Cochrane · intervention · CD008802

Oral health education (advice and training) for people with serious mental illness

Khokhar, MA, Khokhar, WA, Clifton, AV, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library

Full textEvery question was extracted from the full review (methods and results), not only its Summary of Findings table.
Questions
26
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
17
Included studies
3
as reported
No studies 17 · 65.4%Ungraded 4 · 15.4%Very low 2 · 7.7%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 3 · 11.5%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationPeople with serious mental illness; majority aged 18 to 65 years, preferably as defined by NIMH 1987, or with diagnosed schizophrenia, schizophrenia-like disorders, bipolar disorder, or serious affective disorder; dual diagnoses (plus substance abuse) eligible; dementia, personality disorder and mental retardation excludedThree included RCTs, 1358 participants total; Almomani 2006 (n=50) and Almomani 2009 (n=60) each <100 participants, ISRCTN63382258 a cluster RCT (1248 enrolled; 1682 implied denominator for leaving the study early); all participants had schizophrenia; both sexes; USA (2 studies, same community centre) and UK (1 study)
InterventionOral health advice/training (educative component, preventative aim, ethos of self-empowerment; training = a process of learning particular skills to maintain one's own oral health); Monitoring (any means of observation, supervision, keeping under review, measuring or testing at intervals)Oral health education (Almomani 2006, n=50); Motivational interview + oral health education (Almomani 2009, n=60); Monitoring (ISRCTN63382258, n=1682)
ComparisonStandard care (oral health advice and monitoring not specifically emphasised beyond usual care); interventions could also be compared with each otherStandard care (n=50); Oral health education (n=60); No monitoring (n=1682)
OutcomesPrimary: Oral health (not owning a toothbrush; not seen a dentist in past year; not brushing teeth twice a day; not flossing twice a day; incidence of pain or infection related to dental caries; oral health knowledge score); Quality of life (change in independence; change in ADL skills; chronic pain; immobility; change in earnings/employment; change in social status; healthy days; general quality of life change/endpoint); Dental state (no clinically important change in plaque index; any change in plaque index; teeth lost due to decay; change in dental caries; periodontal disease; oral infections). Secondary: Global state; Mental state; Adverse events; Death (natural, suicide); Service use; Leaving the study early; General functioning; Social functioning; Economic (increased costs of health care)Dental state: average score modified Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (n=96); Knowledge: Oral Health Knowledge Questionnaire (n=56); Self regulation: Treatment Self Regulation Questionnaire (n=56); Leaving the study early (n=1792)
Study designsRandomised controlled trials (and economic evaluations conducted alongside included RCTs); quasi-randomised studies excludedRCT (n=3): two parallel-group (Almomani 2006; Almomani 2009) and one cluster-randomised (ISRCTN63382258)
TimingFour time periods: immediate (within one week); short-term (one week to six months); medium-term (six months to one year); long-term (over one year)Immediate/post-intervention plus follow-up: 4 weeks (Almomani 2006); 8 weeks (Almomani 2009); 12 months (ISRCTN63382258)

Search date: 2015-11. Databases: Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Study-Based Register of Trials (compiled from MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, BIOSIS, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PubMed, and clinical trials registries)

Questions and results

Show all 3 versions

Oral health education (advice and training) vs Standard care (oral health advice not specifically emphasised beyond usual care)

Population: People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per NIMH 1987, or with diagnosed schizophrenia, schizophrenia-like disorders, bipolar disorder, or serious affective disorder
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Leaving the study early
RR 1.67 [0.45, 6.24]
120 per 1000 vs 200 per 1000
1 study · 50 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Dental state: No clinically important change in plaque index
MD -0.5 [-0.62, -0.38]1 study · 40 participantsVery low
Downgraded: indirectness
Oral health: Not brushing teeth twice a day
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Adverse events: Clinically important specific adverse events
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Oral health: Not having seen a dentist in the past year
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Service use: Emergency medical/dental treatment
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Economic: Increased costs of health care
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Quality of life: Chronic pain
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies

Motivational interview plus oral health education vs Oral health education

Population: People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per NIMH 1987, or with diagnosed schizophrenia, schizophrenia-like disorders, bipolar disorder, or serious affective disorder
11 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Leaving the study early
RR 3.00 [0.33, 27.23]
33 per 1000 vs 36 per 1000
1 study · 60 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Self regulation: Average score (Treatment Self Regulation Questionnaire, high score = good)
Autonomous
MD 0.7 [-0.43, 1.83]1 study · 56 participantsUngraded
Adverse events: Clinically important specific adverse events
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Service use: Emergency medical/dental treatment
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Dental state: No clinically important change in plaque index
MD -0.6 [-1.02, -0.18]1 study · 56 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness
Quality of life: Chronic pain
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Self regulation: Average score (Treatment Self Regulation Questionnaire, high score = good)
External
MD 0.2 [-0.93, 1.33]1 study · 56 participantsUngraded
Self regulation: Average score (Treatment Self Regulation Questionnaire, high score = good)
Introjected
MD 1.1 [0.22, 1.98]1 study · 56 participantsUngraded
Knowledge: Average score (Oral Health Knowledge Questionnaire, high score = good)
MD 5.4 [3.71, 7.09]1 study · 56 participantsUngraded
Oral health: Not brushing teeth twice a day
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Oral health: Not having seen a dentist in the past year
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies

Monitoring (any means of observation, supervision, keeping under review, measuring or testing at intervals) vs No monitoring

Population: People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per NIMH 1987, or with diagnosed schizophrenia, schizophrenia-like disorders, bipolar disorder, or serious affective disorder
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Quality of life: Chronic pain
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Adverse events: Clinically important specific adverse events
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Dental state: No clinically important change in plaque index
See comment; Not estimable; 0 (0 studies); no study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Oral health: Not brushing teeth twice a day
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Oral health: Not having seen a dentist in the past year
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Service use: Emergency medical/dental treatment
No study reported useable data0 studiesNo studies
Leaving the study early
RR 1.07 [1.00, 1.14]
645 per 1000 vs 690 per 1000
1 study · 1682 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias