Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM42475394

Adverse effects of removable orthodontic aligners: A systematic review with single-arm meta-analysis.

Ronchi Lemos Cintia, Aguilar Ventura Fadel Marianella, Polmann Helena, et al. · PloS one · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0350741

Findings

11 findings

Population
Orthodontic patients treated with removable clear alignersRemovable (clear) orthodontic aligners (aligner arm only)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Apical root resorption (linear, mm)
18 months · Overall
Mean change -0.69 [-0.96, -0.41]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 89 participants
Orthodontic patients treated with removable clear alignersRemovable (clear) orthodontic aligners (aligner arm only)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Apical root resorption (linear, mm)
6 months · Overall
Mean change -0.20 [-0.45, 0.05]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias
3 studies · 125 participants
Orthodontic patients treated with removable clear alignersRemovable (clear) orthodontic aligners (aligner arm only)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Plaque Index change (Silness-Loe 0-3)
3 months · Conservative imputation of SD (primary)
Mean change 0.23 [-0.49, 0.95]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
3 studies · 87 participants
Orthodontic patients treated with removable clear alignersRemovable (clear) orthodontic aligners (aligner arm only)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Apical root resorption (linear, mm)
Baseline to 18 months · Subgroup by follow-up: baseline to 18 months
Mean change -0.31 [-0.53, -0.08]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 89 participants
Orthodontic patients of any age or sex treated with removable clear alignersRemovable clear aligner therapy (aligner arms only)None (single-arm synthesis of aligner groups)Pain/discomfort after aligner placement (VAS 0 to 10)
3 days · Clinical orthodontic settings, 15 countries
MEAN 1.55 [1.09, 2.21]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
7 studies · 259 participants
Orthodontic patients treated with removable clear alignersRemovable (clear) orthodontic aligners (aligner arm only)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Plaque Index change (Silness-Loe 0-3)
3 months · Optimistic imputation of SD (sensitivity)
Mean change 0.23 [-0.49, 0.94]
GRADE not reported
3 studies · 87 participants
Orthodontic patients of any age or sex treated with removable clear alignersRemovable clear aligner therapy (aligner arms only)None (single-arm synthesis of aligner groups)Pain/discomfort after aligner placement (VAS 0 to 10)
1 week · Clinical orthodontic settings, 15 countries
MEAN 1.08 [0.33, 3.51]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
6 studies · 229 participants
Orthodontic patients of any age or sex treated with removable clear alignersRemovable clear aligner therapy (aligner arms only)None (single-arm synthesis of aligner groups)Pain/discomfort after aligner placement (VAS 0 to 10)
24 hours · Clinical orthodontic settings, 15 countries
MEAN 3.06 [2.15, 4.37]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
10 studies · 418 participants
Orthodontic patients treated with removable clear alignersRemovable (clear) orthodontic aligners (aligner arm only)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Apical root resorption (volumetric, mm3)
End of follow-up · Overall
Mean change -4.37 [-5.51, -3.24]
Moderate
Downgraded: risk of bias
3 studies · 47 participants
Orthodontic patients treated with removable clear alignersRemovable (clear) orthodontic aligners (aligner arm only)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Apical root resorption (linear, mm)
Baseline to 6 months · Subgroup by follow-up: baseline to 6 months
Mean change -0.06 [-0.35, 0.22]
GRADE not reported
2 studies · 47 participants
Orthodontic patients treated with removable clear alignersRemovable (clear) orthodontic aligners (aligner arm only)None (single-arm meta-analysis)Apical root resorption (linear, mm)
End of treatment (follow-up 6 to 26 months) · Overall (all follow-up subgroups)
Mean change -0.33 [-0.55, -0.11]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
6 studies · 216 participants

Included primary studies 31

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Wang 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NR2 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Alam 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Levrini 2013
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewApical root resorption (volumetric, mm3)not extracted yet
Withayanukonkij 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewPlaque Index change (Silness-Loe 0-3); Apical root resorption (linear, mm)not extracted yet
Yang 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Zhang 2025
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Zhao 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewPain/discomfort after aligner placement (VAS 0 to 10)not extracted yet
Al-Dboush 2022
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyApical root resorption (linear, mm)not extracted yet
Albhaisi 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Alcón 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPain/discomfort after aligner placement (VAS 0 to 10)not extracted yet
Almagrami 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPlaque Index change (Silness-Loe 0-3)not extracted yet
Almasoud 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPain/discomfort after aligner placement (VAS 0 to 10)not extracted yet
Altkuri 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPain/discomfort after aligner placement (VAS 0 to 10)not extracted yet
Antonio-Zancajo 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Buschang 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Çetin and Akdeniz 2025
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Damasceno Melo 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Diddige 2019
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPain/discomfort after aligner placement (VAS 0 to 10)not extracted yet
Eissa 2018
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPlaque Index change (Silness-Loe 0-3); Apical root resorption (linear, mm)not extracted yet
Fraundorf and Kim 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Fujiyama 2014
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPain/discomfort after aligner placement (VAS 0 to 10)not extracted yet
Khalil 2023
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyApical root resorption (linear, mm)not extracted yet
Liu & Song 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Mahayyudin 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPlaque Index change (Silness-Loe 0-3); Apical root resorption (linear, mm)not extracted yet
Mertoglu 2025
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPlaque Index change (Silness-Loe 0-3); Apical root resorption (linear, mm); Apical root resorption (volumetric, mm3)not extracted yet
Pereira 2020
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Rossi 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyApical root resorption (linear, mm)not extracted yet
Rucker 2012
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPain/discomfort after aligner placement (VAS 0 to 10)not extracted yet
Schaefer 2010
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Selvakumar 2024
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyApical root resorption (volumetric, mm3)not extracted yet
White 2017
matched by author and year (probable)
NRthis review onlyPain/discomfort after aligner placement (VAS 0 to 10)not extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationOrthodontic patients of any age or sexOrthodontic patients wearing clear aligners (n=1,636; mean age 13.9 to 45 years)
InterventionRemovable clear alignersRemovable clear aligners
ComparisonNone (aligner arms only)None (single-arm)
OutcomesAdverse effects during or after aligner treatmentPain/discomfort, apical root resorption, plaque (pooled); periodontal status, enamel demineralization, white spot lesions, speech, halitosis, open gingival embrasures, TMD, awake bruxism, caries, chewing performance (narrative)
Study designsCohort studies and clinical trials, randomized or not34 studies (10 RCTs, 6 non-randomized clinical studies, 18 cohort studies)
TimingNot specifiedPain at 24 hours, 3 days, 1 week; plaque at 3 months; root resorption at 6 months, 18 months and end of treatment

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesNono
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalYesYesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalYesYesyes
8Included studies described in detailYesYesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: YesNRSI: Yes · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedYesYesyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: Partial YesNRSI: Yes · RCT: Yesno
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallLowLowyes