCatheter displacement
Intensive care units · Node-splitting network estimate (Suppl. Table S4)
OR 1.20
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Tracheal intubation fixator (commercial endotracheal tube holder)Bandage fixation (non-adhesive nylon or cotton strap)Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, network estimate
OR 1.20
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Tracheal intubation fixator (commercial endotracheal tube holder)Bandage fixation (non-adhesive nylon or cotton strap)Catheter displacement (any displacement vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, indirect estimate
OR 4.70
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported
Tracheal intubation fixator (commercial endotracheal tube holder)Bandage fixation (non-adhesive nylon or cotton strap)Pain (VAS, any pain vs none)
During ICU orotracheal intubation · Node-splitting analysis, network estimate
OR 2.80
GRADE not reported
Studies not reported

Included primary studies 17

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Chen 2016
matched by author and year (probable)
NR3 other reviewsCatheter displacement (any displacement vs none); Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none)not extracted yet
Bahadori 2022
Durapore vs. Hy-Tape for securing endotracheal tubes during general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.
PMID:36345922
2022this review onlyFacial pressure injury (any injury vs none)not extracted yet
Chen 2016
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-8283.2016.10.008
NRthis review onlyCatheter displacement (any displacement vs none); Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none)not extracted yet
Chen 2017
[Evaluation of the effect of a new fixation tape for tracheal catheter in intensive care patients].
PMID:28936962
2017this review onlyCatheter displacement (any displacement vs none); Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none); Pain (VAS, any pain vs none)not extracted yet
Genc 2022
The impact of two distinct endotracheal tube fixation on the formation of pressure ulcer in the intensive care unit: A randomised…
PMID:35088531
2022this review onlyFacial pressure injury (any injury vs none)not extracted yet
Hu 2009
DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2009.02.021
NRthis review onlyPain (VAS, any pain vs none)not extracted yet
Landsperger 2019
The effect of adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube fastener in critically ill adults: the endotracheal tube securement (ETTS) randomized…
PMID:31064406
2019this review onlyCatheter displacement; Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none)not extracted yet
Ma 2014
DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2014.19.017
NRthis review onlyCatheter displacement (any displacement vs none)not extracted yet
Miu 2016
DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2016.24.031
NRthis review onlyFacial pressure injurynot extracted yet
Niu 2023
Clinical application and evaluation of a new type of tracheal catheter fixation belt.
PMID:36480230
2023this review onlyCatheter displacement (any displacement vs none)not extracted yet
Qian 2022
Design and Clinical Application Effect Analysis of a New Type of Oral Fluid Suction Device for Patients with Orotracheal Intubation.
PMID:35935331
2022this review onlyCatheter displacement (any displacement vs none); Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none); Pain (VAS, any pain vs none)not extracted yet
Wang 2013
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2013.13.067
NRthis review onlyCatheter displacement (any displacement vs none); Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none); Pain (VAS, any pain vs none)not extracted yet
Wang 2013
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyCatheter displacement (any displacement vs none); Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none); Pain (VAS, any pain vs none)not extracted yet
Xie 2017
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2017.07.049
NRthis review onlyCatheter displacement; Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none); Pain (VAS, any pain vs none)not extracted yet
Xie 2017
Auditory exposure of high-risk infants discharged from the NICU and the impact of social factors.
PMID:32017237
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Zeng 2016
Comparison of Medical Adhesive Tapes in Patients at Risk of Facial Skin Trauma under Anesthesia.
PMID:27382368
2016this review onlyFacial pressure injury (any injury vs none)not extracted yet
Zhu 2020
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2020.14.055
NRthis review onlyCatheter displacement; Facial pressure injury; Pain (VAS, any pain vs none)not extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdults (18 years or older) undergoing orotracheal intubation in the ICU; no neck or facial trauma, oral diseases or skin allergy historyAdult ICU patients with orotracheal intubation, 1,876 participants in 16 RCTs (n=16)
InterventionTracheal intubation fixators, bandage fixation, adhesive tape fixation, dental pad fixation, hybrid fixationTracheal intubation fixator (n=6), dental pad (n=8), adhesive tape (n=8), bandage (n=8), hybrid fixation (n=3)
ComparisonOne of the other four fixation devices; dental pad fixation designated as the reference (traditional) methodDental pad fixation as network reference; other devices compared against each other
OutcomesCatheter displacement, facial pressure injury, pain (VAS)Catheter displacement (n=11 RCTs), facial pressure injury (n=13), pain (n=8)
Study designsRCTs published in Chinese or English16 RCTs (15 two-arm, 1 three-arm); 75% conducted in China
TimingNot specifiedIntervention duration 4 to 27 months

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedYesNono
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateNoNoyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalNoNoyes
8Included studies described in detailYesYesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: YesNRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: YesNRSI: N/A · RCT: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsYesYesyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalNoNoyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalYesYesyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes