Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

187 questions · 189 findings · 84 reviews

No studies found 16 · 8.5%GRADE not reported 7 · 3.7%Very low 44 · 23.3%Low 57 · 30.2%Moderate 47 · 24.9%High 18 · 9.5%

Any antihypertensive drug vs placebo or no treatment

Coronary heart disease mortality + morbidity · adults 60 years or older with primary hypertension

Antihypertensive drug probably leads to lower coronary heart disease mortality and morbidity Mean duration of 2.9… compared with placebo or no treatment (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antihypertensive drug therapy vs control

Cardiovascular mortality and morbidity Mean duration of 3.7 years · adults aged 18‐59 years with primary hypertension (mild to moderate systolic or diastolic hypertension)

Antihypertensive drug therapy may leads to lower total cardiovascular mortality + morbidity compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antihypertensive drug therapy vs control

Coronary heart disease mortality + morbidity · adults aged 18‐59 years with primary hypertension (mild to moderate systolic or diastolic hypertension)

Antihypertensive drug therapy showed no clear difference in coronary heart disease mortality + morbidity compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intensive glycaemic control vs conventional glucose control

All‐cause mortality · patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Intensive glycaemic control showed no clear difference in mortality compared with standard glycaemic control (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 2 reviews · compare the 2 reviews

Intensive glycaemic control vs conventional glucose control

Cardiovascular mortality · patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Intensive glycaemic control showed no clear difference in cardiovascular mortality compared with conventional glycaemic control (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) vs placebo or no treatment

All‐cause mortality (RR) · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (RR) compared with placebo or no treatment (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors vs placebo or no treatment

All‐cause mortality (RR) · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (RR) compared with placebo or no treatment (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) vs placebo or no treatment

Cardiovascular mortality · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) showed no clear difference in cardiovascular mortality (RR) compared with placebo or no treatment (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery vs surgery

Perioperative mortality · women with stage IIIc or IV ovarian cancer

It is very uncertain whether ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery changes adverse event: perioperative mortality compared with standard surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors vs placebo or no treatment

Cardiovascular mortality · patients with chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) showed no clear difference in cardiovascular mortality (RR) compared with placebo or no treatment (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review