Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

75,239 questions in 5,342 reviews

current versions
No studies 15,213 · 20.2%Ungraded 10,323 · 13.7%Very low 17,528 · 23.3%Low 17,951 · 23.9%Moderate 11,190 · 14.9%High 3,034 · 4%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Summary of findings table ‐ Silicone earplugs vs no earplugs
Weight (kg) at 18 months' corrected age or later · preterm or very low birth weight infants
Noise or sound management in the neonatal intensive care unit for preterm or very low birth weight infants (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 14 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Silicone earplugs vs no earplugs
Height at 18 months' corrected age or later · preterm or very low birth weight infants
Noise or sound management in the neonatal intensive care unit for preterm or very low birth weight infants (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 14 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Silicone earplugs vs no earplugs
Days of assisted ventilation · preterm or very low birth weight infants
Noise or sound management in the neonatal intensive care unit for preterm or very low birth weight infants (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 24 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Silicone earplugs vs no earplugs
Days of initial hospitalisation · preterm or very low birth weight infants
Noise or sound management in the neonatal intensive care unit for preterm or very low birth weight infants (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 24 participantsVery low
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts vs conventional treatment
All‐cause mortality · adults with hepatorenal syndrome
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for adults with hepatorenal syndrome (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.88 [0.55, 1.38]2 studies · 130 participantsVery low
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts vs conventional treatment
Morbidity due to any cause · adults with hepatorenal syndrome
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for adults with hepatorenal syndrome (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.95 [0.77, 1.18]2 studies · 130 participantsLow
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts vs conventional treatment
Serious adverse events · adults with hepatorenal syndrome
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for adults with hepatorenal syndrome (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.6 [0.1, 24.59]2 studies · 130 participantsVery low
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts vs conventional treatment
Health‐related quality of life · adults with hepatorenal syndrome
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for adults with hepatorenal syndrome (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts vs conventional treatment
Participants who did not receive a liver transplant · adults with hepatorenal syndrome
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for adults with hepatorenal syndrome (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.03 [0.93, 1.14]2 studies · 130 participantsVery low
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts vs conventional treatment
Participants without improvement in kidney function · adults with hepatorenal syndrome
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for adults with hepatorenal syndrome (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.53 [0.27, 1.02]1 study · 70 participantsLow
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts vs conventional treatment
Length of hospitalisation measured in days · adults with hepatorenal syndrome
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts for adults with hepatorenal syndrome (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) screening vs visual assessment
Readmission for phototherapy for hyperbilirubinemia · newborns for hyperbilirubinemia
Transcutaneous bilirubinometry for detecting jaundice in term or late preterm neonates (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.25 [0.14, 0.46]1 study · 1858 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) screening vs visual assessment
Exchange transfusion · newborns for hyperbilirubinemia
Transcutaneous bilirubinometry for detecting jaundice in term or late preterm neonates (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.2 [0.01, 4.16]1 study · 1858 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) screening vs visual assessment
Phototherapy before hospital discharge · newborns for hyperbilirubinemia
Transcutaneous bilirubinometry for detecting jaundice in term or late preterm neonates (2024) · Cochrane
RR 2.67 [1.56, 4.55]1 study · 1858 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) screening vs visual assessment
Acute bilirubin encephalopathy · newborns for hyperbilirubinemia
Transcutaneous bilirubinometry for detecting jaundice in term or late preterm neonates (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.01, 8.18]1 study · 1858 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Transcutaneous bilirubin (TcB) screening vs visual assessment
Cost of care · newborns for hyperbilirubinemia
Transcutaneous bilirubinometry for detecting jaundice in term or late preterm neonates (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Frequency of wearing a seat belt assessed through self‐report · drivers or passengers travelling in passenger or commercial vehicles
Education, incentive, and engineering‐based interventions to promote the use of seat belts (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 986 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Crash‐related injury rates · drivers or passengers travelling in passenger or commercial vehicles
Education, incentive, and engineering‐based interventions to promote the use of seat belts (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Crash‐related mortality rates · drivers or passengers travelling in passenger or commercial vehicles
Education, incentive, and engineering‐based interventions to promote the use of seat belts (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Frequency of wearing a seat belt · drivers or passengers travelling in passenger or commercial vehicles
Education, incentive, and engineering‐based interventions to promote the use of seat belts (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 1407 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Crash‐related injury rates · drivers or passengers travelling in passenger or commercial vehicles
Education, incentive, and engineering‐based interventions to promote the use of seat belts (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Crash‐related mortality rates · drivers or passengers travelling in passenger or commercial vehicles
Education, incentive, and engineering‐based interventions to promote the use of seat belts (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Frequency of wearing a seat belt · drivers or passengers travelling in passenger or commercial vehicles
Education, incentive, and engineering‐based interventions to promote the use of seat belts (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 118 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Crash‐related injury rates · drivers or passengers travelling in passenger or commercial vehicles
Education, incentive, and engineering‐based interventions to promote the use of seat belts (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Crash‐related mortality rates · drivers or passengers travelling in passenger or commercial vehicles
Education, incentive, and engineering‐based interventions to promote the use of seat belts (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
