Cochrane · systematic review · CD009960
Information and communication technology based prompting for treatment compliance for people with serious mental illness
Kauppi, K, Välimäki, M, Hätönen, HM, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014 · Cochrane Library
SchizophreniaAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 14.3%Ungraded 2 · 28.6%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 28.6%Moderate 2 · 28.6%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) FOR PROMPTING/SUPPORT + STANDARD CARE compared with STANDARD CARE for treatment compliance for people with serious mental illness
Population: patients with treatment compliance for people with serious mental illness
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Compliance with medication: Would stop taking medication Morisky Green Adherence Questionnaire (MAQ) INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) FOR PROMPTING/SUPPORT + STANDARD CARE vs STANDARD CARE | RR 1.11 [0.96, 1.29] | 1 study · 320 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Service utilisation ‐ not reported INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) FOR PROMPTING/SUPPORT + STANDARD CARE vs STANDARD CARE | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |
Adverse effects/events INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) FOR PROMPTING/SUPPORT + STANDARD CARE vs STANDARD CARE | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Mental state: Average change in specific symptom scores: depressive scores degree of change CGI‐SCH‐DC INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) FOR PROMPTING/SUPPORT + STANDARD CARE vs STANDARD CARE | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 251 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Acceptability (of intervention): Leaving the studies early – any reason Loss to INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) FOR PROMPTING/SUPPORT + STANDARD CARE vs STANDARD CARE | RR 1.46 [0.7, 3.05] | 2 studies · 347 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Quality of life: Average change Euroquol 5D, visual analogue scale INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) FOR PROMPTING/SUPPORT + STANDARD CARE vs STANDARD CARE | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 251 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Costs INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) FOR PROMPTING/SUPPORT + STANDARD CARE vs STANDARD CARE | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |