Question · asked by 1 review

Secondary (passive/secondhand) smoking exposure during childhood vs No secondary smoking exposure: Caries prevalence (early childhood caries)

Population
Preschool children aged <=71 months (caries outcome assessed at 3-6 years)
Intervention
Secondary (passive/secondhand) smoking exposure during childhood
Comparison
No secondary smoking exposure
Outcome
Caries prevalence (early childhood caries)

Preschool children exposed to secondary smoking have higher odds of caries prevalence (OR 1.77), but the cross-sectional evidence is very uncertain (very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Secondary (passive/secondhand) smoking exposure during childhood vs No secondary smoking exposure
Caries prevalence (early childhood caries) · Preschool children aged <=71 months (caries outcome assessed at 3-6 years) · Caries prevalence at 3-6 years, Population/community; dental examination (no restriction); mostly Asia, Overall
Preschool children exposed to secondary smoking have higher odds of caries prevalence (OR 1.77), but the cross-sectional evidence is very uncertain (very low certainty).
Secondary Smoking and Early Childhood Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2025) All outcomes
OR 1.77 [1.57, 2.01]11 studies · 14,794 participantsVery low
Secondary (passive/secondhand) smoking exposure during childhood vs No secondary smoking exposure
Caries prevalence (early childhood caries) · Preschool children aged <=71 months (caries outcome assessed at 3-6 years) · Caries prevalence at 4-6 years, Age- and gender-matched case-control (Turkey, Iraq), Overall
Children exposed to secondary smoking may have higher odds of caries prevalence (OR 4.46; low certainty) based on two case-control studies.
Secondary Smoking and Early Childhood Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2025) All outcomes
OR 4.46 [2.08, 9.55]2 studies · 240 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Secondary Smoking and Early Childhood Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
2025 All outcomes
20 June 202416Not applicable

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.