Cochrane · systematic review · CD007697

Ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery versus standard surgery for the primary cytoreduction of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

Hiu, S, Bryant, A, Gajjar, K, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2022 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
9
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
3
Included studies
NR
No studies 3 · 33.3%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 5 · 55.6%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 1 · 11.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery compared to standard surgery in women with stage IIIc or IV ovarian cancer

Population: women with stage IIIc or IV ovarian cancer
9 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Survival (overall and disease‐ specific)
Ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery vs standard surgery
HR 0.6 [0.43, 0.82]2 studies · 397 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Progression‐free survival
Ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery vs standard surgery
HR 0.62 [0.42, 0.92]1 study · 203 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Disease‐free survival
Ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery vs standard surgery
HR 1.6 [1.11, 2.31]1 study · 527 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Rate of optimal cytoreduction
Ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery vs standard surgery
no estimate extractedNRHigh
Recurrence rate
Ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery vs standard surgery
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
(Loco)regional control
Ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery vs standard surgery
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse event: perioperative mortality
Ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery vs standard surgery
no estimate extracted2 studies · 397 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse event: serious postoperative morbidity
Ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery vs standard surgery
RR 3.24 [1.84, 5.68]1 study · 203 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Quality of Life
Ultra‐radical (extensive) surgery vs standard surgery
no estimate extractedNRNo studies