Cochrane · systematic review · CD008898
Restorative justice conferencing for reducing recidivism in young offenders (aged 7 to 21)
Livingstone, N, Macdonald, G, Carr, N · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · Cochrane Library
Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning ProblemsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 6 · 85.7%Low 1 · 14.3%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Restorative justice conferencing for reducing recidivism in young offenders (aged 7 to 21 years)
Population: Offenders aged 7 to 21 years
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Number reoffendingadministrative data | OR 1 [0.59, 1.71] | 2 studies · 1029 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, publication bias |
Post‐intervention monthly offending rate (any offence)administrative data | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 321 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias |
Remorseparticipant interviews | OR 1.73 [0.97, 3.1] | 2 studies · 217 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias |
Recognition of wrongdoingparticipant interviews | OR 1.97 [0.81, 4.8] | 2 studies · 217 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, publication bias |
Self‐perceptionparticipant interviews | OR 0.95 [0.55, 1.63] | 2 studies · 217 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias |
Young offender satisfactionparticipant interviews | OR 0.42 [0.05, 3.81] | 2 studies · 467 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, publication bias |
Victim/key stakeholder satisfaction with overall processparticipant interviews | OR 4.03 [0.59, 27.75] | 2 studies · 428 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, publication bias |