Primary study · included by 1 review
Rawashdeh 2011
ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.
Trial PICO
Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.
Results
Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Caries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference) Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) vs No cleft lip and/or palate (non-CL/P) | SMD 0.09 [-0.59, 0.76] | 5 studies · 708 participants | Ungraded |
Caries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference) Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) vs No cleft lip and/or palate (non-CL/P) | SMD 1.74 [0.24, 3.25] | 4 studies · 789 participants | Ungraded |
Caries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference) Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) vs No cleft lip and/or palate (non-CL/P) | SMD 0.27 [0.06, 0.49] | 10 studies · 2366 participants | Ungraded |
Caries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference) Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) vs No cleft lip and/or palate (non-CL/P) | SMD 0.46 [0.15, 0.77] | 16 studies · 3863 participants | Ungraded |
1 including review in total.