Cochrane · systematic review · CD012778

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants

Bamat, N, Fierro, J, Mukerji, A, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library

NeonatalAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
12
current version
GRADE rated
9
No studies
3
Included studies
NR
No studies 3 · 25%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 9 · 75%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Summary of Findings Table ‐ Low compared to moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels for preterm infants receiving initial respiratory support

Population: health problem or population
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Death or BPD at 36 weeks PMA
Summary of Findings Table ‐ Low vs moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels
RR 1.02 [0.56, 1.85]1 study · 271 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Mortality, by hospital discharge
Summary of Findings Table ‐ Low vs moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels
RR 1.04 [0.51, 2.12]1 study · 271 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Moderate‐severe neurodevelopmental impairment at 18 to 26 months ‐ not measured
Summary of Findings Table ‐ Low vs moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
BPD, defined as supplemental oxygen use at 28 days of age
Summary of Findings Table ‐ Low vs moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels
RR 1.1 [0.56, 2.17]1 study · 271 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
BPD, defined as supplemental oxygen or positive pressure support use at 36 weeks PMA
Summary of Findings Table ‐ Low vs moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels
RR 0.8 [0.25, 2.57]1 study · 271 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Treatment failure or need for mechanical ventilation
Summary of Findings Table ‐ Low vs moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels
RR 1 [0.63, 1.57]1 study · 271 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Summary of Findings Table ‐ Low compared to moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels for preterm infants receiving postextubation respiratory support

Population: health problem or population
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Death or BPD at 36 weeks' PMA
Summary of Findings Table ‐ Low vs moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels
RR 0.87 [0.51, 1.49]1 study · 93 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Mortality, by hospital discharge
Summary of Findings Table ‐ Low vs moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels
RR 2.94 [0.12, 70.3]1 study · 93 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Moderate‐severe neurodevelopmental impairment at 18 to 26 months ‐ not measured
Summary of Findings Table ‐ Low vs moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
BPD, defined as supplemental oxygen use at 28 days of age ‐ not measured
Summary of Findings Table ‐ Low vs moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
BPD, defined as supplemental oxygen or positive pressure support use at 36 weeks' PMA
Summary of Findings Table ‐ Low vs moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels
RR 0.87 [0.51, 1.49]1 study · 93 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Treatment failure or need for mechanical ventilation
Summary of Findings Table ‐ Low vs moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels
RR 1.52 [0.92, 2.5]2 studies · 117 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency