Cochrane · intervention · CD008802

Oral health education (advice and training) for people with serious mental illness

Khokhar, MA, Khokhar, WA, Clifton, AV, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library

Full textEvery question was extracted from the full review (methods and results), not only its Summary of Findings table.
Questions
26
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
17
Included studies
3
as reported
No studies 17 · 65.4%Ungraded 4 · 15.4%Very low 2 · 7.7%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 3 · 11.5%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPeople with serious mental illness; majority aged 18 to 65 years, preferably as defined by NIMH 1987, or with diagnosed schizophrenia, schizophrenia-like disorders, bipolar disorder, or serious affective disorder; dual diagnoses (plus substance abuse) eligible; dementia, personality disorder and mental retardation excludedThree included RCTs, 1358 participants total; Almomani 2006 (n=50) and Almomani 2009 (n=60) each <100 participants, ISRCTN63382258 a cluster RCT (1248 enrolled; 1682 implied denominator for leaving the study early); all participants had schizophrenia; both sexes; USA (2 studies, same community centre) and UK (1 study)
InterventionOral health advice/training (educative component, preventative aim, ethos of self-empowerment; training = a process of learning particular skills to maintain one's own oral health); Monitoring (any means of observation, supervision, keeping under review, measuring or testing at intervals)Oral health education (Almomani 2006, n=50); Motivational interview + oral health education (Almomani 2009, n=60); Monitoring (ISRCTN63382258, n=1682)
ComparisonStandard care (oral health advice and monitoring not specifically emphasised beyond usual care); interventions could also be compared with each otherStandard care (n=50); Oral health education (n=60); No monitoring (n=1682)
OutcomesPrimary: Oral health (not owning a toothbrush; not seen a dentist in past year; not brushing teeth twice a day; not flossing twice a day; incidence of pain or infection related to dental caries; oral health knowledge score); Quality of life (change in independence; change in ADL skills; chronic pain; immobility; change in earnings/employment; change in social status; healthy days; general quality of life change/endpoint); Dental state (no clinically important change in plaque index; any change in plaque index; teeth lost due to decay; change in dental caries; periodontal disease; oral infections). Secondary: Global state; Mental state; Adverse events; Death (natural, suicide); Service use; Leaving the study early; General functioning; Social functioning; Economic (increased costs of health care)Dental state: average score modified Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (n=96); Knowledge: Oral Health Knowledge Questionnaire (n=56); Self regulation: Treatment Self Regulation Questionnaire (n=56); Leaving the study early (n=1792)
Study designsRandomised controlled trials (and economic evaluations conducted alongside included RCTs); quasi-randomised studies excludedRCT (n=3): two parallel-group (Almomani 2006; Almomani 2009) and one cluster-randomised (ISRCTN63382258)
TimingFour time periods: immediate (within one week); short-term (one week to six months); medium-term (six months to one year); long-term (over one year)Immediate/post-intervention plus follow-up: 4 weeks (Almomani 2006); 8 weeks (Almomani 2009); 12 months (ISRCTN63382258)

Search date: 2015-11. Databases: Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials (compiled from MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, BIOSIS, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, and clinical trials registries)

Questions and results

Current version only

Oral health education (advice and training) vs Standard care (oral health advice not specifically emphasised beyond usual care)

Population: People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per NIMH 1987, or with diagnosed schizophrenia, schizophrenia-like disorders, bipolar disorder, or serious affective disorder
CD008802.PUB3 (current) · 8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Leaving the study early
RR 1.67 [0.45, 6.24]
120 per 1000 vs 200 per 1000
1 study · 50 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Dental state: No clinically important change in plaque index
MD -0.5 [-0.62, -0.38]1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Downgraded: indirectness
Oral health: Not brushing teeth twice a day
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Adverse events: Clinically important specific adverse events
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Oral health: Not having seen a dentist in the past year
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Service use: Emergency medical/dental treatment
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Economic: Increased costs of health care
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Quality of life: Chronic pain
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies

Motivational interview plus oral health education vs Oral health education

Population: People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per NIMH 1987, or with diagnosed schizophrenia, schizophrenia-like disorders, bipolar disorder, or serious affective disorder
CD008802.PUB3 (current) · 11 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Leaving the study early
RR 3.00 [0.33, 27.23]
33 per 1000 vs 36 per 1000
1 study · 60 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Self regulation: Average score (Treatment Self Regulation Questionnaire, high score = good)
Autonomous
MD 0.7 [-0.43, 1.83]1 study · 56 participantsUngraded
Adverse events: Clinically important specific adverse events
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Service use: Emergency medical/dental treatment
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Dental state: No clinically important change in plaque index
MD -0.6 [-1.02, -0.18]1 study · 56 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness
Quality of life: Chronic pain
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Self regulation: Average score (Treatment Self Regulation Questionnaire, high score = good)
External
MD 0.2 [-0.93, 1.33]1 study · 56 participantsUngraded
Self regulation: Average score (Treatment Self Regulation Questionnaire, high score = good)
Introjected
MD 1.1 [0.22, 1.98]1 study · 56 participantsUngraded
Knowledge: Average score (Oral Health Knowledge Questionnaire, high score = good)
MD 5.4 [3.71, 7.09]1 study · 56 participantsUngraded
Oral health: Not brushing teeth twice a day
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Oral health: Not having seen a dentist in the past year
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies

Monitoring (any means of observation, supervision, keeping under review, measuring or testing at intervals) vs No monitoring

Population: People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per NIMH 1987, or with diagnosed schizophrenia, schizophrenia-like disorders, bipolar disorder, or serious affective disorder
CD008802.PUB3 (current) · 7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Quality of life: Chronic pain
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Adverse events: Clinically important specific adverse events
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Dental state: No clinically important change in plaque index
See comment; Not estimable; 0 (0 studies); no study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Oral health: Not brushing teeth twice a day
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Oral health: Not having seen a dentist in the past year
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Service use: Emergency medical/dental treatment
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Leaving the study early
RR 1.07 [1.00, 1.14]
645 per 1000 vs 690 per 1000
1 study · 1682 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias

Oral health advice (preventative information or counsel enabling the recipient to decide about their own oral health; educative component, preventative aim, ethos of self-empowerment) vs Standard care (oral health advice not specifically emphasised beyond usual care)

Population: People with serious mental illness; majority aged 18 to 65 years, preferably as defined by NIMH 1987, or with diagnosed schizophrenia, schizophrenia-like disorders, bipolar disorder, or serious affective disorder
CD008802.PUB2 · 8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Leaving the study early
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Oral health: Not brushing teeth twice a day
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Adverse events: Clinically important specific adverse events
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Quality of life: Chronic pain
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Oral health: Not having seen a dentist in the past year
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Service use: Emergency medical/dental treatment
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Dental state: No clinically important change in plaque index
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Economic: Increased costs of health care
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies

Oral health advice (preventative information or counsel enabling the recipient to decide about their own oral health; educative component, preventative aim, ethos of self-empowerment) vs Standard care (oral health advice not specifically emphasised beyond usual care)

Population: People with serious mental illness; majority aged 18 to 65 years, preferably as defined by NIMH 1987, or with diagnosed schizophrenia, schizophrenia-like disorders, bipolar disorder, or serious affective disorder
CD008802 · 8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Leaving the study early
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life: Chronic pain
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Dental state: No clinically important change in plaque index
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Economic: Increased costs of health care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Service use: Emergency medical/dental treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events: Clinically important specific adverse events
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Oral health: Not having seen a dentist in the past year
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Oral health: Not brushing teeth twice a day
no estimate extractedNRNo studies