Quality of life/Mental health outcome · severe mental illness
1 finding from 1 review
Mental state: clinically important change in mental state · severe mental illness
Summary of findings table ‐ Collaborative care showed no clear difference in mental state: clinically important change (binary) compared with usual care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Psychiatric hospital admission: psychiatric admission Numbers admitted · severe mental illness
Summary of findings table ‐ Collaborative care showed no clear difference in psychiatric hospital admissions compared with usual care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Health‐related quality of life (physical) · severe mental illness
1 finding from 1 review
Disability (proxy for social functioning) · severe mental illness
Summary of findings table ‐ Collaborative care showed no clear difference in disability (proxy for social functioning) compared with usual care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Personal recovery ‐ not reported · severe mental illness
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Experience of care/satisfaction ‐ not reported · severe mental illness
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Behaviour: aggressive or violent behaviour · aggressive behaviour in schizophrenia
Structured risk assessment probably leads to lower scientific behaviour: aggression – clinically important change in… compared with standard professional care (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Use of coercive measure: use of seclusion room (time, days) · aggressive behaviour in schizophrenia
Structured risk assessment showed no clear difference in use of coercive measure: use of seclusion room (time, days) compared with standard professional care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Use of coercive measure: use of seclusion room (participants) · aggressive behaviour in schizophrenia
Structured risk assessment showed no clear difference in use of coercive measure: use of seclusion room (participants) compared with standard professional care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Use of coercive measure: use of seclusion room (incidents) · aggressive behaviour in schizophrenia
Structured risk assessment showed no clear difference in use of coercive measure: use of seclusion room (incidents) compared with standard professional care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects (escape) · aggressive behaviour in schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether structured risk assessment changes adverse effects (escape) compared with standard professional care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects (fall down) · aggressive behaviour in schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether structured risk assessment changes adverse effects (fall down) compared with standard professional care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects (choking) · aggressive behaviour in schizophrenia
It is very uncertain whether structured risk assessment changes adverse effects (choking) compared with standard professional care (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mental state · recent‐onset psychosis (less than three years since the start of psychotic symptoms and either first or second psychotic episode)
1 finding from 1 review
Global state ‐ number of participants with relapse/exacerbations of psychosis (combined time points) · recent‐onset psychosis (less than three years since the start of psychotic symptoms and either first or second psychotic episode)
Summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive behavioural therapy plus… showed no clear difference in global state ‐ number of participants with relapse/exacerbations of… compared with control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Leaving the study early ‐ for any reason ‐ overall acceptability (combined time points) · recent‐onset psychosis (less than three years since the start of psychotic symptoms and either first or second psychotic episode)
Summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive behavioural therapy plus… showed no clear difference in leaving the study early ‐ for any reason ‐ overall acceptability… compared with control (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Functioning at · recent‐onset psychosis (less than three years since the start of psychotic symptoms and either first or second psychotic episode)
1 finding from 1 review
Risk for at least one adverse event per patient · recent‐onset psychosis (less than three years since the start of psychotic symptoms and either first or second psychotic episode)
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Cognitive behavioural therapy plus… changes adverse events ‐ participants with at least one adverse event ‐ < 12… compared with control (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mental state · schizophrenia
1 finding from 1 review