Cochrane · systematic review · CD006567
Post‐embryo transfer interventions for assisted reproduction technology cycles
Abou‐Setta, AM, Peters, LR, D'Angelo, A, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014 · Cochrane Library
Gynaecology and FertilityAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
4
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 50%Low 2 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
More versus less bed rest
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Ongoing pregnancy rate per randomised woman More vs less bed rest | OR 0.88 [0.6, 1.31] | 2 studies · 542 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Clinical pregnancy rate per randomised woman More vs less bed rest | OR 0.88 [0.6, 1.31] | 2 studies · 542 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Fibrin sealant versus usual care
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Clinical pregnancy rate per randomised woman Fibrin sealant vs usual care | OR 0.98 [0.54, 1.78] | 1 study · 211 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Mechanical pressure versus usual care
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Clinical pregnancy rate per randomised woman Mechanical pressure vs usual care | OR 1.92 [1.4, 2.63] | 1 study · 639 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |