Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

915 questions in 93 reviews · Emergency and Critical Care

current versions
No studies 141 · 15.4%Ungraded 22 · 2.4%Very low 216 · 23.6%Low 272 · 29.7%Moderate 188 · 20.5%High 76 · 8.3%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Intravenous propofol vs alternative intravenous sedative or hypnotic
Adverse effects (as defined by study authors) · emergency department procedural sedation
The use of propofol for procedural sedation in emergency departments (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 527 participantsVery low
Intravenous propofol vs alternative intravenous sedative or hypnotic
Participant satisfaction (as defined by study authors) · emergency department procedural sedation
The use of propofol for procedural sedation in emergency departments (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 413 participantsVery low
Intravenous propofol vs alternative intravenous sedative or hypnotic
Pain with injection · emergency department procedural sedation
The use of propofol for procedural sedation in emergency departments (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 193 participantsVery low
Mortality: prone position vs supine
Short‐term mortality (STM)Alive or dead · adults with acute respiratory failure
Prone position for acute respiratory failure in adults (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.84 [0.69, 1.02]8 studies · 2117 participantsLow
Mortality: prone position vs supine
Longer‐term mortality (LTM)Alive or dead · adults with acute respiratory failure
Prone position for acute respiratory failure in adults (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.86 [0.72, 1.03]8 studies · 2141 participantsLow
Mortality: prone position vs supine
Subgroup analysis of longer‐term mortality: severe hypoxaemiaAlive or dead · adults with acute respiratory failure
Prone position for acute respiratory failure in adults (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.77 [0.65, 0.92]7 studies · 977 participantsModerate
Mortality: prone position vs supine
Subgroup analysis of longer‐term mortality: lower tidal volume ventilationAlive or dead · adults with acute respiratory failure
Prone position for acute respiratory failure in adults (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.73 [0.55, 0.96]5 studies · 911 participantsModerate
Mortality: prone position vs supine
Subgroup analysis of longer‐term mortality: ARDS onlyAlive or dead · adults with acute respiratory failure
Prone position for acute respiratory failure in adults (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.85 [0.71, 1.01]8 studies · 1758 participantsModerate
Mortality: prone position vs supine
Subgroup analysis of longer‐term mortality: ≥ 16 hours/d proneAlive or dead · adults with acute respiratory failure
Prone position for acute respiratory failure in adults (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.77 [0.61, 0.99]5 studies · 1005 participantsModerate
Mortality: prone position vs supine
Subgroup analysis of longer‐term mortality: enrolment ≤ 48 hours after entry criteria/ventilationAlive or dead · adults with acute respiratory failure
Prone position for acute respiratory failure in adults (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.75 [0.59, 0.94]5 studies · 1024 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Functional exercise capacity Multiple different outcome measures used SF‐36 PF and AT (at 9 and 26 weeks) (Batterham 2014) SF‐36 PF and 6MWT (at 8 and 26 weeks) (Elliott 2011) ABC, Katz, TUAG (at 3 months) (Jackson 2012) SF‐36 PCS ( · adult survivors of critical illness
Exercise rehabilitation following intensive care unit discharge for recovery from critical illness (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 6 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Health‐related quality of life Multiple different outcome measures used EQ‐5D and EQ‐5D VAS (9 and 26 weeks) (Batterham 2014) SF‐36 PCS and MCS (8 and 26 weeks) (Elliott 2011) · adult survivors of critical illness
Exercise rehabilitation following intensive care unit discharge for recovery from critical illness (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 2 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Withdrawals Participant withdrawal following randomization before or during receipt of the intervention because of consent or medical reason · adult survivors of critical illness
Exercise rehabilitation following intensive care unit discharge for recovery from critical illness (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 341 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Adherence Participant completion of the intervention as described in the trial method · adult survivors of critical illness
Exercise rehabilitation following intensive care unit discharge for recovery from critical illness (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 21 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Mortality Death at any point during the trial duration · adult survivors of critical illness
Exercise rehabilitation following intensive care unit discharge for recovery from critical illness (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 483 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Loss to · adult survivors of critical illness
Exercise rehabilitation following intensive care unit discharge for recovery from critical illness (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 483 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Other adverse events Non‐mortality · adult survivors of critical illness
Exercise rehabilitation following intensive care unit discharge for recovery from critical illness (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 376 participantsLow
Pressure‐controlled ventilation vs volume‐controlled ventilation
Mortality in hospital · patients with acute respiratory failure due to acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
Pressure‐controlled versus volume‐controlled ventilation for acute respiratory failure due to acute lung… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.83 [0.67, 1.02]3 studies · 1089 participantsModerate
Pressure‐controlled ventilation vs volume‐controlled ventilation
Mortality in ICU · patients with acute respiratory failure due to acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
Pressure‐controlled versus volume‐controlled ventilation for acute respiratory failure due to acute lung… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.84 [0.71, 0.99]2 studies · 1062 participantsModerate
Pressure‐controlled ventilation vs volume‐controlled ventilation
Mortality on · patients with acute respiratory failure due to acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
Pressure‐controlled versus volume‐controlled ventilation for acute respiratory failure due to acute lung… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.88 [0.73, 1.06]1 study · 983 participantsModerate
Pressure‐controlled ventilation vs volume‐controlled ventilation
Duration of mechanical ventilation · patients with acute respiratory failure due to acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
Pressure‐controlled versus volume‐controlled ventilation for acute respiratory failure due to acute lung… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 983 participantsUngraded
Pressure‐controlled ventilation vs volume‐controlled ventilation
Barotrauma · patients with acute respiratory failure due to acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
Pressure‐controlled versus volume‐controlled ventilation for acute respiratory failure due to acute lung… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.24 [0.87, 1.77]2 studies · 1062 participantsLow
Pressure‐controlled ventilation vs volume‐controlled ventilation
Organ failure · patients with acute respiratory failure due to acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
Pressure‐controlled versus volume‐controlled ventilation for acute respiratory failure due to acute lung… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 79 participantsUngraded
Pressure‐controlled ventilation vs volume‐controlled ventilation
Quality of life · patients with acute respiratory failure due to acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
Pressure‐controlled versus volume‐controlled ventilation for acute respiratory failure due to acute lung… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Changes in objective sleep variables (SEI, SFI, REM sleep) · critically ill patients
Non‐pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted16 studies · 403 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Length of ICU stay · critically ill patients
Non‐pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 45 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Subjective sleep quality or quantity · critically ill patients
Non‐pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted18 studies · 1220 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Risk of delirium · critically ill patients
Non‐pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 177 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Any adverse event · critically ill patients
Non‐pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 72 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Mortality · critically ill patients
Non‐pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Economic outcomes · critically ill patients
Non‐pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Post‐pyloric tube feeding vs gastric tube feeding
Pneumonia ( · critically ill adult patients
Post‐pyloric versus gastric tube feeding for preventing pneumonia and improving nutritional outcomes in… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.65 [0.51, 0.84]9 studies · 819 participantsModerate
Post‐pyloric tube feeding vs gastric tube feeding
Mortality ( · critically ill adult patients
Post‐pyloric versus gastric tube feeding for preventing pneumonia and improving nutritional outcomes in… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.03 [0.83, 1.29]11 studies · 977 participantsModerate
Post‐pyloric tube feeding vs gastric tube feeding
Percentage of total nutrition delivered to participant ( · critically ill adult patients
Post‐pyloric versus gastric tube feeding for preventing pneumonia and improving nutritional outcomes in… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 692 participantsLow
Post‐pyloric tube feeding vs gastric tube feeding
Time required to achieve full nutritional target (in hours) ( · critically ill adult patients
Post‐pyloric versus gastric tube feeding for preventing pneumonia and improving nutritional outcomes in… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 432 participantsVery low
Post‐pyloric tube feeding vs gastric tube feeding
Duration of mechanical ventilation in days ( · critically ill adult patients
Post‐pyloric versus gastric tube feeding for preventing pneumonia and improving nutritional outcomes in… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 549 participantsModerate
Post‐pyloric tube feeding vs gastric tube feeding
Complications related to tube insertion ( · critically ill adult patients
Post‐pyloric versus gastric tube feeding for preventing pneumonia and improving nutritional outcomes in… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.51 [0.19, 1.36]4 studies · 324 participantsLow
Post‐pyloric tube feeding vs gastric tube feeding
Complications related to tube maintenance ( · critically ill adult patients
Post‐pyloric versus gastric tube feeding for preventing pneumonia and improving nutritional outcomes in… (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.63 [0.93, 2.86]7 studies · 638 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Risk of VAP at any time in participants intubated for ≥ 24 hours · People who are mechanically ventilated
Silver‐coated endotracheal tubes for prevention of ventilator‐associated pneumonia in critically ill patients (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.64 [0.43, 0.96]1 study · 1509 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Risk of VAP within 10 days of intubation in participants intubated for ≥ 24 hours · People who are mechanically ventilated
Silver‐coated endotracheal tubes for prevention of ventilator‐associated pneumonia in critically ill patients (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.51 [0.31, 0.82]1 study · 1509 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Hospital mortality · People who are mechanically ventilated
Silver‐coated endotracheal tubes for prevention of ventilator‐associated pneumonia in critically ill patients (2015) · Cochrane
RR 1.09 [0.93, 1.29]1 study · 1509 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Device‐related adverse events · People who are mechanically ventilated
Silver‐coated endotracheal tubes for prevention of ventilator‐associated pneumonia in critically ill patients (2015) · Cochrane
RR 0.65 [0.37, 1.16]2 studies · 2081 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Change in nausea severity at 30 minutes Visual analogue scale Scale from: 0 to 100 · people with nausea and vomiting
Drugs for the treatment of nausea and vomiting in adults in the emergency department setting (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 301 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Number of vomiting episodes · people with nausea and vomiting
Drugs for the treatment of nausea and vomiting in adults in the emergency department setting (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 301 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Adverse reactions · people with nausea and vomiting
Drugs for the treatment of nausea and vomiting in adults in the emergency department setting (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 301 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Proportion of participants requiring rescue medication Physician's discretion · people with nausea and vomiting
Drugs for the treatment of nausea and vomiting in adults in the emergency department setting (2015) · Cochrane
OR 0.3 [0.17, 0.53]3 studies · 299 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Participant satisfaction with intervention Self report · people with nausea and vomiting
Drugs for the treatment of nausea and vomiting in adults in the emergency department setting (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.07 [0.6, 1.91]2 studies · 216 participantsLow
Etomidate vs all other induction agents
Mortality · patients with endotracheal intubation in critically ill patients
Single induction dose of etomidate versus other induction agents for endotracheal intubation in critically… (2015) · Cochrane
OR 1.17 [0.86, 1.6]6 studies · 772 participantsModerate
Etomidate vs all other induction agents
ACTH stimulation test ACTH stimulation test is considered positive if the change in serum cortisol level was less than 9 μg/dL (248 nmol/L) after the administration of 250 μg of cosyntropin · patients with endotracheal intubation in critically ill patients
Single induction dose of etomidate versus other induction agents for endotracheal intubation in critically… (2015) · Cochrane
OR 2.37 [1.61, 3.47]3 studies · 519 participantsModerate
Etomidate vs all other induction agents
Random serum cortisol levels (μg/dL) after receiving intervention · patients with endotracheal intubation in critically ill patients
Single induction dose of etomidate versus other induction agents for endotracheal intubation in critically… (2015) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 105 participantsModerate