Same question across reviews · CL0288

intervention :: Unclassified intervention -> Microbiological/plaque

ProposalThis cluster groups questions by review type, intervention category and outcome domain. It is a proposal pending human validation, so questions in it may differ in population, comparator or timing.
Reviews
15
Questions
74
current versions
GRADE rated
7
Review overlap (CCA)
0.010
over all included studies of these reviews, not this question only
QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Anticaries vaccine or antibody (DNA, recombinant protein, nanoparticle-adjuvanted, live-vector, plant-based, or passive IgY immunization) targeting S. mutans vs Control (unvaccinated / empty vector / PBS / placebo animals)
Streptococcus mutans colonization reduction (narrative; no CFU data reported) · Animal caries models (mice, rats, hamsters) challenged/colonized with Streptococcus mutans; one transgenic-plant…
Assessing the Efficacy and Immunogenicity of Anticaries Vaccine-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2025)
no estimate extractedNRUngraded
Anticaries vaccine or antibody (DNA, recombinant protein, nanoparticle-adjuvanted, live-vector, plant-based, or passive IgY immunization) targeting S. mutans vs Control (unvaccinated / empty vector / PBS / placebo animals)
Salivary / secretory IgA (SIgA) antibody response (immunogenicity) · Animal caries models (mice, rats, hamsters) challenged/colonized with Streptococcus mutans; one transgenic-plant…
Assessing the Efficacy and Immunogenicity of Anticaries Vaccine-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. (2025)
no estimate extractedNRUngraded
Gamified oral health interventions (mobile apps, serious games, augmented reality, game-based education) vs Conventional or traditional oral health education, or non-gamified interventions (comparator varied; several studies were single-arm/uncontrolled)
Plaque control / oral hygiene clinical status (plaque index) · Children and adolescents aged <=18 years · Post-intervention (predominantly short-term; long-term follow-up in a minority of studies)
The Application of Gamification in Children's Oral Health Management: Systematic Review. (2025)
In the gamified mobile health app group, plaque control was superior (P<.05) compared with the conventional method group [Zolfaghari 2021]; a gamified/reminder sticker-book group showed a significant improvement in…NRUngraded
Transbond XT with 1% chitosan and 1% TiO2 nanoparticles vs Transbond XT adhesive
Streptococcus mutans count · Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment · 1 day, 2 months, and 6 months after bonding
Can Orthodontic Adhesive Systems Inhibit the Formation and Development of White Spot Lesions During Fixed… (2024)
Experimental group: significant decrease in S. mutans count was observed at the time points of 1 day, 2 months, and 6 months for both maxillary lateral incisor (p = 0.01) and maxillary second premolar teeth (p = 0.001).1 study · 24 participantsUngraded
TiO2-modified composite (1 wt.%) vs Control composite in contralateral quadrant
Streptococcus mutans population · Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment · 1 to 6 months after bonding
Can Orthodontic Adhesive Systems Inhibit the Formation and Development of White Spot Lesions During Fixed… (2024)
No statistically significant difference between the S. mutans populations on the control and test sides at any time point.1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
nCaF2 primer vs Control Transbond primer
Streptococcus mutans count · Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment · 1, 3, and 6 months after bonding
Can Orthodontic Adhesive Systems Inhibit the Formation and Development of White Spot Lesions During Fixed… (2024)
Statistically significant difference in bacterial count between the two primers only at T1 (p-value = 0.000).1 study · 31 participantsUngraded
Clear aligners (CA) vs Conventional fixed orthodontic appliances (CF)
Plaque accumulation (Plaque Index) · Orthodontic patients undergoing comprehensive treatment (late mixed or permanent dentition, no active caries) · Range 1 to 18 months (maximum time-point per study), Study design: randomized controlled trials
White spot lesions, plaque accumulation and salivary caries-associated bacteria in clear aligners compared… (2023)
SMD -1.79 [-3.63, 0.04]3 studies · 111 participantsModerate
Clear aligners (CA) vs Conventional fixed orthodontic appliances (CF)
Plaque accumulation (Plaque Index) · Orthodontic patients undergoing comprehensive treatment (late mixed or permanent dentition, no active caries) · 6 months, Follow-up: 6 months
White spot lesions, plaque accumulation and salivary caries-associated bacteria in clear aligners compared… (2023)
SMD -2.04 [-3.37, -0.70]5 studies · 253 participantsUngraded
Clear aligners (CA) vs Conventional fixed orthodontic appliances (CF)
