Primary study · included by 1 review

Malay 2021

ProbableThe reviews cited this study without a PMID, DOI or NCT, so it is matched by first author and year. Two different studies by the same author in the same year could be merged here.

Trial PICO

Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.

Results

Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.

Included by

Caries in children with and without orofacial clefting: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Non-Cochrane · aetiology · 2022 · cited as Malay 2021 · Figure 2 (forest plot, subgroup 1.1.2; Not estimable - no variance data); Tables 1-3; References
Outcome this study informsPooled effectEvidenceCertainty
Caries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)
Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) vs No cleft lip and/or palate (non-CL/P)
SMD 0.09 [-0.59, 0.76]5 studies · 708 participantsUngraded
Caries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)
Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) vs No cleft lip and/or palate (non-CL/P)
SMD 1.74 [0.24, 3.25]4 studies · 789 participantsUngraded
Caries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)
Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) vs No cleft lip and/or palate (non-CL/P)
SMD 0.27 [0.06, 0.49]10 studies · 2366 participantsUngraded
Caries experience in the primary dentition (dmft/dmfs/dfs/deft/ds; pooled as standardized mean difference)
Cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) vs No cleft lip and/or palate (non-CL/P)
SMD 0.46 [0.15, 0.77]16 studies · 3863 participantsUngraded

1 including review in total.