Non-Cochrane · aetiology · PM35263806

Caries in children with and without orofacial clefting: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Grewcock Rebecca E, Innes Nicola P T, Mossey Peter A, et al. · Oral diseases · 2022 · PubMed · doi:10.1111/odi.14183

Full textEvery question was extracted from the full text, figures and supplements by two independent LLM extractors, disagreements adjudicated. Rows cite where in the review the value comes from.
Questions
13
current version
GRADE rated
0
No studies
0
Included studies
32
linked below
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 13 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationChildren in the primary dentition with non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) and comparable groups of children without CL/P4647 children in the primary dentition from 20 studies (21 reports), 12 countries (2091 CL/P; 2556 non-CL/P; 3863 in meta-analyses [1655 CL/P; 2208 non-CL/P])
InterventionCleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) (exposure)CL/P (CLP most common; CL, CP, UCLP, BCLP also represented; 5 studies reported caries by cleft type)
ComparisonChildren without CL/P (non-CL/P); national-data comparators excludedChildren without CL/P (n=2556)
OutcomesPrimary-dentition caries experience (dmft, dmfs, % caries experience, or other measure); secondary: care index (CI) and restorative index (RI); association of caries with cleft typeCaries experience higher in CL/P (overall SMD 0.46, 95% CI 0.15-0.77; 16 studies); dmft (3.2 vs 2.5), dmfs (4.1 vs 3.2) and % caries (64.84 vs 52.13) all higher in CL/P (Table 4); RI (5 studies) and CI (3 studies) described narratively (Table 5)
Study designsObservational and epidemiological primary research with caries data from clinical examination (case-control and comparative cross-sectional); studies without isolable primary-dentition data, non-English, or using national comparators excluded20 studies (n=15 case-control; n=5 matched comparative cross-sectional)
TimingNo date restriction on searchesStudies published 1989-2021

Search date: November 2021 (PubMed to Nov 2021; Scopus to Nov 2021; Cochrane CENTRAL to 2021; Web of Science only to June 2017). Databases: PubMed (1946-Nov 2021); Scopus (Elsevier, 1996-Nov 2021); Web of Science (1900-Jun 2017); Cochrane Library (CENTRAL, 1996-2021)

Questions and results

Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) vs No cleft lip and/or palate (non-CL/P)

Population: Children in the primary dentition with non-syndromic cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) and comparable children without CL/P
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Care index (CI = f/[d+m+f]) in the primary dentition
The care index tended to be higher in children without CL/P (2 of 3 studies), suggesting more extraction-based caries management in children with CL/P; not pooled (narrative; ungraded).
Source: Results (Care index and restorative index para); Table 5 · same question in other reviews
Two out of three studies for which the CI could be calculated (Nagappan 2019; Veiga 2016) showed a higher CI for non-CL/P children demonstrating a higher proportion of extraction-based treatment in CL/P children…3 studiesUngraded
Caries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)
Mixed dentition
In the mixed dentition, caries experience was significantly higher in children with CL/P (SMD 1.74, 95% CI 0.24-3.25; 4 studies; very high heterogeneity I2=99% driven by an outlier; ungraded).
Source: Results (Meta-analysis para); Figure 2 (forest plot, subgroup 1.1.3) · same question in other reviews
SMD 1.74 [0.24, 3.25]4 studies · 789 participantsUngraded
Caries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)
Primary dentition
In the primary dentition, caries experience was significantly higher in children with CL/P than without (SMD 0.27, 95% CI 0.06-0.49; 10 studies; ungraded).
Source: Results (Meta-analysis para); Figure 2 (forest plot, subgroup 1.1.1) · same question in other reviews
SMD 0.27 [0.06, 0.49]10 studies · 2366 participantsUngraded
Caries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)
Primary and mixed dentition
In the combined primary and mixed dentition, there was no evidence of a difference in caries experience between children with and without CL/P (SMD 0.09, 95% CI -0.59-0.76; 5 studies; ungraded).
Source: Results (Meta-analysis para); Figure 2 (forest plot, subgroup 1.1.2) · same question in other reviews
SMD 0.09 [-0.59, 0.76]5 studies · 708 participantsUngraded
Caries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)
Overall (all dentition groups)
Children with CL/P have higher primary-dentition caries experience than children without CL/P (pooled random-effects SMD 0.46, 95% CI 0.15-0.77; 16 studies, 3863 children; not GRADE-rated).
Source: Results (Meta-analysis para); Abstract; Figure 2 (forest plot, Total 95% CI diamond) · same question in other reviews
SMD 0.46 [0.15, 0.77]16 studies · 3863 participantsUngraded
Restorative index (RI = f/[d+f]) in the primary dentition
The restorative index tended to be lower in children with CL/P (3 of 5 studies), indicating a lower proportion of restoratively managed carious teeth; not pooled (narrative; ungraded).
Source: Results (Care index and restorative index para); Table 5 · same question in other reviews
Of the five studies for which the RI could be calculated, three of them (Dahllof 1989; Nagappan 2019; Veiga 2016) showed a lower RI for children with CL/P compared to children with no CL/P demonstrating a lower…5 studiesUngraded

