Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,005 questions · 1,053 findings · 151 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 275 · 26.1%GRADE not reported 150 · 14.2%Very low 271 · 25.7%Low 215 · 20.4%Moderate 105 · 10%High 37 · 3.5%

Surgical portosystemic shunts vs devascularisation with splenectomy

Any re‐intervention · people with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis

It is very uncertain whether surgical portosystemic shunts changes any re‐intervention compared with devascularisation with splenectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Standard care plus IV tranexamic acid vs placebo or usual care

Side effects of the intervention: Any maternal vascular occlusive event · women with primary postpartum haemorrhage following vaginal or caesarean birth

Standard care plus IV tranexamic acid showed no clear difference in side effects of the intervention: Any maternal vascular occlusive… compared with placebo or standard care alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Prothrombin complex concentrates vs any comparator

Number of complications probably related to the intervention · patients with vitamin K antagonist‐induced bleeding requiring acute intervention

It is very uncertain whether prothrombin complex concentrate changes number of complications probably related to the intervention compared with any comparator (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) FOR PROMPTING/SUPPORT + STANDARD CARE vs usual care

Acceptability (of intervention): Leaving the studies early – any reason Loss to · patients with treatment compliance for people with serious mental illness

INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) FOR PROMPTING/SUPPORT… showed no clear difference in acceptability (of intervention): Leaving the studies early – any… compared with STANDARD CARE (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antibiotics vs control ‐ primary outcomes

Prevention ‐ any AOM or CSOM during intervention · patients with the prevention of acute and chronic suppurative otitis media in children

Antibiotic probably leads to lower prevention ‐ any AOM or CSOM during intervention compared with control ‐ primary outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antibiotics vs control ‐ secondary outcomes

Side effects ‐ any clinical side effects during intervention · patients with the prevention of acute and chronic suppurative otitis media in children

Antibiotic showed no clear difference in side effects ‐ any clinical side effects during intervention compared with control ‐ secondary outcomes (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Repeat midurethral tape (any type) vs any other non‐tape surgical treatment (e.g. traditional sling, colposuspension, injectables)

Number of women whose incontinence was improved or cured ‐ · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repeat midurethral tape (any type) vs any other non‐tape surgical treatment (e.g. traditional sling, colposuspension, injectables)

Objective cure rates in the longer‐term ‐ more than 12 months, · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repeat midurethral tape (any type) vs any other non‐tape surgical treatment (e.g. traditional sling, colposuspension, injectables)

General health status evaluation e.g. Short Form (SF)‐36 ‐ not reported · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repeat midurethral tape (any type) vs any other non‐tape surgical treatment (e.g. traditional sling, colposuspension, injectables)

Condition‐specific instruments designed to assess incontinence ‐ e.g. BFLUTS · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repeat midurethral tape (any type) vs any other non‐tape surgical treatment (e.g. traditional sling, colposuspension, injectables)

Repeat surgery for urinary incontinence · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repeat midurethral tape (any type) vs any other non‐tape surgical treatment (e.g. traditional sling, colposuspension, injectables)

Adverse events · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review