Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

3,601 questions in 252 reviews · Pregnancy and Childbirth

current versions
No studies 726 · 20.2%Ungraded 421 · 11.7%Very low 828 · 23%Low 993 · 27.6%Moderate 486 · 13.5%High 147 · 4.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
(4.1) PGE2 gel vs PGE2 tablet (all women)
Caesarean section · patients with induction of labour at term
Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.91 [0.72, 1.17]6 studies · 1046 participantsHigh
(4.1) PGE2 gel vs PGE2 tablet (all women)
Serious maternal morbidity or death · patients with induction of labour at term
Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.01, 8.09]1 study · 200 participantsUngraded
Chlorhexidine (vaginal wash or gel/cream) vs placebo or no treatment
Early onset GBS disease (sepsis and/or meningitis within the first seven days of life)) · women with vaginal or rectal colonization with GBS during labour and their preterm/term infants
Vaginal chlorhexidine during labour to prevent early‐onset neonatal group B streptococcal infection (2014) · Cochrane
RR 2.32 [0.34, 15.63]2 studies · 987 participantsVery low
Chlorhexidine (vaginal wash or gel/cream) vs placebo or no treatment
GBS pneumonia within the first seven days of life · women with vaginal or rectal colonization with GBS during labour and their preterm/term infants
Vaginal chlorhexidine during labour to prevent early‐onset neonatal group B streptococcal infection (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.35 [0.01, 8.6]2 studies · 987 participantsVery low
Chlorhexidine (vaginal wash or gel/cream) vs placebo or no treatment
Neonatal colonization with GBS within the first seven days of life · women with vaginal or rectal colonization with GBS during labour and their preterm/term infants
Vaginal chlorhexidine during labour to prevent early‐onset neonatal group B streptococcal infection (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.64 [0.4, 1.01]3 studies · 328 participantsVery low
Chlorhexidine (vaginal wash or gel/cream) vs placebo or no treatment
Neonatal mortality due to early‐onset GBS infection · women with vaginal or rectal colonization with GBS during labour and their preterm/term infants
Vaginal chlorhexidine during labour to prevent early‐onset neonatal group B streptococcal infection (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 190 participantsUngraded
Chlorhexidine (vaginal wash or gel/cream) vs placebo or no treatment
Adverse (mild) effects in the mother · women with vaginal or rectal colonization with GBS during labour and their preterm/term infants
Vaginal chlorhexidine during labour to prevent early‐onset neonatal group B streptococcal infection (2014) · Cochrane
RR 8.5 [1.6, 45.28]3 studies · 1066 participantsVery low
Chlorhexidine (vaginal wash or gel/cream) vs placebo or no treatment
Adverse (mild) effects in the neonate · women with vaginal or rectal colonization with GBS during labour and their preterm/term infants
Vaginal chlorhexidine during labour to prevent early‐onset neonatal group B streptococcal infection (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 1066 participantsUngraded
Chlorhexidine vaginal wash vs placebo
Chorioamnionitis Clinical findings · Pregnant women with a gestational age greater than 28 weeks, considered to be in labour receiving chlorhexidine…
Vaginal chlorhexidine during labour for preventing maternal and neonatal infections (excluding Group B… (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.1 [0.86, 1.42]3 studies · 3012 participantsModerate
Chlorhexidine vaginal wash vs placebo
Postpartum endometritis Clinical findings · Pregnant women with a gestational age greater than 28 weeks, considered to be in labour receiving chlorhexidine…
Vaginal chlorhexidine during labour for preventing maternal and neonatal infections (excluding Group B… (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.83 [0.61, 1.13]3 studies · 3012 participantsModerate
Chlorhexidine vaginal wash vs placebo
Neonatal sepsis Clinical findings · Pregnant women with a gestational age greater than 28 weeks, considered to be in labour receiving chlorhexidine…
Vaginal chlorhexidine during labour for preventing maternal and neonatal infections (excluding Group B… (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.75 [0.17, 3.35]3 studies · 2987 participantsLow
Chlorhexidine vaginal wash vs placebo
Blood culture confirming neonatal sepsis Clinical findings and confirmation by laboratory · Pregnant women with a gestational age greater than 28 weeks, considered to be in labour receiving chlorhexidine…
Vaginal chlorhexidine during labour for preventing maternal and neonatal infections (excluding Group B… (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.75 [0.17, 3.35]2 studies · 2077 participantsLow
Antibiotic prophylaxis vs no treatment
Infection rate at 2 weeks postpartum ‐ perineal wound infection in third‐ or fourth‐degree tear · Women with third‐ and fourth‐degree perineal tear during vaginal birth
Antibiotic prophylaxis for third‐ and fourth‐degree perineal tear during vaginal birth (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.34 [0.12, 0.96]1 study · 107 participantsModerate
Antibiotic prophylaxis vs no treatment
Infection rate at 6 weeks postpartum ‐ perineal wound infection in third‐ or fourth‐degree tear · Women with third‐ and fourth‐degree perineal tear during vaginal birth