Isolated cleft palate (CP) or other specific cleft type vs Cleft lip and palate (CLP) or other cleft type

Population: Children in the primary dentition with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P)
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Caries experience by cleft type
Whether cleft type is associated with caries experience could not be determined; the planned CP-versus-CL/P subgroup analysis was not possible owing to sparse isolated-CP data (5 studies described narratively; ungraded).
Source: Results (Cleft type para); Implications for future research para; Table 3 · same question in other reviews
Five studies investigated caries experience by cleft type (Howe 2017; Kirchberg 2014; Mutarai 2008; Sunderji 2017; Zhu 2010). A subgroup analysis comparing CP and CL/P as different entities was not possible due to the…5 studiesUngraded

Comparison

6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Caries experience - % with caries (descriptive), primary dentition
CL/P vs no CL/P; Table 4 (7 groups/6 studies)
% caries experience CL/P 64.84% vs no CL/P 52.13%6 studiesUngraded
Caries experience - mean dft (descriptive), primary dentition
CL/P vs no CL/P; Table 4 (1 group/1 study, Howe 2017)
Mean dft (SD) CL/P 0.59 (SD 1.35) vs no CL/P 0.11 (SD 0.54)1 studyUngraded
Caries experience - mean dfs (descriptive), primary dentition
CL/P vs no CL/P; Table 4 (1 group/1 study, Dahllof 1989)
Mean dfs (SD) CL/P 7 (SD 8.5) vs no CL/P 3.9 (SD 5.1)1 studyUngraded
Caries experience - mean dmfs (descriptive), primary dentition
CL/P vs no CL/P; Table 4 (6 groups/4 studies)
Mean dmfs (SD) CL/P 4.1 (SD 3.52) vs no CL/P 3.2 (SD 2.75)4 studiesUngraded
Caries experience - mean dmft (descriptive), primary dentition
CL/P vs no CL/P; Table 4 (15 groups/13 studies)
Mean dmft (SD) CL/P 3.2 (SD 2.22) vs no CL/P 2.5 (SD 1.53)13 studiesUngraded
Caries experience - % dft (descriptive), primary dentition
CL/P vs no CL/P; Table 4 (1 group/1 study)
% dft CL/P 7.4 vs no CL/P 8.11 studyUngraded

