Same question across reviews · CL0216

intervention :: Oral hygiene/education -> Behavioral/uptake

ProposalThis cluster groups questions by review type, intervention category and outcome domain. It is a proposal pending human validation, so questions in it may differ in population, comparator or timing.
Reviews
5
Questions
13
current versions
GRADE rated
7
Review overlap (CCA)
NR
over all included studies of these reviews, not this question only
QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Theory-based oral health education/promotion interventions (HBM, TPB, SCT, HAPA, TTM, PMT, SOC, PRECEDE-PROCEED, MI) vs Control (waitlist, routine/standard oral health education, or minimal intervention)
Oral health attitude · Children and adolescents aged 5-18 years · Post-intervention (follow-up immediately after to 6 months, varies by study), Overall
Health promotion theory-based educational interventions for improving oral health in children and… (2025)
SMD 9.32 [7.08, 11.55]3 studies · 2370 participantsLow
Theory-based oral health education/promotion interventions (HBM, TPB, SCT, HAPA, TTM, PMT, SOC, PRECEDE-PROCEED, MI) vs Control (waitlist, routine/standard oral health education, or minimal intervention)
Oral health behavior · Children and adolescents aged 5-18 years · Post-intervention (follow-up 0.5 to 24 months, varies by study), Overall
Health promotion theory-based educational interventions for improving oral health in children and… (2025)
SMD 2.58 [2.03, 3.12]6 studies · 13973 participantsLow
Theory-based oral health education/promotion interventions (HBM, TPB, SCT, HAPA, TTM, PMT, SOC, PRECEDE-PROCEED, MI) vs Control (waitlist, routine/standard oral health education, or minimal intervention)
Oral health knowledge · Children and adolescents aged 5-18 years · Post-intervention (follow-up immediately after to 24 months, varies by study), Overall
Health promotion theory-based educational interventions for improving oral health in children and… (2025)
SMD 1.09 [0.80, 1.39]7 studies · 10904 participantsLow
Electric toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing) vs Manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing)
Behaviour, attitude and self-efficacy (participant/carer preference) · Children and adults with mixed levels of ID; setting home, residential, day care, school, mixed or not specified · Long term (>12 months)
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane
Comparison 2.8 (reported; not GRADE-rated). One NRS (Bratel 1991, 23 participants), self-efficacy at 16 months: 10/12 people with ID using the electric toothbrush reported a preference for it, finding it easier to use…1 study · 23 participantsUngraded
Oral hygiene training (toothbrushing routine) of people with ID vs No oral hygiene training of people with ID
Behaviour, attitude and self-efficacy (toothbrushing behaviour) (medium and long term) · Children and adults with mild to profound ID; setting residential or school · Long term (>12 months)
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane
Behaviour, attitude and self-efficacy (steps achieved in a toothbrushing routine), 100 days to 19 months; 59 participants (4 NRS); Very Low. Results not in a format for meta-analysis: 3 NRS (56 participants) reported…4 studies · 59 participantsVery low
Special manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing) vs Conventional manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing)
Behaviour, attitude and self-efficacy (carer experience) (medium term) · Children and adults with mixed levels of ID; setting home, residential, day care, school, mixed or not specified · Medium term (6 weeks to 12 months)
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane
Comparison 1.6 (graded in the Effects of interventions text; not tabulated in the SoF). Bildt 2010, Superbrush vs conventional, 4 months, 18 participants (1 RCT): carer handling of toothbrush MD 0.50 (95% CI -0.35 to…1 study · 18 participantsVery low
Oral hygiene care training of carers vs No training (or a placebo training session) of carers
Behaviour, attitude and self-efficacy of carers (medium term) · People with mixed levels of ID (age range unclear); setting residential · Medium term (6 weeks to 12 months)
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane
MD 0.15 [-0.80, 1.10]2 studies · 189 participantsVery low
Oral hygiene care training of carers vs No training (or a placebo training session) of carers
Oral health knowledge of carers (medium term) · People with mixed levels of ID (age range unclear); setting residential · Medium term (6 weeks to 12 months)
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane
MD 0.69 [0.31, 1.06]2 studies · 189 participantsLow
Educational intervention with information and practical components (theoretical oral health education plus practical skills training) for nursing staff and/or residents vs (Optimised) usual care
Oral health-related attitude of nursing staff · Nursing home nursing staff (approximately 95% female in the two contributing studies)
Oral health educational interventions for nursing home staff and residents (2016) · Cochrane
SMD 0.30 [-0.23, 0.83]2 studies · 459 participantsUngraded
Educational intervention with information and practical components (theoretical oral health education plus practical skills training) for nursing staff and/or residents vs (Optimised) usual care
Oral health-related knowledge of nursing staff · Nursing home nursing staff (approximately 95% female in the two contributing studies)
Oral health educational interventions for nursing home staff and residents (2016) · Cochrane
SMD 0.94 [-0.04, 1.92]2 studies · 453 participantsUngraded
Motivational interview plus oral health education vs Oral health education
Knowledge: Average score (Oral Health Knowledge Questionnaire, high score = good) · People with serious mental illness (all included participants had schizophrenia); majority aged 18 to 65 years per…
Oral health education (advice and training) for people with serious mental illness (2016) · Cochrane
MD 5.4 [3.71, 7.09]1 study · 56 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs No (active) intervention (usual/standard dental care or no-treatment control)
Dental knowledge · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis)
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Stewart 1996: for dental knowledge the control group showed no change pre- and post-intervention, whereas the psychological intervention group improved dental knowledge significantly (both intervention groups improved…1 study · 117 participantsUngraded
Psychological intervention based on a specified psychological model/theory (to increase adherence to oral hygiene instructions) vs Educational intervention (oral hygiene education/instruction)
Dental knowledge · Adults (aged 18 or over) diagnosed with periodontal disease (gingivitis or periodontitis)
Psychological interventions to improve adherence to oral hygiene instructions in adults with periodontal… (2007) · Cochrane
Stewart 1996: there was no difference in change in dental knowledge at post-intervention between the educational and psychological groups (both improved significantly relative to control).1 study · 78 participantsUngraded

Filter these questions further