Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Every word you type has to appear somewhere in the question, and the closest matches are ranked first.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

75,239 questions in 5,342 reviews

current versions
No studies 15,213 · 20.2%Ungraded 10,323 · 13.7%Very low 17,528 · 23.3%Low 17,951 · 23.9%Moderate 11,190 · 14.9%High 3,034 · 4%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Early routine ERCP strategy vs early conservative management with or without delayed or selective ERCP strategy
Local complications defined by the Atlanta Classification (necrosis, abscess, pseudocyst) · patients with unselected patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis
Early routine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography strategy versus early conservative management… (2012) · Cochrane
RR 0.86 [0.52, 1.43]4 studies · 517 participantsModerate
Early routine ERCP strategy vs early conservative management with or without delayed or selective ERCP strategy
Systemic complications defined by the Atlanta Classification (organ failure including shock, pulmonary insufficiency, renal failure, and gastrointestinal bleeding; disseminated intravascular coagulation or severe metabolic disturbances) · patients with unselected patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis
Early routine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography strategy versus early conservative management… (2012) · Cochrane
RR 0.59 [0.31, 1.11]4 studies · 406 participantsModerate
MAOIs vs placebo
Pain (VAS) VAS from: 0 to 10 · patients with fibromyalgia syndrome
Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) for fibromyalgia syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 121 participantsLow
MAOIs vs placebo
Tender points Tender point score and number of tender points · patients with fibromyalgia syndrome
Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) for fibromyalgia syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 121 participantsLow
MAOIs vs placebo
Global assessment (by patient) VAS from: 0 to 10 · patients with fibromyalgia syndrome
Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) for fibromyalgia syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 121 participantsLow
MAOIs vs placebo
Physical function · patients with fibromyalgia syndrome
Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) for fibromyalgia syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
MAOIs vs placebo
Discontinuation due to adverse events · patients with fibromyalgia syndrome
Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) for fibromyalgia syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 149 participantsLow
MAOIs vs placebo
Adverse events (nausea and vomiting) · patients with fibromyalgia syndrome
Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) for fibromyalgia syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 89 participantsLow
MAOIs vs placebo
Sleep disturbance · patients with fibromyalgia syndrome
Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) for fibromyalgia syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Neurodynamic mobilisation vs no treatment
Short‐term overall improvement (three months or less) · People with carpal tunnel syndrome on a waiting list for carpal tunnel release
Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
RR 15 [1.02, 220.92]1 study · 14 participantsVery low
Neurodynamic mobilisation vs no treatment
Adverse effects · People with carpal tunnel syndrome on a waiting list for carpal tunnel release
Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 14 participantsVery low
Neurodynamic mobilisation vs no treatment
Short‐term improvement in CTS symptoms (VAS pain) (three months or less) Scale from: 0 to 5 · People with carpal tunnel syndrome on a waiting list for carpal tunnel release
Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 14 participantsVery low
Neurodynamic mobilisation vs no treatment
Short‐term improvement in functional ability or health‐related quality of life (hand function) (three months or less) · People with carpal tunnel syndrome on a waiting list for carpal tunnel release
Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
RR 9 [0.59, 137.65]1 study · 12 participantsVery low
Neurodynamic mobilisation vs no treatment
Short‐term improvement in neurophysiologic parameters (three months or less) · People with carpal tunnel syndrome on a waiting list for carpal tunnel release
Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 14 participantsVery low
Neurodynamic mobilisation vs no treatment
Long‐term improvement in CTS symptoms (more than three months) · People with carpal tunnel syndrome on a waiting list for carpal tunnel release
Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 14 participantsVery low
Neurodynamic mobilisation vs no treatment
Long‐term improvement in functional ability or health‐related quality of life (more than three months) · People with carpal tunnel syndrome on a waiting list for carpal tunnel release
Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 14 participantsVery low
Neurodynamic mobilisation vs no treatment
Need for surgery · People with carpal tunnel syndrome on a waiting list for carpal tunnel release
Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome (2012) · Cochrane
RR 0.33 [0.1, 1.12]1 study · 14 participantsVery low
IV + inhaled beta agonist vs inhaled beta‐agonist
Admissions to hospital · patients with acute asthma
Addition of intravenous beta₂‐agonists to inhaled beta₂‐agonists for acute asthma (2012) · Cochrane
OR 0.29 [0.06, 1.38]1 study · 29 participantsLow
IV + inhaled beta agonist vs inhaled beta‐agonist
Length of stay in emergency department · patients with acute asthma
Addition of intravenous beta₂‐agonists to inhaled beta₂‐agonists for acute asthma (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 46 participantsModerate
IV + inhaled beta agonist vs inhaled beta‐agonist
Pulse rate at 2 hours · patients with acute asthma
Addition of intravenous beta₂‐agonists to inhaled beta₂‐agonists for acute asthma (2012) · Cochrane
MD 101 study · 29 participantsModerate
IV + inhaled beta agonist vs inhaled beta‐agonist
Clinical Failure (children with a severe to moderate overall clinical assessment score at two hours) · patients with acute asthma
Addition of intravenous beta₂‐agonists to inhaled beta₂‐agonists for acute asthma (2012) · Cochrane
OR 0.09 [0.02, 0.38]1 study · 29 participantsModerate
IV beta‐agonists vs IV aminophylline
Length of hospital stay · patients with acute asthma
Intravenous beta₂‐agonists versus intravenous aminophylline for acute asthma (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 73 participantsModerate
IV beta‐agonists vs IV aminophylline
PEF (L/min) at 60 min · patients with acute asthma
Intravenous beta₂‐agonists versus intravenous aminophylline for acute asthma (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 59 participantsModerate
IV beta‐agonists vs IV aminophylline
FEV1 (L) at 60 min · patients with acute asthma
Intravenous beta₂‐agonists versus intravenous aminophylline for acute asthma (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 59 participantsModerate
IV beta‐agonists vs IV aminophylline
Heart Rate at 60 min · patients with acute asthma
Intravenous beta₂‐agonists versus intravenous aminophylline for acute asthma (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 82 participantsLow
IV beta‐agonists vs IV aminophylline
Clinical failure4 · patients with acute asthma
Intravenous beta₂‐agonists versus intravenous aminophylline for acute asthma (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 89 participantsModerate
Aloe vera gel vs Placebo
Side-effects reported · People with erosive oral lichen planus
Interventions for erosive lichen planus affecting mucosal sites (2012) · Cochrane
Table 3 (Side-effects). Choonhakarn 2008: no serious side-effects; 2 participants receiving aloe vera gel reported stinging and mild itching at lesions within the first week, symptoms spontaneously disappeared with…1 study · 45 participantsUngraded
Individualised homeopathic medicine (two doses over 24 hours) vs Placebo
Pain free by end of study (day 6) · Participants with a previous or current history of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS), diagnosed on history and… · 6 days
Systemic interventions for recurrent aphthous stomatitis (mouth ulcers) (2012) · Cochrane
RR 2.00 [1.39, 2.89]1 study · 100 participantsUngraded
Er:YAG laser debridement vs Manual debridement plus chlorhexidine irrigation/gel
Complications and side effects · People with at least one dental implant affected by peri-implantitis · 6 months
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis (2012) · Cochrane
Complications: risk ratio (totals not selected); one laser patient had a buccal keratinised mucosa perforation.1 study · 20 participantsUngraded
Betamethasone oral mini-pulse therapy vs Topical triamcinolone acetonide 0.1% paste
Physician Global Assessment (clinical severity, 0-12 score) · People with erosive oral lichen planus · 24 weeks
Interventions for erosive lichen planus affecting mucosal sites (2012) · Cochrane
MD 1.78 [0.17, 3.39]1 study · 22 participantsUngraded
Fluticasone propionate spray vs Betamethasone sodium phosphate mouthwash
Side-effects reported · People with erosive oral lichen planus
Interventions for erosive lichen planus affecting mucosal sites (2012) · Cochrane
Table 3 (Side-effects). Hegarty 2002: nausea (4), swollen mouth (1), bad taste and smell (6), difficulty in spray application (7), dry mouth (2), sore throat (1), red painful tongue (1), and pseudomembranous…1 study · 44 participantsUngraded
One-to-one advice on sugar restriction: detailed information on the sugar content of foods, with instruction to refrain from sugar-containing foods between meals and to reduce sugar in main meals (6-week sugar restriction) vs No advice on sugar restriction
Sugar intake frequency between meals (mean number of intakes per day) · Adults with frequent sugar intake harbouring Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus in saliva (14 dental… · Follow-up at 3, 6 and 12 weeks
One‐to‐one dietary interventions undertaken in a dental setting to change dietary behaviour (2012) · Cochrane
Table 5, mean (SD) intakes/day between meals: intervention 6.7 (1.9) baseline, 0.8 (1.0) at 3 weeks, 0.9 (1.0) at 6 weeks, 5.6 (3.0) at 12 weeks; control 5.3 (2.3), 5.2 (2.9), 4.6 (3.5), 4.7 (1.5). Significant…1 study · 20 participantsUngraded
Sodium hypochlorite 5.25% with hydrogen peroxide 3% vs Normal saline
Proportion of participants with moderate to severe pain 72 hours to 14 days after the procedure · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
RR 0.65 [0.2, 2.0]1 study · 161 participantsUngraded
Individually designed, patient-centred preventive programme: dietary counselling (snacking timing, regular meals, fermentable carbohydrates) plus toothbrushing counselling, delivered by trained dental hygienists (a multi-intervention) vs Basic prevention offered as standard in public dental clinics
Eating warm meals more than twice per day · Children aged 11 to 12 years with at least one active initial caries lesion, screened in a town in Finland · 2 to 4 years
One‐to‐one dietary interventions undertaken in a dental setting to change dietary behaviour (2012) · Cochrane
Table 2: 77% (193) versus 81% (200) at follow-up (baseline 83% versus 74%, a significant baseline difference). No significant change at follow-up.1 study · 497 participantsUngraded
Sodium hypochlorite 5.25% with hydrogen peroxide 3% vs Normal saline
Proportion of participants with new or worsening signs/symptoms of inflammation requiring a revisit, up to 14 days after the procedure · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Radix tripterygium hypoglaucum tablet (THT) vs Tripterygium glucosides tablet (TGT)
Partial response (remarkably effective or effective) · People with erosive oral lichen planus · Grade II (erosive lesions only)
Interventions for erosive lichen planus affecting mucosal sites (2012) · Cochrane
RR 0.29 [0.07, 1.27]1 study · 94 participantsUngraded
Sodium hypochlorite 5.25% vs Normal saline
Mean change in health-related quality of life or participant-expressed satisfaction with the procedure · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Flapless implant placement vs Conventional flap elevation
Patient preference · Patients receiving dental implants
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: management of soft tissues for dental implants (2012) · Cochrane
RR 106.70 [20.97, 542.82]1 study · 80 participantsUngraded
Sodium hypochlorite 5.25% vs Sodium hypochlorite 5.25% with hydrogen peroxide 3%
Change in periapical radiolucency (radiography or CBCT), up to 1 year after treatment · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Montelukast (leukotriene receptor antagonist; 10 mg daily for 1 month then alternate days for the second month) vs Placebo
Adverse effects · Participants with a previous or current history of recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS), diagnosed on history and… · 2 months