Plaque accumulation (Plaque Index) · Orthodontic patients undergoing comprehensive treatment (late mixed or permanent dentition, no active caries) · Range 1 to 12 months (maximum time-point per study), Study design: non-randomized studies of interventions
White spot lesions, plaque accumulation and salivary caries-associated bacteria in clear aligners compared… (2023)
SMD -1.46 [-2.77, -0.15]5 studies · 246 participantsModerate
Clear aligners (CA) vs Conventional fixed orthodontic appliances (CF)
Salivary caries-associated bacteria (S. mutans and Lactobacilli, subjects with >10^5 CFU/mL) · Orthodontic patients undergoing comprehensive treatment (late mixed or permanent dentition, no active caries) · 3 and 6 months
White spot lesions, plaque accumulation and salivary caries-associated bacteria in clear aligners compared… (2023)
Not meta-analyzed (insufficient number of studies). Both included observational studies (Mummolo 2020 [19]; Mummolo 2020 [25]) reported a higher number of subjects with S. mutans and Lactobacilli >10^5 CFU/mL in the…2 studiesUngraded
Clear aligners (CA) vs Conventional fixed orthodontic appliances (CF)
Plaque accumulation (Plaque Index) · Orthodontic patients undergoing comprehensive treatment (late mixed or permanent dentition, no active caries) · 3 months, Follow-up: 3 months
White spot lesions, plaque accumulation and salivary caries-associated bacteria in clear aligners compared… (2023)
SMD -1.08 [-1.93, -0.24]5 studies · 211 participantsUngraded
Clear aligners (CA) vs Conventional fixed orthodontic appliances (CF)
Plaque accumulation (Plaque Index) · Orthodontic patients undergoing comprehensive treatment (late mixed or permanent dentition, no active caries) · Maximum reported time-point per study (range 1-18 months)
White spot lesions, plaque accumulation and salivary caries-associated bacteria in clear aligners compared… (2023)
SMD -1.58 [-2.57, -0.58]8 studies · 357 participantsUngraded
Clear aligners (CA) vs Conventional fixed orthodontic appliances (CF)
Plaque accumulation (Plaque Index) · Orthodontic patients undergoing comprehensive treatment (late mixed or permanent dentition, no active caries) · 12 months, Follow-up: 12 months
White spot lesions, plaque accumulation and salivary caries-associated bacteria in clear aligners compared… (2023)
SMD -2.14 [-3.64, -0.64]3 studies · 113 participantsUngraded
Periodontal treatment (subgingival instrumentation, with or without antimicrobials/surgery) vs No active intervention/usual care
Plaque index (PI) / oral hygiene · People with diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2, mostly type 2) and periodontitis, at least 16 years of age · 3-4 months
Treatment of periodontitis for glycaemic control in people with diabetes mellitus (2022) · Cochrane
SMD -2.05 [-2.57, -1.53]18 studiesUngraded
Clear aligners (Invisalign / thermoformed aligners) vs Fixed appliances
Plaque index (PI) · Adults undergoing orthodontic treatment · 6 to 12 weeks, Adults
Impact of Aligners and Fixed Appliances on Oral Health during Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review and… (2021)
MD -0.58 [-0.82, -0.34]4 studies · 202 participantsVery low
Clear aligners (Invisalign / thermoformed aligners) vs Fixed appliances
S. mutans presence (CFU > 10^5) · Adults undergoing orthodontic treatment · 3 months, Adults
Impact of Aligners and Fixed Appliances on Oral Health during Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review and… (2021)
RR 0.07 [0.01, 0.49]2 studies · 140 participantsLow
Clear aligners (Invisalign / thermoformed aligners) vs Fixed appliances
Plaque index (PI) · Adolescents/teenagers undergoing orthodontic treatment · 18 months, Adolescents
Impact of Aligners and Fixed Appliances on Oral Health during Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review and… (2021)
MD -0.40 [-0.77, -0.03]1 studyUngraded
Clear aligners (Invisalign / thermoformed aligners) vs Fixed appliances
S. mutans presence · Adolescents/teenagers undergoing orthodontic treatment · 1 month, Adolescents
Impact of Aligners and Fixed Appliances on Oral Health during Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review and… (2021)
RR 0.86 [0.64, 1.14]1 studyUngraded
Clear aligners (Invisalign / thermoformed aligners) vs Fixed appliances
S. mutans presence (CFU > 10^5) · Adults undergoing orthodontic treatment · 6 months, Adults
Impact of Aligners and Fixed Appliances on Oral Health during Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review and… (2021)
RR 0.22 [0.10, 0.51]2 studies · 140 participantsLow
Clear aligners (Invisalign / thermoformed aligners) vs Fixed appliances
Simplified plaque index (s-PI) · Adolescents/teenagers undergoing orthodontic treatment · 1 month, Adolescents
Impact of Aligners and Fixed Appliances on Oral Health during Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review and… (2021)
MD -14.78 [-16.74, -12.82]1 studyUngraded
Clear aligners (Invisalign / thermoformed aligners) vs Fixed appliances