Antibiotic prophylaxis for third‐ and fourth‐degree perineal tear during vaginal birth (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.38 [0.13, 1.09]1 study · 128 participantsLow
Antibiotic prophylaxis vs no treatment
Fever or puerperal febrile morbidity · Women with third‐ and fourth‐degree perineal tear during vaginal birth
Antibiotic prophylaxis for third‐ and fourth‐degree perineal tear during vaginal birth (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Early initiation of epidural analgesia vs Late initiation
Caesarean section · pregnant women (at term) requesting epidural analgesia in labour (regardless of whether the labour was spontaneous or…
Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia for labour (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.96, 1.08]9 studies · 15499 participantsHigh
Early initiation of epidural analgesia vs Late initiation
Instrumental delivery · pregnant women (at term) requesting epidural analgesia in labour (regardless of whether the labour was spontaneous or…
Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia for labour (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.93 [0.86, 1.01]8 studies · 15379 participantsHigh
Early initiation of epidural analgesia vs Late initiation
Duration of 1st stage of labour · pregnant women (at term) requesting epidural analgesia in labour (regardless of whether the labour was spontaneous or…
Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia for labour (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 14384 participantsLow
Early initiation of epidural analgesia vs Late initiation
Duration of 2nd stage of labour · pregnant women (at term) requesting epidural analgesia in labour (regardless of whether the labour was spontaneous or…
Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia for labour (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 studies · 14982 participantsHigh
Early initiation of epidural analgesia vs Late initiation
Apgar score <7 at 5 min · pregnant women (at term) requesting epidural analgesia in labour (regardless of whether the labour was spontaneous or…
Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia for labour (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.96 [0.69, 1.33]7 studies · 14924 participantsHigh
Early initiation of epidural analgesia vs Late initiation
Umbilical artery pH · pregnant women (at term) requesting epidural analgesia in labour (regardless of whether the labour was spontaneous or…
Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia for labour (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 14004 participantsHigh
Early initiation of epidural analgesia vs Late initiation
Umblical vein pH · pregnant women (at term) requesting epidural analgesia in labour (regardless of whether the labour was spontaneous or…
Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia for labour (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 14004 participantsModerate
Glycerine gel dressing vs usual care
Nipple pain Nipple trauma: midwife assessed based on scale of 1‐3 with: 1 = better/resolved, 2 = no change, and 3 = worse · breastfeeding women with sore nipples
Interventions for treating painful nipples among breastfeeding women (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 63 participantsLow
Lanolin vs expressed breast milk
Nipple pain Women's reports of 'absence of irritation' · breastfeeding women with sore nipples
Interventions for treating painful nipples among breastfeeding women (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.01 [0.93, 1.09]1 study · 152 participantsLow
Lanolin vs expressed breast milk
Nipple pain Women's reports of 'absence of irritation' · breastfeeding women with sore nipples
Interventions for treating painful nipples among breastfeeding women (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.56 [1.05, 2.32]1 study · 152 participantsLow
Lanolin vs expressed breast milk
Nipple pain Women's reports of 'absence of irritation' · breastfeeding women with sore nipples
Interventions for treating painful nipples among breastfeeding women (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.58 [0.27, 9.2]1 study · 152 participantsLow
Lanolin vs all‐purpose nipple ointment
Nipple pain Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire scale 0‐45 · breastfeeding women with sore nipples
Interventions for treating painful nipples among breastfeeding women (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 150 participantsModerate
Lanolin vs all‐purpose nipple ointment
Nipple pain Present Pain Intensity scale 0‐5 · breastfeeding women with sore nipples
Interventions for treating painful nipples among breastfeeding women (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 150 participantsModerate
Lanolin vs all‐purpose nipple ointment
Nipple pain Present Pain Intensity scale 0‐10 · breastfeeding women with sore nipples
Interventions for treating painful nipples among breastfeeding women (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 150 participantsModerate
Breast shells with lanolin vs usual care
Nipple pain 5‐point Likert scale with established test‐re‐test reliability · breastfeeding women with sore nipples
Interventions for treating painful nipples among breastfeeding women (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 61 participantsLow