Systemic interventions for recurrent aphthous stomatitis (mouth ulcers) (2012) · Cochrane
The study reported equal drug-related adverse effects for those treated with montelukast and placebo.1 study · 40 participantsUngraded
Glucosamine sulfate (oral) vs Ibuprofen (oral)
Pain-free maximum jaw opening (mm), change from baseline · Adults (>18 years) with temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ OA) diagnosed by RDC/TMD or compatible criteria · 90 days
Interventions for managing temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (2012) · Cochrane
MD 1.75 [-4.10, 7.60]1 study · 45 participantsUngraded
Sodium hypochlorite 1% with chlorhexidine 2% final rinse vs Sodium hypochlorite 1% with normal saline final rinse
Proportion of participants with moderate to severe pain 72 hours to 14 days after the procedure · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Titanium framework FDP vs High-gold content alloy framework FDP
5-year prosthesis survival · Partially edentulous patients receiving tooth-supported FDPs · 5 years
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition (2012) · Cochrane
5-year prosthesis survival 84% (95% CI 0.79 to 0.89) titanium vs 98% (95% CI 0.96 to 1.00) high-gold alloy; statistically significant difference (P = 0.005)1 study · 47 participantsUngraded
Dietary counselling tailored to a Stage of Change (Transtheoretical Model) to increase fruit and vegetable intake (two counselling sessions) vs Usual care
Fruit juice consumption: risk of starting to drink fruit juice · Edentulous patients aged 45 to 80 years attending dental-student teaching clinics for replacement dentures, Newcastle… · 6 weeks after receiving replacement dentures (about 10 weeks after baseline)
One‐to‐one dietary interventions undertaken in a dental setting to change dietary behaviour (2012) · Cochrane
RR 1.09 [0.42, 2.85]1 study · 58 participantsUngraded
Chlorhexidine 0.2% vs Normal saline
Adverse effects · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Chlorhexidine 0.2% vs Normal saline
Change in periapical radiolucency (radiography or CBCT), up to 1 year after treatment · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Er:YAG laser debridement vs Manual debridement plus chlorhexidine irrigation/gel
Recurrence of peri-implantitis · People with at least one dental implant affected by peri-implantitis · 6 months
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis (2012) · Cochrane
RR 0.25 [0.03, 2.06]2 studies · 40 participantsUngraded
Sodium hypochlorite 5.25% with EDTA 17% vs Sodium hypochlorite 1.3% with MTAD
Proportion of participants with moderate to severe pain 72 hours to 14 days after the procedure · Patients aged 14 to 78 years with mature permanent teeth (fully formed roots), single or multi-rooted, with pulpal or…
Irrigants for non‐surgical root canal treatment in mature permanent teeth (2012) · Cochrane
Only a graph plot of 'average pain' over the 7-day postoperative period in each group was provided; this could not be transformed into usable data for the review's prespecified outcomes.1 studyUngraded
Extraction of the primary maxillary canine plus cervical pull headgear vs Extraction of the primary maxillary canine alone
Prevalence of eruption/non-eruption of the palatally displaced permanent canine (successful eruption) · Children with palatally displaced maxillary canines (at least 80% aged 10 to 13 years); trials with craniofacial… · At least 6 months follow-up after the intervention
Extraction of primary (baby) teeth for unerupted palatally displaced permanent canine teeth in children (2012) · Cochrane
Narrative (not pooled, not GRADE-rated). Leonardi 2004: extraction plus headgear (80%) gave significantly higher eruption than extraction alone (50%) (Chi2 4.69; P<0.05). Baccetti 2008: extraction plus headgear was…2 studies · 79 participantsUngraded
Any topical or systemic intervention (topical/systemic steroids, ciclosporin, tacrolimus, retinoids, anti-malarials, biologics, phototherapy, surgery) vs Placebo, no treatment, another active intervention, or a different dose of the same intervention
Reduction in severity of flares · People of any age with erosive lichen planus affecting the oral, anogenital, and/or oesophageal regions
Interventions for erosive lichen planus affecting mucosal sites (2012) · Cochrane
No studies reported this outcome.0 studiesNo studies