Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

73 questions · 74 findings · 21 reviews

No studies found 10 · 13.5%GRADE not reported 3 · 4.1%Very low 24 · 32.4%Low 17 · 23%Moderate 20 · 27%High 0 · 0%

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs supportive treatment

Incidence of mechanical ventilation · children with acute bronchiolitis

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) showed no clear difference in proportion of children requiring mechanical ventilation compared with supportive treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Prophylactic CPAP vs mechanical ventilation

Failed treatment defined as the need for mechanical ventilation · preterm infants

Prophylactic CPAP probably leads to lower failed treatment defined as the need for mechanical ventilation compared with mechanical ventilation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Duration of continuous positive airway pressure therapy (hours or days) · preterm infants less than 30 weeks' gestational age requiring conventional mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of Findings Table ‐ Low vs moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels

Treatment failure or need for mechanical ventilation · health problem or population

It is very uncertain whether summary of Findings Table ‐ Low changes treatment failure or need for mechanical ventilation compared with moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

HFNC vs nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation

Mechanical ventilation within 72 hours of trial entry · preterm infants requiring primary respiratory support

Nasal high flow showed no clear difference in mechanical ventilation within 72 hours of trial entry compared with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

HFNC vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

Mechanical ventilation within 72 hours of trial entry · preterm infants requiring primary respiratory support

Nasal high flow showed no clear difference in mechanical ventilation within 72 hours of trial entry compared with continuous positive airway pressure (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Nasal interfaces (single nasal prong, binasal prongs (long or short), or nasal masks) vs face mask

Intubation and mechanical ventilation in the DR · term and preterm infants resuscitated at birth, using positive pressure ventilation

It is very uncertain whether nasal interfaces (single nasal prong, binasal prongs (long or… changes intubation and mechanical ventilation in the DR compared with face mask (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review