Primary study · included by 1 review

Xie 2017

Included by

Comparative effectiveness of various intubation fixation devices for patients undergoing tracheal intubation in the ICU: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Non-Cochrane · intervention · 2026 · cited as Xie 2017 · Supplementary Table S3; reference list

Outcome this study informs	Pooled effect	Evidence	Certainty
Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none) Adhesive tape fixation vs Tracheal intubation fixator (commercial endotracheal tube holder) · During ICU orotracheal intubation	OR 0.45	NR	GRADE not reported
Catheter displacement Adhesive tape fixation vs Tracheal intubation fixator	OR 1.70	NR	GRADE not reported
Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none) Adhesive tape fixation vs Tracheal intubation fixator (commercial endotracheal tube holder) · During ICU orotracheal intubation	OR 1.70	NR	GRADE not reported
Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none) Adhesive tape fixation vs Tracheal intubation fixator (commercial endotracheal tube holder) · During ICU orotracheal intubation	OR 0.06	NR	GRADE not reported
Catheter displacement (any displacement vs none) Adhesive tape fixation vs Tracheal intubation fixator (commercial endotracheal tube holder) · During ICU orotracheal intubation	OR 0.06	NR	GRADE not reported
Catheter displacement Adhesive tape fixation vs Tracheal intubation fixator	OR 0.45	NR	GRADE not reported
Pain (VAS, any pain vs none) Adhesive tape fixation vs Tracheal intubation fixator (commercial endotracheal tube holder) · During ICU orotracheal intubation	OR 1.20	NR	GRADE not reported
Pain (VAS, any pain vs none) Adhesive tape fixation vs Tracheal intubation fixator	OR 0.31	NR	GRADE not reported
Pain (VAS, any pain vs none) Adhesive tape fixation vs Tracheal intubation fixator	OR 0.07	NR	GRADE not reported

1 including review in total.