S. mutans counts (5th-root transformed) · Adolescents/teenagers undergoing orthodontic treatment · 1 month, Adolescents
Impact of Aligners and Fixed Appliances on Oral Health during Orthodontic Treatment: A Systematic Review and… (2021)
MD -2.22 [-6.82, 2.38]1 studyUngraded
Intraglandular botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injection vs No BoNT (placebo or pre-treatment baseline)
Salivary Lactobacilli counts · Patients with drooling (sialorrhea) due to neurological disease · Before vs after BoNT injection (2018 study: significant Lactobacilli increase at 1 month; Wu 2011 and 2017 study no change)
Oral health effects of botulinum toxin treatment for drooling: a systematic review. (2020)
No statistically significant changes in Lactobacilli CFU counts were reported by Wu et al. or by Tiigimae-Saar 2017. However, the 2018 study found that Lactobacilli CFU counts were significantly increased one month…3 studiesUngraded
Clindamycin + SRP vs Doxycycline + SRP
Antimicrobial resistance · Adults with aggressive periodontitis · Long-term (≥ 1 year)
Adjunctive systemic antimicrobials for the non‐surgical treatment of periodontitis (2020) · Cochrane
Included studies have not reported this outcomeNRNo studies
Intraglandular botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injection vs No BoNT (placebo or pre-treatment baseline)
Salivary osmolality (hydration level) · Patients with drooling (sialorrhea) due to neurological disease
Oral health effects of botulinum toxin treatment for drooling: a systematic review. (2020)
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Intraglandular botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injection vs No BoNT (placebo or pre-treatment baseline)
Salivary Streptococcus mutans counts · Patients with drooling (sialorrhea) due to neurological disease · Before vs after BoNT injection
Oral health effects of botulinum toxin treatment for drooling: a systematic review. (2020)
The RCT by Wu et al. reported no statistically significant changes in S. mutans CFU counts (p-values only). The studies of Tiigimae-Saar did not find statistically significant differences in S. mutans CFU counts either.3 studiesUngraded
Doxycycline + SRP vs Metronidazole + SRP
Antimicrobial resistance · Adults with aggressive periodontitis · Long-term (≥ 1 year)
Adjunctive systemic antimicrobials for the non‐surgical treatment of periodontitis (2020) · Cochrane
Included studies have not reported this outcomeNRNo studies
Intraglandular botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injection vs No BoNT (placebo or pre-treatment baseline)
Oral/salivary pH · Patients with drooling (sialorrhea) due to neurological disease · Before vs after BoNT injection
Oral health effects of botulinum toxin treatment for drooling: a systematic review. (2020)
Wu et al. did not observe significant differences in participants' oral pH before and after BoNT-A injections between the active and control groups. There were also no statistically significant differences regarding…3 studiesUngraded
Clindamycin + SRP vs Metronidazole + SRP
Antimicrobial resistance · Adults with aggressive periodontitis · Long-term (≥ 1 year)
Adjunctive systemic antimicrobials for the non‐surgical treatment of periodontitis (2020) · Cochrane
Included studies have not reported this outcomeNRNo studies
Amoxicillin + clavulanate + SRP vs SRP
Antimicrobial resistance · Adults with chronic periodontitis · Long-term (≥ 1 year)
Adjunctive systemic antimicrobials for the non‐surgical treatment of periodontitis (2020) · Cochrane
Included studies have not reported this outcomeNRNo studies
Amoxicillin + metronidazole + SRP vs SRP
Antimicrobial resistance · Adults with periodontitis (chronic and aggressive) · Long-term (≥ 1 year)
Adjunctive systemic antimicrobials for the non‐surgical treatment of periodontitis (2020) · Cochrane
Included studies have not reported this outcomeNRNo studies
Clindamycin + SRP vs SRP
Antimicrobial resistance · Adults with aggressive periodontitis · Long-term (≥ 1 year)
Adjunctive systemic antimicrobials for the non‐surgical treatment of periodontitis (2020) · Cochrane
Included studies have not reported this outcomeNRNo studies
Azithromycin + SRP vs SRP
Antimicrobial resistance · Adults with periodontitis (chronic and aggressive) · Long-term (≥ 1 year)
Adjunctive systemic antimicrobials for the non‐surgical treatment of periodontitis (2020) · Cochrane
Included studies have not reported this outcomeNRNo studies
Doxycycline + SRP vs SRP
Antimicrobial resistance · Adults with aggressive periodontitis · Long-term (≥ 1 year)
Adjunctive systemic antimicrobials for the non‐surgical treatment of periodontitis (2020) · Cochrane
Included studies have not reported this outcomeNRNo studies
Metronidazole + SRP vs SRP
Antimicrobial resistance · Adults with periodontitis (chronic and aggressive) · Long-term (≥ 1 year)