Included primary studies 32

Open as a trial list
StudyAlso included byOutcomes it informs hereTrial PICOResults
Ahluwalia 2004
Dental caries, oral hygiene, and oral clearance in children with craniofacial disorders.
PMID:14742659
1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Chopra 2014
Oral health in 4-6 years children with cleft lip/palate: a case control study.
PMID:25006561
1 other reviewCaries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)not extracted yetnot extracted yet
Lucas 2000
Dental health indices and caries associated microflora in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
PMID:11034026
1 other reviewnot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Sunderji 2017
Dental Caries Experience in Texan Children with Cleft Lip and Palate.
PMID:29070163
1 other reviewCaries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)not extracted yetnot extracted yet
Veiga 2017
Caries Experience and Periodontal Status in Children and Adolescents with Cleft Lip and Palate.
PMID:28390464
1 other reviewCaries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)not extracted yetnot extracted yet
Ahluwalia 2004
Dental Caries, Oral Hygiene, and Oral Clearance in Children with Craniofacial Disorders
DOI:10.1177/154405910408300218
this review onlyCaries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)not extracted yetnot extracted yet
Bokhout 1996
Increased caries prevalence in 2.5-year-old children with cleft lip and/or palate.
PMID:9021319
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Bokhout 1996/1997
Incidence of Dental Caries in the Primary Dentition in Children with a Cleft Lip and/or Palate
DOI:10.1159/000262366
this review onlyCaries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)not extracted yetnot extracted yet
Bokhout 1997
Incidence of dental caries in the primary dentition in children with a cleft lip and/or palate.
PMID:8955987
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Chaudhari 2021
Factors Affecting High Caries Risk in Children With and Without Cleft Lip and/or Palate: A Cross-Sectional Study.
PMID:33349037
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Dahllof 1989
Caries, gingivitis, and dental abnormalities in preschool children with cleft lip and/or palate.
PMID:2788042
this review onlyCaries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)not extracted yetnot extracted yet
Hewson 2001
Dental experience of cleft affected children in the west of Ireland
DOI:10.1002/j.1875-595x.2001.tb00825.x
this review onlyCaries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)not extracted yetnot extracted yet
Hewson 2001
Dental experience of cleft affected children in the west of Ireland.
PMID:11569666
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Howe 2017
Dental Decay Phenotype in Nonsyndromic Orofacial Clefting.
PMID:28535364
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
King 2013
Caries Experience of Chinese Children with Cleft Lip and Palate
DOI:10.1597/11-133
this review onlyCaries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)not extracted yetnot extracted yet
King 2013
Caries experience of chinese children with cleft lip and palate.
PMID:22376053
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Kirchberg 2014
Dental Caries in the Primary Dentition of German Children with Cleft Lip, Alveolus, and Palate
DOI:10.1597/12-106
this review onlyCaries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)not extracted yetnot extracted yet
Kirchberg 2014
Dental caries in the primary dentition of german children with cleft lip, alveolus, and palate.
PMID:23237430
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Lucas 2000
Dental Health Indices and Caries Associated Microflora in Children with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate
DOI:10.1597/1545-1569_2000_037_0447_dhiaca_2.0.co_2
this review onlyCaries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)not extracted yetnot extracted yet
Malay 2021
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlyCaries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)not extracted yetnot extracted yet
Mutarai 2008
Factors Influencing Early Childhood Caries of Cleft Lip and/or Palate Children Aged 18 to 36 Months in Southern Thailand
DOI:10.1597/07-017.1
this review onlyCaries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)not extracted yetnot extracted yet
Mutarai 2008
Factors influencing early childhood caries of cleft lip and/or palate children aged 18 to 36 months in southern Thailand.
PMID:18788870
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Nagappan 2019
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life and Dental Caries Status in Children With Orofacial Cleft: An Indian Outlook.
PMID:31198331
this review onlyCaries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)not extracted yetnot extracted yet
Parapanisiou 2009
Oral health status and behaviour of Greek patients with cleft lip and palate
DOI:10.1007/bf03321606
this review onlyCaries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)not extracted yetnot extracted yet
Parapanisiou 2009
Oral health status and behaviour of Greek patients with cleft lip and palate.
PMID:19627672
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Rawashdeh 2011
matched by author and year (probable)
this review onlyCaries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)not extracted yetnot extracted yet
Rawashdeh 2011
Dental and oral hygiene status in Jordanian children with cleft lip and palate: a comparison between unilateral and bilateral clefts.
PMID:21226848
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Sundell 2016
Caries prevalence and enamel defects in 5- and 10-year-old children with cleft lip and/or palate: A case-control study
DOI:10.3109/00016357.2015.1044562
this review onlyCaries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)not extracted yetnot extracted yet
Sundell 2016
Caries prevalence and enamel defects in 5- and 10-year-old children with cleft lip and/or palate: A case-control study.
PMID:25972142
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet
Tannure 2012
Caries experience in individuals with cleft lip and palate.
PMID:22583885
this review onlyCaries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)not extracted yetnot extracted yet
Zhu 2010
Caries Experience in Individuals with Cleft Lip and/or Palate in China
DOI:10.1597/07-076.1
this review onlyCaries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)not extracted yetnot extracted yet
Zhu 2010
Caries experience in individuals with cleft lip and/or palate in China.
PMID:20078202
this review onlynot statednot extracted yetnot extracted yet

Overlap with other reviews

Reviews that include the same primary studies are not independent evidence. Shared counts match studies by PMID, DOI or NCT, and otherwise by author and year (a probable match).