Primary study · included by 1 review

Dental Health Indices and Caries Associated Microflora in Children with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

Lucas 2000 · Lucas Victoria S., Gupta Ragini, Ololade Olubenga, et al. · The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal · 2000

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Caries in children with and without orofacial clefting: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · aetiology · 2022 · cited as Lucas 2000 · Figure 2 (forest plot, subgroup 1.1.2 primary and mixed dentition); Tables 1-3; References
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Caries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)
Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) vs No cleft lip and/or palate (non-CL/P)
SMD 0.09 [-0.59, 0.76]5 studies · 708 participantsUngraded
Caries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)
Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) vs No cleft lip and/or palate (non-CL/P)
SMD 1.74 [0.24, 3.25]4 studies · 789 participantsUngraded
Caries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)
Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) vs No cleft lip and/or palate (non-CL/P)
SMD 0.27 [0.06, 0.49]10 studies · 2366 participantsUngraded
Caries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)
Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) vs No cleft lip and/or palate (non-CL/P)
SMD 0.46 [0.15, 0.77]16 studies · 3863 participantsUngraded

1 including review in total.