All‐cause mortality at 31 to 100 days · Adults with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without…
Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies… (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.27, 3.7]3 studies · 451 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Number of participants with any bleeding ‐ not reported · Adults with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without…
Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies… (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Number of participants with clinically significant bleeding · Adults with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without…
Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies… (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 84 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Serious infections ‐ not reported · Adults with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without…
Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies… (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Length of hospital admission ‐ not reported · Adults with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without…
Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies… (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Hospital readmission rate ‐ not reported · Adults with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without…
Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies… (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Quality of life (0 to 3 months) · Adults with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without…
Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies… (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 431 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Number of participants with any bleeding (0 to 3 months) · Adults with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without…
Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies… (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.91 [0.78, 1.06]3 studies · 448 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Number of participants with clinically significant bleeding (0 to 3 months) · Adults with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without…
Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies… (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.94 [0.74, 1.19]4 studies · 511 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Serious infections (0 to 3 months) · Adults with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without…
Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies… (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.2 [0.93, 1.55]3 studies · 451 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Length of hospital admission (days) (0 to 3 months) · Adults with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without…
Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies… (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 388 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Hospital readmission (0 to 3 months) · Adults with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without…
Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies… (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.89 [0.52, 1.5]1 study · 299 participantsLow
Intervention NR
All‐cause mortality at 31 to 100 days · Adults with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without…
Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies… (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 84 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Quality of life ‐ not reported · Adults with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without…
Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies… (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Intervention (no. of studies/participants) · Patients with RRMS Interventions: Azathioprine, daclizumab, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate, Immunoglobulins,…
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta‐analysis (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Pegylated interferon beta‐1a (Direct evidence; 1 RCT; 1512 participants) · Patients with RRMS Interventions: Azathioprine, daclizumab, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate, Immunoglobulins,…
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta‐analysis (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.68 [0.56, 0.82]1 study · 1512 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Mitoxantrone (Direct evidence; 1 RCT; 51 participants) · Patients with RRMS Interventions: Azathioprine, daclizumab, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate, Immunoglobulins,…
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta‐analysis (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.4 [0.21, 0.74]1 study · 51 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Natalizumab (Direct evidence; 1 RCT; 942 participants) · Patients with RRMS Interventions: Azathioprine, daclizumab, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate, Immunoglobulins,…
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta‐analysis (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.52 [0.43, 0.63]1 study · 942 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Teriflunomide (Direct evidence; 1 RCT; 1169 participants) · Patients with RRMS Interventions: Azathioprine, daclizumab, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate, Immunoglobulins,…
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta‐analysis (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.66 [0.55, 0.78]1 study · 1169 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Placebo · Patients with RRMS Interventions: Azathioprine, daclizumab, fingolimod, glatiramer acetate, Immunoglobulins,…
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta‐analysis (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Intervention (no. of studies/participants) · Patients with RRMS Interventions: alemtuzumab, azathriopine, cladribine, dimethylfumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer…
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta‐analysis (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Alemtuzumab No direct evidence · Patients with RRMS Interventions: alemtuzumab, azathriopine, cladribine, dimethylfumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer…
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta‐analysis (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.57 [0.47, 0.68]NRHigh
Intervention NR
Azathioprine (Direct evidence; 1 RCT; 59 participants) · Patients with RRMS Interventions: alemtuzumab, azathriopine, cladribine, dimethylfumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer…
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta‐analysis (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.77 [0.51, 1.18]1 study · 59 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Cladribine (Direct evidence; 1 RCT; 1326 participants) · Patients with RRMS Interventions: alemtuzumab, azathriopine, cladribine, dimethylfumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer…
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta‐analysis (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.53 [0.44, 0.64]1 study · 1326 participantsHigh
Intervention NR
Dimethylfumarate (Direct evidence; 2 RCTs; 2307 participants) · Patients with RRMS Interventions: alemtuzumab, azathriopine, cladribine, dimethylfumarate, fingolimod, glatiramer…
Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing‐remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta‐analysis (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.62 [0.55, 0.7]2 studies · 2307 participantsModerate