Cochrane · systematic review · CD009928
Virtual reality for treatment compliance for people with serious mental illness
Välimäki, M, Hätönen, HM, Lahti, ME, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014 · Cochrane Library
SchizophreniaAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 2 · 28.6%Very low 0 · 0%Low 5 · 71.4%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
VIRTUAL REALITY AS A SOLE METHOD + STANDARD PROFESSIONAL CARE compared with STANDARD PROFESSIONAL CARE for treatment compliance for people with serious mental illness
Population: patients with treatment compliance for people with serious mental illness
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Compliance Measured using: loss to VIRTUAL REALITY AS A SOLE METHOD + STANDARD PROFESSIONAL CARE vs STANDARD PROFESSIONAL CARE | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 156 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Mental state: any outcome VIRTUAL REALITY AS A SOLE METHOD + STANDARD PROFESSIONAL CARE vs STANDARD PROFESSIONAL CARE | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Functioning: 1. Cognitive ‐ average endpoint total Measured using: Cognistat VIRTUAL REALITY AS A SOLE METHOD + STANDARD PROFESSIONAL CARE vs STANDARD PROFESSIONAL CARE | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 27 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Functioning: 2. Social ‐ average change in social problem solving Measured using: SPSI‐R VIRTUAL REALITY AS A SOLE METHOD + STANDARD PROFESSIONAL CARE vs STANDARD PROFESSIONAL CARE | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 64 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Quality of life: any outcome VIRTUAL REALITY AS A SOLE METHOD + STANDARD PROFESSIONAL CARE vs STANDARD PROFESSIONAL CARE | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
Satisfaction with treatment: Average change score ‐ interest in social skills training Measured using: un‐referenced measure VIRTUAL REALITY AS A SOLE METHOD + STANDARD PROFESSIONAL CARE vs STANDARD PROFESSIONAL CARE | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 64 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |
Acceptability of intervention Measured using: leaving the study early for any reason VIRTUAL REALITY AS A SOLE METHOD + STANDARD PROFESSIONAL CARE vs STANDARD PROFESSIONAL CARE | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 92 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness |