Primary study · included by 1 review

Zhu 2020

Included by

Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Pain (VAS, any pain vs none)
Adhesive tape fixation vs Dental pad fixation
OR 7.90NRGRADE not reported
Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none)
Adhesive tape fixation vs Dental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage) · During ICU orotracheal intubation
OR 2.00NRGRADE not reported
Facial pressure injury
Adhesive tape fixation vs Dental pad fixation
OR 2.80NRGRADE not reported
Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none)
Adhesive tape fixation vs Dental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage) · During ICU orotracheal intubation
OR 5.08 [1.06, 24.26]2 studies · 215 participantsGRADE not reported
Pain (VAS, any pain vs none)
Adhesive tape fixation vs Dental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage) · During ICU orotracheal intubation
OR 3.20 [0.72, 14.28]1 study · 107 participantsGRADE not reported
Catheter displacement (any displacement vs none)
Adhesive tape fixation vs Dental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage) · During ICU orotracheal intubation
OR 2.31 [0.39, 13.55]1 study · 107 participantsGRADE not reported
Facial pressure injury (any injury vs none)
Adhesive tape fixation vs Dental pad fixation (bite block secured with tape or bandage) · During ICU orotracheal intubation
OR 1.60NRGRADE not reported
Catheter displacement
Adhesive tape fixation vs Dental pad fixation
OR 2.90NRGRADE not reported
Pain (VAS, any pain vs none)
Adhesive tape fixation vs Dental pad fixation
OR 1.80NRGRADE not reported
Catheter displacement
Adhesive tape fixation vs Dental pad fixation
OR 1.60NRGRADE not reported
Pain (VAS, any pain vs none)
Adhesive tape fixation vs Dental pad fixation
OR 50.00NRGRADE not reported
Catheter displacement
Adhesive tape fixation vs Dental pad fixation
OR 2.00NRGRADE not reported

1 including review in total.