Glycerine gel dressing vs breast shells with lanolin
Nipple pain 5‐point Likert scale with established test‐re‐test reliability · breastfeeding women with sore nipples
Interventions for treating painful nipples among breastfeeding women (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 64 participantsLow
Lanolin vs no intervention (control group)
Nipple pain 5‐point verbal descriptor scale · breastfeeding women with sore nipples
Interventions for treating painful nipples among breastfeeding women (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.97 [0.91, 1.04]1 study · 147 participantsLow
Lanolin vs no intervention (control group)
Nipple pain 5‐point verbal descriptor scale · breastfeeding women with sore nipples
Interventions for treating painful nipples among breastfeeding women (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.3 [0.63, 2.66]2 studies · 312 participantsLow
Lanolin vs no intervention (control group)
Nipple pain 5‐point verbal descriptor scale · breastfeeding women with sore nipples
Interventions for treating painful nipples among breastfeeding women (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.85 [0.63, 1.14]2 studies · 297 participantsLow
Expressed breast milk vs no intervention (control group)
Nipple pain 5‐point verbal descriptor scale · breastfeeding women with sore nipples
Interventions for treating painful nipples among breastfeeding women (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.96 [0.9, 1.03]1 study · 151 participantsLow
Expressed breast milk vs no intervention (control group)
Nipple pain 5‐point verbal descriptor scale · breastfeeding women with sore nipples
Interventions for treating painful nipples among breastfeeding women (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.17 [0.71, 1.92]1 study · 151 participantsLow
Expressed breast milk vs no intervention (control group)
Nipple pain 5‐point verbal descriptor scale · breastfeeding women with sore nipples
Interventions for treating painful nipples among breastfeeding women (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.62 [0.11, 3.63]1 study · 151 participantsLow
Antibiotics vs no antibiotics
Maternal wound infection · Women undergoing cesarean section.
Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.4 [0.35, 0.46]82 studies · 14407 participantsModerate
Antibiotics vs no antibiotics
Maternal endometritis · Women undergoing cesarean section.
Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.38 [0.34, 0.42]83 studies · 13548 participantsModerate
Antibiotics vs no antibiotics
Maternal serious infectious complications · Women undergoing cesarean section.
Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.31 [0.2, 0.49]32 studies · 6159 participantsModerate
Antibiotics vs no antibiotics
Adverse effects on infant · Women undergoing cesarean section.
Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Antibiotics vs no antibiotics
Maternal wound infection · Women undergoing elective cesarean section
Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.62 [0.47, 0.82]17 studies · 3537 participantsModerate
Antibiotics vs no antibiotics
Maternal endometritis · Women undergoing elective cesarean section
Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.38 [0.24, 0.61]15 studies · 2502 participantsModerate
Antibiotics vs no antibiotics
Maternal serious infectious complications · Women undergoing elective cesarean section
Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1.01 [0.04, 24.21]4 studies · 545 participantsLow
Antibiotics vs no antibiotics
Adverse effects on infant · Women undergoing elective cesarean section
Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Antibiotic vs placebo
Neonatal sepsis · Women with meconium‐stained amniotic fluid in labour, gestational age more than 24 weeks
Antibiotics for meconium‐stained amniotic fluid in labour for preventing maternal and neonatal infections (2014) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.21, 4.76]1 study · 120 participantsLow
Antibiotic vs placebo
Chorioamnionitis · Women with meconium‐stained amniotic fluid in labour, gestational age more than 24 weeks
Antibiotics for meconium‐stained amniotic fluid in labour for preventing maternal and neonatal infections (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.36 [0.21, 0.62]2 studies · 362 participantsModerate
Antibiotic vs placebo
Postpartum endometritis · Women with meconium‐stained amniotic fluid in labour, gestational age more than 24 weeks
Antibiotics for meconium‐stained amniotic fluid in labour for preventing maternal and neonatal infections (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.5 [0.18, 1.38]1 study · 120 participantsLow
Antibiotic vs placebo
Mortality and morbidity prior to discharge (Neonatal intensive care admissions) · Women with meconium‐stained amniotic fluid in labour, gestational age more than 24 weeks
Antibiotics for meconium‐stained amniotic fluid in labour for preventing maternal and neonatal infections (2014) · Cochrane
RR 0.83 [0.39, 1.78]1 study · 120 participantsLow
Antibiotic vs placebo
Side effects of treatment · Women with meconium‐stained amniotic fluid in labour, gestational age more than 24 weeks
Antibiotics for meconium‐stained amniotic fluid in labour for preventing maternal and neonatal infections (2014) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies