Primary study · included by 1 review
Caries prevalence and enamel defects in 5- and 10-year-old children with cleft lip and/or palate: A case-control study
Sundell 2016 · Sundell Anna Lena, Nilsson Anna-Karin, Ullbro Christer, et al. · Acta Odontologica Scandinavica · 2015
doi:10.3109/00016357.2015.1044562journal-article
Trial PICO
Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.
Results
Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Caries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference) Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) vs No cleft lip and/or palate (non-CL/P) | SMD 0.09 [-0.59, 0.76] | 5 studies · 708 participants | Ungraded |
Caries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference) Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) vs No cleft lip and/or palate (non-CL/P) | SMD 1.74 [0.24, 3.25] | 4 studies · 789 participants | Ungraded |
Caries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference) Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) vs No cleft lip and/or palate (non-CL/P) | SMD 0.27 [0.06, 0.49] | 10 studies · 2366 participants | Ungraded |
Caries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference) Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) vs No cleft lip and/or palate (non-CL/P) | SMD 0.46 [0.15, 0.77] | 16 studies · 3863 participants | Ungraded |
1 including review in total.