Non-Cochrane · intervention · PM41847626

Evaluation of Pain and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Associated With Fixed Orthodontic Treatment in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Rasol Omar A, Hajeer Mohammad Y, Burhan Ahmad S, et al. · Cureus · 2026 · PubMed · doi:10.7759/cureus.105336

Findings

Population Adults (18 years or older) treated with conventional fixed orthodontic appliances

2 findings

Conventional fixed orthodontic appliance treatmentPain at day 1 versus week 1 after appliance placementPain intensity (VAS 0-100 mm)
Day 1 versus week 1 · Not specified
MD 20.83 [11.7, 29.97]
Very low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
2 studies · 56 participants
Conventional fixed orthodontic appliance treatmentOHRQoL at week 1 versus month 1 after appliance placementOral health-related quality of life (OHIP-14; higher score = worse)
Week 1 versus month 1 · Not specified
MD 9.5 [7.5, 11.5]
Low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
2 studies · 40 participants

Included primary studies 23

Open in Studies
StudyYearAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial data
Alfawal 2024
The impact of non-extraction orthodontic treatment on oral health-related quality of life: clear aligners versus fixed appliances-a…
PMID:35395075
20223 other reviewsOral health-related quality of life (OHIP-14; higher score = worse)not extracted yet
Alhafi 2024
The Impact of Non-Extraction Orthodontic Treatment on the Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life between a Modified Aligner Appliance with…
PMID:39064568
20242 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Antonio-Zancajo 2020
Pain and Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life in Orthodontic Patients During Initial Therapy with Conventional, Low-Friction, and Lingual…
PMID:32635196
20202 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Gao 2021
Comparison of pain perception, anxiety, and impacts on oral health-related quality of life between patients receiving clear aligners and…
PMID:32613250
20212 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Miller 2007
A comparison of treatment impacts between Invisalign aligner and fixed appliance therapy during the first week of treatment.
PMID:17346581
20072 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Tunca 2024
Comparison of anxiety, pain, and quality of life in individuals with mild or moderate malocclusion between conventional fixed orthodontic…
PMID:38760747
20242 other reviewsnot statednot extracted yet
Alcon 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
NR1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Diddige 2020
Comparison of pain levels in patients treated with 3 different orthodontic appliances - a randomized trial.
PMID:32133451
20201 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Jaber 2022
The Effect of Treatment With Clear Aligners Versus Fixed Appliances on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Severe…
PMID:35663697
20221 other reviewOral health-related quality of life (OHIP-14; higher score = worse)not extracted yet
Johal 2018
Pain experience in adults undergoing treatment: A longitudinal evaluation.
PMID:29509026
20181 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Wu 2010
A comparison of pain experienced by patients treated with labial and lingual orthodontic appliances.
PMID:20018798
20101 other reviewnot statednot extracted yet
Alcon 2021
[Injected nitroglycerin to follow extracorporeal circulation].
PMID:122021
1979this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Alfawal 2022
The impact of non-extraction orthodontic treatment on oral health-related quality of life: clear aligners versus fixed appliances—a…
DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjac012
2022this review onlyOral health-related quality of life (OHIP-14; higher score = worse)not extracted yet
Curto 2020
Influence of a Lubricating Gel (Orthospeed®) on Pain and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Orthodontic Patients during Initial…
PMID:32423007
2020this review onlyPain intensity (VAS 0-100 mm)not extracted yet
Curto 2022
Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life and Anxiety in Orthodontic Patients with Conventional Brackets
DOI:10.3390/ijerph191710767
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Curto 2022
Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life and Anxiety in Orthodontic Patients with Conventional Brackets.
PMID:36078481
2022this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Diddige 2020
Comparison of pain levels in patients treated with 3 different orthodontic appliances - a randomized trial
DOI:10.15386/mpr-1311
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Gao 2021
Comparison of pain perception, anxiety, and impacts on oral health-related quality of life between patients receiving clear aligners and…
DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjaa037
2020this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Johal 2018
Pain experience in adults undergoing treatment: A longitudinal evaluation
DOI:10.2319/082317-570.1
2018this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Miller 2007
A comparison of treatment impacts between Invisalign aligner and fixed appliance therapy during the first week of treatment
DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.05.031
2007this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Sirri 2022
Evaluation of Perceived Pain, Discomfort, Functional Impairments, and Satisfaction When Relieving Crowded Lower Anterior Teeth in Young…
PMID:35815305
2022this review onlyPain intensity (VAS 0-100 mm)not extracted yet
Tunca 2024
Comparison of anxiety, pain, and quality of life in individuals with mild or moderate malocclusion between conventional fixed orthodontic…
DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-04335-1
2024this review onlynot statednot extracted yet
Wu 2010
A comparison of pain experienced by patients treated with labial and lingual orthodontic appliances
DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjp117
2009this review onlynot statednot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match). Only the non-Cochrane dental reviews have study lists, so overlap with Cochrane reviews is not counted yet.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationAdult patients aged 18 years or older treated with a conventional fixed metallic applianceAdults, mean age 18.87 to 38 years, about 61% female (n=1,022 patients across 14 studies; n=396 with conventional fixed appliances)
InterventionConventional fixed orthodontic applianceConventional fixed appliance treatment (n=396)
ComparisonNo direct comparison targeted; studies comparing fixed appliances with other orthodontic appliances included if they reported relevant outcomesClear aligners; lingual fixed appliances; low-friction brackets; self-ligating brackets; corticision; Orthospeed gel; modified aligner appliance; or none (two studies of fixed appliances alone)
OutcomesPrimary: patient-reported pain; secondary: oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL)Pain on VAS (9 studies); OHRQoL on OHIP-14 (8 studies) or GOHAI (1 study)
Study designsObservational studies (cross-sectional, cohort) primarily; RCTs and controlled clinical trials also included7 RCTs, 3 CCTs, 3 cohort studies, 1 cross-sectional study (n=14)
TimingOne day, one week, two weeks, one month and three monthsPain: 4 h to 12 months; OHRQoL: 1 day to 12 months or end of treatment

AMSTAR 2 items

Two independent extractors rated each item. Their ratings are shown side by side because they have not been reconciled yet. The overall rating follows Shea et al. 2017: one critical flaw gives Low, more than one gives Critically Low.

ItemExtractor AExtractor BAgree
1Research question includes PICO componentsYesYesyes
2Protocol established before the reviewcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
3Choice of study designs explainedNoNoyes
4Comprehensive literature searchcriticalPartial YesPartial Yesyes
5Study selection in duplicateYesYesyes
6Data extraction in duplicateYesYesyes
7List of excluded studies with reasonscriticalYesYesyes
8Included studies described in detailPartial YesPartial Yesyes
9Risk of bias assessed satisfactorilycriticalRCT: Yes · NRSI: YesNRSI: Yes · RCT: Yesno
10Funding of included studies reportedNoNoyes
11Appropriate meta-analysis methodscriticalRCT: No · NRSI: N/ANRSI: N/A · RCT: Nono
12Impact of risk of bias on the pooled resultsNoNoyes
13Risk of bias accounted for in interpretationcriticalYesYesyes
14Heterogeneity explainedYesYesyes
15Publication bias investigatedcriticalNoNoyes
16Conflicts of interest reportedYesYesyes
OverallCritically LowCritically Lowyes