Adjunctive systemic antimicrobials for the non‐surgical treatment of periodontitis (2020) · Cochrane
Included studies have not reported this outcomeNRNo studies
Intraglandular botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injection vs No BoNT (placebo or pre-treatment baseline)
Salivary buffering capacity · Patients with drooling (sialorrhea) due to neurological disease · Before vs after BoNT injection (2018 study: significant buffering increase at 1 month; 2017 study no change)
Oral health effects of botulinum toxin treatment for drooling: a systematic review. (2020)
The quasi-experimental studies of Tiigimae-Saar found different results concerning the changes in buffering capacity. For the analysis carried out in 2017, no statistically significant change was observed. By contrast,…2 studiesUngraded
Tetracycline + SRP vs SRP
Antimicrobial resistance · Adults with aggressive periodontitis · Long-term (≥ 1 year)
Adjunctive systemic antimicrobials for the non‐surgical treatment of periodontitis (2020) · Cochrane
Included studies have not reported this outcomeNRNo studies
Placebo rinse vs Pre-treatment (baseline, same group)
Lactobacillus count (pre- vs post-treatment) · Medically healthy individuals (adults and children, 6-60 years) · Pre- vs post-treatment
The antiplaque/anticariogenic efficacy of Salvadora persica (Miswak) mouthrinse in comparison to that of… (2019)
MD 0.34 [-0.50, 1.18]2 studies · 30 participantsUngraded
Placebo rinse vs Pre-treatment (baseline, same group)
Streptococcus mutans count (pre- vs post-treatment) · Medically healthy individuals (adults and children, 6-60 years) · Pre- vs post-treatment
The antiplaque/anticariogenic efficacy of Salvadora persica (Miswak) mouthrinse in comparison to that of… (2019)
MD 0.34 [-0.07, 0.76]5 studies · 71 participantsUngraded
Polaprezinc vs Azulene oral rinse
Salivary flow rate · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
No data on salivary flow rates were reported.0 studiesNo studies
Bethanechol vs Artificial saliva
Salivary flow rate (unstimulated, ml/min) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · End of RT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
MD 0.12 [0.01, 0.23]1 study · 36 participantsUngraded
Chinese medicine vs No treatment/placebo
Salivary flow rate (stimulated) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · End of RT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
MD 0.09 [0.03, 0.15]1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Metal-free cantilevered FDPs (feldspathic-veneered zirconia) vs Metal-ceramic cantilevered FDPs
Plaque index (PI) · Adults (18 years or older) needing replacement of one premolar or incisor with a cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis · 24 months
Metal‐free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations (2017) · Cochrane
MD -0.10 [-1.04, 0.84]1 study · 19 participantsUngraded
Amifostine vs No treatment/placebo
Salivary flow rate (mg/5 min, unstimulated) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · 12 months postRT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
MD 0.32 [0.09, 0.55]1 study · 27 participantsVery low
Palifermin vs Placebo
Salivary flow rate · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
None of the trials evaluating palifermin provided data on salivary flow rates.0 studiesNo studies
Pilocarpine vs No treatment/placebo
Salivary flow rate (unstimulated) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · Up to and including 3 months postRT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
MD -0.06 [-0.23, 0.11]1 study · 24 participantsVery low
Amifostine (intravenous) vs Amifostine (subcutaneous)
Salivary flow rate · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
No salivary flow rate data related to routes of administration of amifostine were reported.0 studiesNo studies
Amifostine vs No treatment/placebo
Salivary flow rate (unstimulated) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · End of RT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
MD 0.34 [0.07, 0.61]83 participantsUngraded
Bethanechol vs Artificial saliva
Salivary flow rate (unstimulated, ml/min) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · 8 to 40 weeks postRT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
MD 0.07 [-0.02, 0.16]1 study · 33 participantsUngraded
Bethanechol vs Artificial saliva
Salivary flow rate (stimulated, ml/min) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · 8 to 40 weeks postRT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
MD 0.21 [0.01, 0.41]1 study · 29 participantsUngraded
Bethanechol vs Placebo
Salivary flow rate (stimulated, ml/min) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region · 2 months postRT
Pharmacological interventions for preventing dry mouth and salivary gland dysfunction following radiotherapy (2017) · Cochrane
MD 0.15 [-0.03, 0.33]1 study · 97 participantsUngraded

All 74 questions, with filters